EFTA00016816.pdf
68.6 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
68.6 KB
Summary
An email thread between USANYS employees from January 29-30, 2020, discussing a 'Sharing Order Part II'. The discussion focuses on updating an application to share additional trust and will documents recently received from Epstein's estate attorneys. They debate whether to include 'revocations' in the sharing order and coordinate getting the document signed off and sent to 'Part I' (likely the court).
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Senders/Recipients | USANYS Employees |
Discussing legal filings and sharing orders regarding Epstein's estate documents.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, employer of the email participants.
|
|
| Estate Attorneys |
Lawyers representing the Epstein estate who provided documents to the USANYS.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-01
Receipt of additional trust and will documents from Epstein estate attorneys by USANYS.
New York (implied)
Relationships (1)
USANYS Staff 1
→
Colleagues
→
USANYS Staff 2
Email correspondence regarding work tasks and legal filings.
Key Quotes (4)
"I’ve updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received."Source
EFTA00016816.pdf
Quote #1
"Remember, I’m not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be"Source
EFTA00016816.pdf
Quote #2
"I don’t think those are substantive docs but I defer."Source
EFTA00016816.pdf
Quote #3
"Is this something we could get over to Part I today or tomorrow?"Source
EFTA00016816.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,450 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:05:16 +0000
To: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:05:16 +0000
Just wanted to circle back on this – [Redacted], are you signed off? Is this something we could get over to Part I today or tomorrow? Thanks
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:56 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:56 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
[Redacted], is it the intent to share those? If so, I’ll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it’s unnecessary. I don’t think those are substantive docs but I defer.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I’m not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we’ve received, with just a note that it doesn’t appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.
thanks,
[Redacted].
[Redacted].
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
[Redacted] – I’ve updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can?
[Page 2]
[Redacted] – I’ve tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks.
Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I’ve accurately described/characterized the new stuff we’re looking to share?
[Redacted] – I’ve tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks.
Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I’ve accurately described/characterized the new stuff we’re looking to share?
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document