EFTA00027167.pdf

71.3 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 71.3 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, involving the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Laura Menninger, representing Maxwell, emailed Judge Nathan attaching a Letter Motion for an adjournment of the trial (120 or 180 days) and requesting permission to redact names of other clients based on professional conduct rules. Subsequent emails between government attorneys discuss a draft response due by 5 PM that same day.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Laura Menninger Partner
Sender of the original email; Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell; Partner at Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the case 'US v. Maxwell'; referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell'
Judge Nathan Judge
Addressee of the email from Laura Menninger
Jeff Pagliuca Attorney
Cc recipient on the email from Laura Menninger
Bobbi Sternheim Attorney
Cc recipient on the email from Laura Menninger
Nicole Simmons Attorney
Cc recipient on the email from Laura Menninger

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (recipients of the emails)
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell
Court
The court presiding over US v. Maxwell (SDNY implied)

Timeline (2 events)

2021-04-22
Defense counsel submits Letter Motion for Adjournment of Trial in US v. Maxwell.
Court (SDNY)
2021-04-22
Government attorneys prepare response to adjournment request due by 5 PM.
US Attorney's Office
USANYS staff

Relationships (2)

Laura Menninger Attorney-Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Email signature identifies Laura A. Menninger as Partner at Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.; text refers to 'Counsel for Ms. Maxwell'.
Laura Menninger Legal/Professional Judge Nathan
Email addressed to 'Judge Nathan'

Key Quotes (4)

"Our response is due at 5 today."
Source
EFTA00027167.pdf
Quote #1
"Pursuant to this Court's Order of April 20, 2021 (Dkt. 221), attached please find counsel's Letter Motion for an Adjournment of the trial."
Source
EFTA00027167.pdf
Quote #2
"Counsel for Ms. Maxwell request redaction of their other clients' names and case numbers from this Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6"
Source
EFTA00027167.pdf
Quote #3
"Upon direction of the Court, counsel will file either the redacted or unredacted version of this letter on the public docket."
Source
EFTA00027167.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,461 characters)

From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>, [Redacted], [Redacted]
Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment of Trial]
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:32:25 +0000
Attachments: 2021-04-22_Govt_letter_re_GM_request_for_adjournment_v3.docx
Draft response attached.
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 12:14 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment of Trial]
FYI. Our response is due at 5 today.
From: Laura Menninger <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 11:22 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; 'Bobbi Sternheim ([Redacted])' <[Redacted]>; Nicole Simmons <[Redacted]>
Subject: US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment of Trial]
Judge Nathan -
Pursuant to this Court's Order of April 20, 2021 (Dkt. 221), attached please find counsel's Letter Motion for an Adjournment of the trial.
Counsel for Ms. Maxwell request redaction of their other clients' names and case numbers from this Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6 which prohibits lawyers from revealing confidential information related to a client even where that information is publicly available. See In Re. Anonymous, 654 N.E. 2.d. 1128 (Ind. 1995) (lawyer violated Rule 1.6 by disclosing information relating to representation of client, even though information "was readily available from public sources and not confidential in nature"); In re Bryan, 61 P.3d 641 (Kan. 2003) (lawyer violated Rule 1.6 by disclosing, in court documents, existence of defamation suit against former client); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n v. McGee, 48 P.3d 787, 791 (Okla. 2002) (a lawyer's duty of confidentiality attaches "to all information relating to the representation, whatever its source").
Upon direction of the Court, counsel will file either the redacted or unredacted version of this letter on the public docket.
Best regards,
Laura Menninger
Laura A. Menninger | Partner
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
[Redacted Address Block]
EFTA00027167
[Page 2]
[Redacted Block]
EFTA00027168

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document