STATE ATTORNEY
OrganizationRelationship Network
091.pdf
A court order from the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal dated July 1, 2009, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. State of Florida. The court granted Epstein's motion to file under seal and stayed a previous June 25, 2009 order that had granted a motion to unseal documents. The State (Respondent) was ordered to show cause within 10 days why Epstein's petition should not be granted.
027.pdf
A court order from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, setting a hearing for May 29, 2009. The hearing concerns a motion by a redacted nonparty to vacate an order sealing records and to unseal records in the case of State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Copies were sent to the Assistant State Attorney, Epstein's lawyer Jack Goldberger, and William J. Berger, attorney for an individual identified as E.W.
EFTA00016816.pdf
An email thread between USANYS employees from January 29-30, 2020, discussing a 'Sharing Order Part II'. The discussion focuses on updating an application to share additional trust and will documents recently received from Epstein's estate attorneys. They debate whether to include 'revocations' in the sharing order and coordinate getting the document signed off and sent to 'Part I' (likely the court).
EFTA00015021.pdf
An email chain between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding a 'Sharing Order' for the Epstein case. The discussion focuses on reviewing and accurately describing recently received estate documents, including wills, 'Trust Two documents,' and a '2019 Trust.' The participants are coordinating to finalize the application and order for submission, likely to a court or another department ('Part I').
EFTA00011146.pdf
An internal email thread from January 29, 2020, between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns updating a 'sharing order application' to include additional trust and will documents recently received from Epstein's estate attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00029919.tif
This document is a fax from the Palm Beach Police Department dated July 15, 2005. It contains a sworn statement from a Detective agreeing to maintain the confidentiality of information obtained via a State Attorney subpoena, explicitly stating that unauthorized dissemination will be prosecuted as Obstructing Justice and that the information is for crime investigation. Redactions are present for specific names or identifiers.
DOJ-OGR-00030367.jpg
This is a 'Plea in the Circuit Court' form from the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein, case number 06-CF-001935 A MB. The document outlines the defendant's waiver of various rights (such as the right to a jury trial, confrontation of witnesses, and appeal) in exchange for a plea, signed by Epstein and his attorney on June 30, 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00030605.jpg
This is an arrest report from the Palm Beach Police Department for Sarah Lynne Kellen. The report details her arrest at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL, on charges of being a principal in unlawful sexual acts (4 counts) and lewd/lascivious molestation (1 count). The arresting officer is identified as Det. Joe Recarey.
DOJ-OGR-00030464.jpg
This document is a Notice of Hearing from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated December 4, 2006. It mandates Jeffrey Epstein's appearance for a Case Disposition hearing on December 8, 2006, in Courtroom 11F regarding Case No. 502006CF009454AXXXMB. The document warns that failure to appear will result in arrest and indicates that attorney Jack A. Goldberger was copied on the correspondence.
DOJ-OGR-00021420.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ report (likely OGR) detailing the period between January and June 2008 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It describes the legal tug-of-war between Epstein's defense (Lefkowitz) and the USAO (Acosta) regarding victim notification under the CVRA, with the defense arguing federal notification was inappropriate. It also details internal DOJ reviews of the case evidence by senior officials (Senior, Oosterbaan, Mandelker, Fisher) which delayed the plea deal, while prosecutor Villafaña and the FBI continued to investigate potential federal charges in anticipation of an NPA breach.
DOJ-OGR-00021406.jpg
This legal document details the aftermath of the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein, focusing on the U.S. Attorney's Office's (USAO) failure to notify victims. OPR's Oosterbaan disagreed with the USAO's decision on policy grounds, while USAO's Sloman believed notification was planned for a later date. Ultimately, despite initial plans by case agents to inform victims, Acosta decided to delay notification about the NPA and its monetary provisions until after Epstein's state guilty plea in June 2008, following objections from Epstein's defense counsel and internal concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00021383.jpg
This page from an OPR report discusses the handling of the Epstein case, concluding that prosecutors did not intend to benefit Epstein but that the outcome resulted from Acosta's concerns about state authority. It highlights communication failures within the team, noting that while Acosta was unusually involved in decision-making, he was removed from the supervisory chain and may not have been fully aware of critical details known by staff members like Villafaña.
DOJ-OGR-00031604.jpg
This document is a signed confidentiality statement by Detective Michele Pagan of the Town of Palm Beach Police Department. In it, she agrees that information obtained via a State Attorney subpoena will remain confidential and used solely for law enforcement purposes, specifically aimed at investigating a crime. The document contains multiple fax headers from April and May 2005, appearing to involve T-Mobile Law Enforcement Relations (LER), suggesting a request for phone records.
DOJ-OGR-00031598.jpg
This document is a sworn statement signed by Detective Michelle D. Pagan of the Palm Beach Police Department on July 15, 2005. In the statement, Detective Pagan affirms that information obtained through a State Attorney subpoena is confidential, will be used solely for the purpose of investigating a crime, and will not be disseminated to anyone outside of law enforcement.
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to provide copies of exhibits to Leopold and the State Attorney during a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm an agreement that Goldberger will now provide copies of all exhibits used.
DOJ-OGR-00003283.jpg
This document details discussions among prosecutors regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It covers the rationale behind a broad non-prosecution provision for co-conspirators and focuses on communications from September 21, 2007, between prosecutor Villafaña and State Attorney Krischer, who were finalizing Epstein's sentence and confirming that sexual offender registration was a non-negotiable term.
DOJ-OGR-00004609.jpg
This document is an excerpt from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report reviewing the Department of Justice's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It concludes that while attorneys did not commit professional misconduct regarding the CVRA or victim communications, Alexander Acosta exercised poor judgment by failing to ensure victims were notified of the state plea hearing and by providing insufficient oversight during the NPA negotiation process.
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
This legal filing from October 2021 discusses the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting a conflict between the Palm Beach Police (led by Chief Reiter) and state prosecutors regarding the leniency of the prosecution. It notes that while police believed they had probable cause to charge Epstein and two redacted individuals, Ghislaine Maxwell was not named in charging documents. The document also raises serious issues regarding the chain of custody of evidence, stating that Detective Recarey is dead and that the FBI allegedly received empty evidence packages.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010521.jpg
This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book regarding the Epstein case, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the trauma experienced by a victim named Mary, who was harassed by private investigators from Miami and treated hostilely by prosecutors during a grand jury appearance on June 28. The text also lists Epstein's high-profile legal defense team, including Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Gerald Lefcourt.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity