EFTA00023728.pdf

From: "I
To: "
Cc: '1
(USANYS)"
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:51:35 +0000
If it's huge, he said he should look at it first, to make sure it's in a format that they can deal with, and if it's small it can go
directly to PAE (since even if it's screwed up, they won't take much time on it).
But also, it likely won't be clear what we're getting from the hard drive itself, so given that we're receiving a subset of the
devices, we just want to know which ones are on the drive.
All that said, if he doesn't respond, we'll just take the drive and send it to M.
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2020 15:49
To:
Cc: >;
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
I wouldn't count on a response from — he won't response quickly, and we'll end up annoyed. Just out of curiosity,
what is the significance of knowing what is on the drive before sending to PAE? Is there any particular work is doing
in his initial review that we need done?
From:
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 3:43 PM
To: (USANYS)
Cc:
Subject: FW: Epstein search warrant documents
>;
We didn't get any devices yesterday, but said that is picking up the hard drive from today. I spoke
with who normally takes an initial look at this stuff (but is working remotely). Depending on the volume, the
devices will either go to him or directly to PAE. Just need to know from what we're actually getting.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2020 15:42
To: . (NY) (FBI) a =, (USANYS) [Contractor] < >
Cc: (USANYS) . (NY) (FBI) <->,
>; (NY) (FBI)
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
I understand that some number of the devices are ready to come to us as early as today or tomorrow. Could you please
let us know the following information, so we can figure out who the hard drive should go to in the first instance:
• How many total devices are coming to us in this initial production?
o What are those devices — i.e., type of device and which ones, from the spreadsheets you've sent?
• What's the total volume of data coming in this round of production?
Once we know that, I can let the agents know where the drive needs to go in the first instance.
thanks,
From:
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 16:23
To: . (NY) (FBI)' < MI>; IM, (USANYS) [Contractor] a>
Cc: (USANYS) < >1 (NY) (FBI) <->;
(NY) (FBI)
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Checking in for the estimate of when we can expect to get all the USVI materials?
thanks,
From:
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 13:00
To: (NY) (FBI) 'c ls;
Cc: (USANYS) < >;
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
(USANYS) [Contractor] <
. (NY) (FBI) <—>,
(NY) (FBI)
Okay thanks — good luck with the cardiologist! And if you can let us know tomorrow that would be great. Thanks again.
From: (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:59
To: M, (USANYS) [Contractor] a
Cc: (USANYS) < >; (NY) (FBI) <->;
sc ›; c )
(NY) (FBI)
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
When I'm in the office tomorrow, I will be better able to estimate. I'm at my cardiologist right now.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On Jun 29, 2020 12:56 PM,' PO <
> wrote:
Great, thanks. Is there even a rough estimate of when we will get the USVI materials? Or an estimate of when you'll be
able to see how many items to export, so we'll have a better sense of when we'll get those?
From: (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:55
To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >;
Cc: (USANYS) ; (NY) (FBI) <->;
(NY) (FBI)
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Yep
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On Jun 29, 2020 12:52 PM,' <
> wrote:
Okay, and I'm sorry to ask again, but to make sure, in this production, you're sending us new versions of what you
previously sent?
From: (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:50
To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < I>;
Cc: (USANYS) ; . (NY) (FBI) <->;
sc ›; (NY) (FBI)
c ›; (USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
You are getting both NY and USVI. The biggest stumbling block are the newer Mac items that are in APFS
(there are a bunch from the Island,) so it is difficult to estimate how long those will take until I see how many
items I have to export.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On Jun 29, 2020 12:40 PM, " <
> wrote:
Okay thanks, and just to clarify, a few days to finalize the New York materials, and then what about the USVI materials? I
think that is quite a bit more. Just looking for an estimated completion date for everything.
And on my other question — does this mean you're giving us a new, complete copy of everything from both NY and USVI?
thanks,
From: (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:34
To: M, (USANYS) [Contractor] < >;
Cc: (USANYS)
;
(NY) (FBI)
I am in the process of exporting the materials (documents, spreadsheets, emails, etc) for your review as per my
discussions with . Most of the NY stuff is done, just Mac items left. This might take a few days as 1 item in
particular has over 500,000 emails. We will be able to provide discovery once Defense Council has provided
drives for us to copy items over to. This goes quicker as there is no processing involved. I'll let you know when
everything is complete.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On Jun 29, 2020 11:03 AM, " > wrote:
Following up on this, I understand from that she was able to provide you with a 12 TB drive last week— could you
please let us know when we will be able to get the materials? I expect a judge will ask us about discovery as early as this
week.
Also, the related critical question that I don't think we have clarity on is whether you're giving us a copy of everything that
was collected (including reproducing the materials that you previously gave us, but which are not searchable), or have you
and figured out a way to categorize the prior productions so they're useful for us? We would strongly prefer to just
get everything at once in a usable format, but please let us know if you expect to produce materials differently than that.
thanks,
From: (NY) (FBI) < II>
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 13:14
To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >;
Cc: (USANYS) ; . (NY) (FBI) <->;
C 2; (NY) (FBI)
wrote:
following up on the below — please let us know? Given case developments in recent days, this has become
urgent. Thanks.
From:
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 14:28
To: . (NY) (FBI) ;
< ); (NY) (FBI) < ::.;
) (USANYS) < I>
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
(USANYS) [Contractor] <
)
(USANYS)
Wanted to circle back on this and check in, particularly because we desperately need to get the results from the July and
September searches before moving forward with possible additional charges in the case. I know you had mentioned you
needed to push back your prior estimate of complete production by early June, by a couple weeks, so wanted to see what
the current estimate is? I don't think we've started to get anything yet but please correct me if I'm wrong.
thanks,
From: (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 16:28
To: (USANYS) [Contractor] <
Cc: (NY) (FBI) c )
;
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Will do.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
(NY) (FBI) < >
On Jun I, 2020 4:26 PM, ' > wrote:
Understood, and thanks for letting us know. Let's keep in touch both on timing and also on whether there's a way to
identify and categorize what's already been produced, or if we'll need to just get all the raw data at this stage and go from
there.
From: (NY) (FBI)
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 16:23
To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >;
Cc: (NY) (FBI) cS;
>, (NY) (FBI)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Unfortunately, recent events and our staffing levels have conspired to put a kink in just about everything. If we
can't make heads or tails of the stuff I've already produced, we'll do it again. They have told us that our staffing
levels will be steadily increasing over the next few weeks, but I'm going to have to push back my estimate by a
week or 2. Sorry about that. My next day in the office is Thursday, so I'll be able to see if I can easily identify
what I already gave you and many it to a reliable identifier.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On Jun 1, 2020 4:13 PM, "
IMB
II <
Thanks for this update — we'll take a look and circle back if any questions.
> wrote:
Separately, to follow up on a question from the May 15 email below, the list has just five devices as still pending to be
transferred to us, and I think it's right that the plan is to reproduce all the materials so that we can get them in searchable
format, but just wanted to confirm? Currently, we aren't able to match any of the prior productions to specific devices —
so if we're able to match them up by Bates number now, that might work, but otherwise I think it makes sense for us to
get everything. But let us know if any issue with that.
And related to that question, are we still on track to get the full range of data in the next week or so? I don't think we've
gotten any updates on that status in the past few weeks, and we're eager to be able to start reviewing.
thanks again,
From: (NY) (FBI) a>
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 12:53
To:
Cc:
(NY) (FBI) .
Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents
>: (USANYS) [Contractor]
(NY) (FBI) a>
>;
Updated item descriptions. Just a side note, many thumb drives and SD cards will not have a serial number
visible externally, but will report one through our tools. I included those electronically reported serial numbers.
Any questions, let me know.
FBI NY CART Coordinator
Senior Examiner
From:
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 4:11 PM
To: . (NY) (FBI) alM).;
Cc: cS;
(NY) (FBI) c (NY) (FBI) •c >
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
(USANYS) [Contractor]
Thanks for this, it's a helpful start. In terms of being able to write our search warrant, one additional piece of information
we need is the serial number, or some other specific identifier, ideally for each device but at least for any device that there
is more than one of the same thing. So for example, we need to be able to somehow differentiate the following devices —
The two Dell power edge T310 hard drives (NYCO24323 and NYCO24324)
The two Sony Vaio laptop / Fujitsu hdd (NYCO24336 and NYCO24337)
the following loose storage devices:
o Micro SD card (NYCO24339)
o Flash Drive (generic) (NYCO24340)
o Thumbdrive (Emtec) (NYCO24341)
o hard drive (loose) (NYCO24342)
o verbatim thumbdrive (NYCO24343)
The four San Disk cruzer-thumbdrives (NYCO24344-47)
The three Seagate IDE hard drives (NYCO24348-50)
The camera SD card (NYCO24351)
I think the rest of the devices are either specifically distinguishable and/or have an S/N listed. (By comparison, the USVI
spreadsheet we have lists an s/n for about 20 of the 25(ish) devices.
The other thing we're looking for is the location in the house (and ideally specific location) for each device, which the USVI
list also has — is that info available?
The list also has just five devices as still pending to be transferred to us, and I think it's right that the plan is to reproduce
all the materials so that we can get them in searchable format, but just wanted to confirm? Currently, we aren't able to
match any of the prior productions to specific devices — so if we're able to match them up by Bates number now, that
might work, but otherwise I think it makes sense for us to get everything. But let us know if any issue with that.
thanks very much,
From: (NY) (FBI)
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 15:54
To:
Cc: I
(NY) (FBI) < I>;
Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents
(USANYS) [Contractor)
. (NY) (FBI) < >
Here is The listing of all the evidence gathered in NY that I have. I added some columns to guide you to the
unique numbers CART NY uses fro their evidence. The template wasn't a slam dunk over, so I did what I could to
convey the information. If you are confused by anything, please let me know. In the column for approximate
size, it is in GB, totaled at the bottom and converted to TB. In the materials contained column, I put what load
file group the data was transferred over in (Mac, Windows, Loose Media, IDE, or Blacklight) If there is no entry
in that column, that data has yet to be transferred. There are 2 Macs and a DVR you don't have as well as an
iPhone and an iPad. IF the descriptions are a bit light, let me know and I'll do what I can to beef them up. I will
get you the Island stuff tomorrow.
FBI NY CART Coordinator
Senior Examiner
From:
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:25 PM
To: . (NY) (FBI) < >;
Cc:
(NY) (FBI) c )';
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
(USANYS) [Contractor]
(NY) (FBI) < >
Respectfully, I think there are some miscommunications here — all we have asked is to receive the materials in a format
such that we can view them using a system we have access to. We're not able to get web-enabled access through any FBI
tool, so we asked for the materials to be transferred in a loadable format so we could put them on Relativity, which both
we and the agents can access. We're required to have the files in a format that we can produce them to defense counsel.
I've done that in many other cases and it hasn't previously been an issue. My understanding from =I is that the best
way to do it now is just for us (the U.S. Attorney's Office) to get the original files, which our vendor will process—by which
I just mean converting into file formats that are loadable onto Relativity. It doesn't really have anything to do with the
taint review—we have to have access to the docs in our systems for discovery purposes.
And we were happy to get the materials as they were processed, but when we received the 1.1 million documents earlier
this year, they were in a format that wasn't usable for the reasons described in the email I sent on March 9. Again, I
understand from =I that the best way forward is to just get copies of the materials in their original formats, which I
understand will be segregated and designated by device. That should work for us! I was just trying to understand the
approach, as well as the timeline.
thanks,
From: (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 13:03
To:
Cc: >;
(NY) (FBI) <->,
Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents
; (USANYS) [Contractor)
. (NY) (FBI) < >
Just to be clear. The US Attorney's Office (or it's contractors) are not "processing" anything. You are taking files
that I will be extracting from processed evidence and putting them into an E-Discovery tool (Relativity) to do a
taint review.
Relativity is NOT a forensic tool. It is incapable of dealing with many things that are found forensically on a
computer like free space, slack space, and system files to name a few. When we started this, and you insisted
you do the taint review in Relativity, I warned you that it was adding months worth of work on top of what was
already done, and that Relativity was incapable of viewing everything. You insisted we do it this way. So now
and I have come up with a way to fit this round peg into this square hole. We will get it done.
Sorry it has taken so long, but we are talking about terabytes worth of data over multiple forms of digital
evidence. Phones, tablets, loose media, cameras, DVRs, servers, laptops, and desktop computers. We have
gotten past encryption on multiple devices. When we review devices on such large cases, we usually do it piece
by piece as things are processed, I was unaware that you didn't want to review as things were processed, that
you wanted to do it "all at once", so that added to the delay. Sorry for that. Just a differentiation of
methodology I suppose.
and I feel confident that the method we have come up with will be more consistent and preserve the
attribution of files to devices and links of e-mails to attachments that the load file generation that I did a while
back was lacking.
FBI NY CART Coordinator
Senior Examiner
From:
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:33 AM
To: (NY) (FBI) scMe;
Cc:
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
(USANYS) [Contractor]
Okay, so just to check, you both think that there is not a need to do a test run? You're both comfortable with just basically
sending us copies of everything? I don't totally understand why we couldn't have done that eight months ago, but
regardless of the passage of time, I want to make sure we understand so we can report to our supervisors. I assume that
means that we (at the U.S. Attorney's Office and through contractors) will therefore need to do all the processing
ourselves, correct? And thanks again to you both.
From: (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:30
To: (USANYS) [Contractor]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:11
To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >;
Cc:
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
>;
> wrote:
I will use the spreadsheet, no problem. and I ironed out all the details. We've got a good plan moving
forward that will meet your needs.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On May 12, 2020 10:34 AM, " / > wrote:
It would be very helpful for us if you could please use the attached spreadsheet in transmitting that info so we
make sure we get all the info we need. I think you had previously sent us a list of certain information that unfortunately
wasn't helpful for us, so we want to make sure we're all on the same page.
In terms of data transfer, are you just sending a literal copy of all the raw data, and we'll process and upload it on
our end? I ask to make sure we don't lose any searchability — when FBI sent versions before, it had already been
processed. I think what we talked about on the phone a month ago was getting, for example, data from one device to
make sure it transfers correctly, before sending over literally everything — is that still the plan?
thanks,
From: MI, (USANYS) [Contractor]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 10:27
To:
Cc: . (NY) (FBI) < >
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Hello
Me and just finished our phone call regarding the data. will put together a list of the all of the data and
where the data was collected. I will work to send some hard drives to so he can begin to copy the data and send
it to us. I will need to figure out a way to get the data off of the hard drives.
Please let us know if there are any questions.
Thank you.
From:
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 2:15 PM
To: . (NY) (FBI) c: >; (USANYS)
(NY) (FBI) (USANYS) •r: =>
Cc: a, (USANYS) [Contractor] < >; /
ca; (NY)
(FBI)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Okay thanks - please do let us know if at any point that changes, otherwise we'll look forward to being able to review the
returns in early June. Thanks again.
From: (NY) (FBI)
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 14:14
To: (USANYS)
(NY) (FBI) c >; (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >;
(FBI)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
) (NY)
There has been talk of us returning to normal soon, so I don't think it will effect the timeline I initially gave you.
If it does, I'll let you know.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On May 8, 2020 1:58 PM, ' " < > wrote:
Understood, thanks—it will be great to get that list on Thursday. As a refresh, the info we are looking for is in the
attached spreadsheet template.
On the returns themselves, do the changes you mentioned mean that the estimate of a month from now for complete
transmission of the search warrant returns is no longer likely? If so could you please let us know what the current
estimate would be, so we can factor that in? Thanks very much.
From: (NY) (FBI)
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 13:50
To: (USANYS) ; ) <
(NW) (FBI) c >; (USANYS)
Cc: =I (USANYS) [Contractor] ;
(FBI)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
1a; (NY)
Sony for the delay, they reduced us to 1 day a week, so things have been stretched out by a factor of 5. I will be
back in the office on Thursday and will be able to get you the list then as I have to access some of our systems to
do so.
Also, , please reach out to me at one of the numbers below so we can brain storm. Thanks.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On May 8, 2020 12:10 PM,' I/ < > wrote:
Following up on the below, I think you had said you expected to be able to get us a list of the devices seized from the
search warrants at Epstein's residences in New York and the USVI, as well as from his person upon arrest, in about a
month (during our conference call a month ago) — so wanted to check if we can still expect that very soon? We're waiting
on that list to be able to do an updated search warrant on all of those devices. Please let us know the current timeline —
and also the current timeline on producing the results from those August and September searches? I think you and
were going to coordinate on that, and you had mentioned you expected we'd have it a couple months from our call, which
would be about a month from now. Wanted to make sure we're still on track.
thanks,
IM•
From: (NY) (FBI) <
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 15:27
To:
. (NY) (FBI) <->;
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] <
(USANYS) <
(FBI) <
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
>;
)<
(USANYS)
) <
(NY)
Ok let's plan on 11am tomorrow morning, I am trying to get an FBI line with a larger capacity but I won't know until
tomorrow am. I will push it out when confirmed.
Thanks
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 3:15 PM
To: (NY) (FBI) <
(NY) (FBI) <
Cc:
) [mailtod
>;
(USANYS) [Contractor]
>; (USANYS) < >;
(USANYS)
(NY) (FBI) < >
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Yes, I can do anytime tomorrow, and can also join anytime tomorrow. So whenever is good on your end.
Also, we can host a conference call, but only up to six lines at a time — so if FBI has larger capacity than that let us know,
otherwise I'd propose we do:
4)
5) /MI
6) if either of you wants to join (and if not, one of
From: (NY) (FBI) <
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 14:13
To: (USANYS) <
>;
>; (NY) (FBI) <
(USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] <->;
(FBI)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
>;
) (NY)
Are vou available tomorrow for a conference call to discuss this issue?
SSA
FBI New York
On Apr 7, 2020 1:55 PM, ' wrote:
i=#
Following up on this from a month ago — I know we're living in a different world than what existed four weeks ago, but are
you at all able to assist while working remotely? This has been pending for almost two months and we still don't have a
very basic list of each device or item that was seized and searched, or for which of those we've received materials. We're
happy to have a call if that would be useful, but as a first step the most basic thing we're looking for is the info in the
template spreadsheet we sent earlier (that's also attached).
thanks,
From:
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 12:00
To: . (NY) (FBI) < .>;
(NY) (FBI) <->; (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >;
(USANYS) <
(FBI) <
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
>;
) (NY)
Unfortunately I don't think this is very helpful to us. Did you take a look at the example spreadsheet I sent on 2/24? The
excel file you sent has descriptions that don't match up to the items listed in the search warrant returns (that we sent on
2/23), and we don't have the 1B or CART numbers to be able to cross-reference. We also can't tell what you mean by
"loose media" without a specific comparison to what was seized, we don't know which items you're referring to as
"Windows machines," and we can't tell whether the entirety of any particular item has been transferred, or just partial.
For example, it looks like we have gotten very, very few image files, which is surprising.
We have also encountered some very significant problems in trying to review the more than 1 million documents we
recently received:
The data we've received has no way to put any emails and attachments together. So if an email says, "see the
attached flight records," for example, we have no way of linking that up with the records themselves. Not only is
that a big problem for us in review, it's going to be a huge problem for producing the documents to defense
counsel.
The load file has no link to the native file, so when we load the data to the database, there's no way to have the
native files show up in the database. Because many of the files are too large to open in the viewer, it effectively
means that there are many files that are completely invisible to us.
Related, the control numbers in the load file don't match up to the native files. So we have two sets of numbers
and no way to match up anything—that is, even if we were to try to go hunt down every individual large file in the
native files, it would be impossible.
So the data that we most recently got, we need to get in a form that addresses those issues, and we likely will need to get
a similar reproduction of the data we received a couple months ago. Otherwise we're sifting through more than a million
documents without much rhyme or reason.
I've re-attached the spreadsheet we sent last week — I think that's a good place to start in terms of our necessary record keeping, and we need that info at the very least, as well as anything else you think would be useful. Also attaching the SW
returns for reference. And again, we're happy to meet up anytime and hash all this out in person if that's useful.
thanks,
From: (NY) (FBI) < MI>
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2020 16:36
To:
(NY) (FBI) < >; (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] ;
Ca>
(FBI) a,
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
(USANYS)
(NY)
Here is a listing of what I have already handed over in load files to the US Attorney's Office for taint review. Some points of
clarification: There were 9 IDE hard drives found in the Manhattan apartment, they turned out to be 3 copies of 3 drives
(9 drives in total) from a July 2007 search on one of his properties. I only processed 3 (as they were all copies). All the
loose media from the NY apartment is included. All the Windows machines from the NY apartment are included. Only 2
Macs from NY and 1 from the Island are included.
I will have to more closely coordinate with whoever is loading up Relativity with the remaining Macs as the tool
they have to be processed with does not easily re-name the load files.
Spreadsheet is attached.
NYO CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
(office)
(cell)
From: ) [mailto
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 12:25 PM
To: (NY) (FBI) a; (USANYS)
(NY) (FBI) < ,.; (USANYS)
Cc: M, (USANYS) [Contractor]
>;
(NY) (FBI) sc >
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
I could do Thursday morning, but I think it would be helpful for us to get the accounting in advance of the meeting so we
can figure out in advance what (if any) additional steps we need — is that possible?
From: (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 09:59
To: (USANYS)< =1)
(NY) (FBI) < >; (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >; ) <
(NY) )
(FBI) ; (USANYS) c :,
(NY) (FBI) < :,; (USANYS) •cl >
Cc: M (USANYS) [Contractor] < MM>, I <—>;
; ) < >, (NY)
> wrote:
(FBI)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Totally understand about the network issues—we can relate. I do still think it will be helpful to all sit down together to
have an in-person discussion, to make sure everybody is on the same page. Are folks available for that next week? And
what I think would be most helpful to facilitate that would be a spreadsheet of each separate device referenced in the two
search warrant returns, with columns for whether we've dumped the contents, whether they've been reviewed and/or
transferred, what portions were transferred, etc.
Something roughly like the attached, with any other categories you think would be useful — and the info on the attached is
mostly hypothetical, obviously, just as examples. That will help us fully understand what's been reviewed, transferred,
and received so far, and what remains.
(Also just on the pictures, we do want copies of those as well, please including from the discs and the devices — I think FBI
was going to do an initial screen to make sure no CP, and since I think the answer was no, we'll need to get those to be
able to review them as well.)
many thanks,
From: (NY) (FBI)
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 09:24
To: (USANYS) <
(NY) (FBI) <—>,
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] <
(USANYS)
(FBI) <
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
) c- M >; (NY)
Sony for the delayed response. They are tearing out our old network and giving us a new one, they mandated we
delete old stuff (about 400 TB worth). Now that they are working on replacing the network, we can do only local
work. I should be able to give you an accounting of what is what. I can say, off the top of my head, that all
windows based items from the NY search have been handed over as well as all loose media. The CDs from NY
only contained pictures, no documents. There are still some Apple items from NY that need to be produced. As
far as the Island stuff goes, the 1st item on your spreadsheet, the "kitchen" mac has been produced. Still working
on the rest.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On Feb 23, 2020 12:21 AM, 11
Team,
> wrote:
Following up on the below from last weekend, I'm still not sure how we're addressing this so I thought it would make
sense for us to all schedule a (hopefully relatively brief) meeting to all get on the same page? We didn't hear back on
which files had previously been provided, but our tech folks did their best to differentiate, and we got access to the
materials yesterday and its well over a million documents, and we don't have any idea what we're looking at — i.e., which
devices the materials came from, whether it's full or partial results, how many more devices we have coming, etc.
Based on the attached search warrant returns, it looks like from the New York mansion (the PDF) there are approximately
40 devices that would have storage (computers, hard drives, thumb drives, etc.) and that's not even counting at least 60+
CDs. And then from the Virgin Islands (the Excel spreadsheet), at least more than 25 devices, including multiple servers /
server racks.
So we gotta know what we've already received, what remains, anticipated schedule, etc, and I know it's a lot of moving
pieces on all sides so wanted to loop in everybody at once. The case team will be in California this coming week from
Tuesday through Friday, but then I think generally around the first week of March, which will hopefully be plenty of time
to schedule a productive meeting.
thanks all,
From:
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 16:30
To: (NY) (FBI) .: >;
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >;
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
• (NY) (FBI) c >
I'm not sure who's the exact right person to ask this, so wanted to get everybody on one email chain about it — I have the
hard drive that dropped off that has new Epstein search warrant materials, but it looks like there are also old
materials (that I think we had previously received and uploaded??) on the hard drive, and so I'm not sure what's new.
Just generally, and and I talked about this last week too, but it's basically impossible for us to keep track of what
we're getting, and what has been completed, without some kind of identification or labeling system, along with a list of
which devices have been extracted and downloaded.
So for example on the hard drive currently, there are 38 folders labeled "loadFiles" through "37loadFiles" with a modified
date of 11/14/19, which I think we may have already previously received — but I'm not sure, because we haven't gotten
any info on which folders match up to which devices, etc. And then there's another folder titled "NYC024362" that has a
modified date of 1/27/20, so I think that may be the materials we hadn't previously received? That folder by itself has
more than 600,000 items.
I don't want to give I= anything that we've already previously received and uploaded, and I can't tell from the folder or
file names whether everything on the "drive is new, or whether just additional materials were saved onto it in addition to
what we already have. =, are you able to give us some guidance on this? Ultimately what we really need is a
spreadsheet of every device, whether it's been dumped (or partially dumped), and then identifying that same info —
which device, and what materials from it — are being given to us with each data transfer. Otherwise I think
organizationally and for review purposes it will be a total disaster for us.
We're happy to have a meeting on this if that's helpful — and thanks everybody for the assistance.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York