HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017735.jpg
2.57 MB
Extraction Summary
1
People
5
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / submission to house oversight committee
File Size:
2.57 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a page from a legal brief or memorandum submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (indicated by the Bates stamp). The text discusses legal precedents and statutes (specifically the CVRA and state laws in Utah, Oregon, South Dakota, and Texas) regarding a prosecutor's ethical obligation to inform the court of a victim's request to be heard during plea bargain proceedings. This is likely part of an argument regarding the violation of victims' rights in the context of the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney |
Name appears at the bottom of the document, indicating he is the author or submitter of this legal argument.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Utah Supreme Court |
Cited in the text regarding a decision on victims' rights.
|
|
| Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited regarding Rule 11 and plea rejections.
|
|
| Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited in footnote 167.
|
|
| Office for Victims of Crime |
Cited in footnote 169 regarding facilitating victim input.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017735'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced regarding state victims' rights amendment and Supreme Court.
|
|
|
Referenced regarding state laws on plea bargains.
|
|
|
Referenced regarding state laws on plea bargains.
|
|
|
Referenced regarding state laws on victim impact statements.
|
Relationships (1)
David Schoen's name appears at the bottom of a document stamped with HOUSE_OVERSIGHT Bates numbering.
Key Quotes (3)
"The prosecutor is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest ... in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win ... but that justice shall be done."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017735.jpg
Quote #1
"Applying the reasoning of Casey to analogous rights in the CVRA, federal prosecutors must, as officers of the court, convey a [*871] victim's request to be heard regarding a plea."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017735.jpg
Quote #2
"When the prosecutor is aware of an objection from a keenly interested member of the public - the victim - the court should not be left in the dark about it."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017735.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,442 characters)
Page 21 of 52
2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *870
court, and the trial judge accepted the plea. The victim then obtained legal counsel and appealed to the Utah Supreme Court, urging that under the Utah Victims' Rights Amendment, her right to be heard regarding a plea had been violated. The State responded that the victim was obligated to ask the trial court directly to be heard rather than relying on the prosecutor to pass that information along. In rejecting the State's argument, the Utah Supreme Court explained that prosecutors, no less than other actors in the criminal justice system, were required to assist victims throughout the process. 165 More important for present purposes, the court also concluded that prosecutors had ethical obligations as officers of the court to convey that information to the judge:
Prosecutors must convey such requests [to be heard] because they are obligated to alert the court when they know that the court lacks relevant information. This duty, which is incumbent upon all attorneys, is magnified for prosecutors because, as our case law has repeatedly noted, prosecutors have unique responsibilities... . The prosecutor is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest ... in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win ... but that justice shall be done. 166
Applying the reasoning of Casey to analogous rights in the CVRA, federal prosecutors must, as officers of the court, convey a [*871] victim's request to be heard regarding a plea. Indeed, the prosecutor should convey not only the request to be heard but also the fact that the victim objects to the plea. In deciding whether to accept a plea, the court must consider the public interest. 167 As the Tenth Circuit has explained, ""Rule 11 also contemplates the rejection of a negotiated plea when the district court believes that bargain is too lenient, or otherwise not in the public interest."' 168 When the prosecutor is aware of an objection from a keenly interested member of the public - the victim - the court should not be left in the dark about it.
An alternative way of drafting the rule is to require courts to inquire of prosecutors whether the victim has been advised of the proposed plea and whether the victim wishes to make a statement concerning it. 169 For example, Oregon requires the court to ask the prosecutor whether the victim has been consulted about a plea and, if so, what the victim's view is:
Before the judge accepts a plea of guilty or no contest, the judge shall ask the district attorney if the victim requested to be notified and consulted regarding plea discussions. If the victim has made such a request, the judge shall ask the district attorney if the victim agrees or disagrees with the plea discussions and agreement and the victim's reasons for agreement or disagreement. 170
South Dakota law contains a similar requirement that prosecutors disclose "any comments" by the victim about the plea. 171 Texas law requires the court to ask the prosecutor whether a victim impact statement has been submitted; 172 if so, the court
______________
165 Casey, 44 P.3d at 763.
166 Id. at 764 (internal quotations and citations omitted).
167 See, e.g., United States v. Bean, 564 F.2d 700 (5th Cir. 1977).
168 United States v. Carrigan, 778 F.2d 1454, 1462 (10th Cir. 1985) (emphasis added) (quoting United States v. Miller, 722 F.2d 562, 563 (9th Cir. 1983)).
169 See Office for Victims of Crime, supra note 137, at 108 ("Judges should facilitate the input of crime victims into plea agreements ... and they should request that prosecuting attorneys demonstrate that reasonable efforts were made to confer with the victim.").
170 Or. Rev. Stat. 135.406(1)(b) (2003).
171 S.D. Codified Laws 23A-7-9 (2004) ("The prosecuting attorney shall disclose on the record any comments on the plea agreement made by the victim, or his designee, of the defendant's crime to the prosecuting attorney.").
172 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13(e) (Vernon Supp. 2004) ("Before accepting a plea of guilty or a plea of nolo contendere, the court shall inquire as to whether a victim impact statement has been returned to the attorney representing the state and ask for a copy of the statement if one has been returned.").
DAVID SCHOEN
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017735
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document