HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029818.jpg

1.67 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Article/report excerpt (likely an attachment to an email or printed web page)
File Size: 1.67 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a political article or report discussing U.S. sanctions against Iran during the Obama administration. It details the signing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the economic impact on Iran (targeting shipping, aluminum, oil, gold), and speculates that the nomination of Hagel for Secretary of Defense signals a shift in White House strategy away from purely coercive measures. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation document dump.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Barack Obama President of the United States
Signed the NDAA into law; administration's stance on Iran sanctions is discussed.
Chuck Hagel Nominee for Secretary of Defense
Referenced as 'Hagel'; his nomination is analyzed as a potential signal of changing White House strategy regarding Iran.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Congress
Passed the sanctions.
The Washington Post
Paraphrased U.S. officials regarding the severity of the new policies.
White House
Mentioned regarding the realization that sanctions might not force Iran's hand.
Pro-Israel lobby
Mentioned alongside hawks and neoconservatives in Washington.
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (2 events)

Contextual (Circa 2012/2013)
Signing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
Washington
President Obama
Contextual (Circa early 2013)
Nomination of Hagel for Secretary of Defense
Washington
Hagel White House

Locations (2)

Location Context
Target of sanctions and economic measures.
Location of political activity and lobbying.

Relationships (1)

Barack Obama Political (Nominator/Nominee) Chuck Hagel
Text mentions 'the nomination of Hagel... may be a sign that the White House is beginning to realize...'

Key Quotes (3)

"“the new policies are closer to a true trade embargo, designed to systematically attack and undercut Iran’s major financial pillars and threaten the country with economic collapse.”"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029818.jpg
Quote #1
"Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that contained the sanctions provisions despite having hinted earlier that he might veto the NDAA"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029818.jpg
Quote #2
"the nomination of Hagel for secretary of defense may be a sign that the White House is beginning to realize that sanctions, and threats of military action, won’t force Iran’s hand."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029818.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,289 characters)

sanctions was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama. The complex set of new measures targets key industrial sectors, including shipping and imports of products such as aluminum, steel and coal, and seeks to block Iran from using barter commodities such as oil and gold to pay for imports. The Washington Post paraphrased U.S. officials as saying that, “the new policies are closer to a true trade embargo, designed to systematically attack and undercut Iran’s major financial pillars and threaten the country with economic collapse.” Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that contained the sanctions provisions despite having hinted earlier that he might veto the NDAA over a host of measures contained in the bill.
If the Obama administration believes that ever-tougher sanctions will cause Iran to cave in at the talks, it’s likely that they are badly misreading Iranian politics.
For many observers, however, and for Iran, too, the nomination of Hagel for secretary of defense may be a sign that the White House is beginning to realize that sanctions, and threats of military action, won’t force Iran’s hand.
As has been widely reported, hawks, neoconservatives, and members of the pro-Israel lobby in Washington have
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029818

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document