Daniel H. Weiner
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
LLP
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. Kahn
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke (D. Indyke)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Heymann
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Daniel Ruzumna
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Estate
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Filing of Document 71 stating the Estate takes no position on unsealing transcripts. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Submission of letter stating the Estate's position on unsealing transcripts. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-02-19 | N/A | USVI Probate Court conference re EVCP funding | USVI Probate Court | View |
| 2021-02-19 | N/A | In camera hearing re EVC fund and GVI Motion | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-02-04 | N/A | USVI probate court hearing | USVI Probate Court | View |
| 2020-02-04 | N/A | Hearing for Estate (Probate Court) | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
071.pdf
A legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP (representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein) to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter states that the Estate takes no position regarding the Government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the Epstein case, provided that the Government maintains its commitment to redact victim-related and personal identifying information.
2022.03.17-2%20Exhibit%202.pdf
This document is 'Government Exhibit 2' filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands on March 17, 2022. It is a detailed legal billing record totaling $112,216.90 for the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, listing work performed by attorneys (Weiner, Heymann, Kroblin, etc.) to oppose the Virgin Islands Government's motions to intervene and freeze estate assets. The document includes the Government's specific objections to these fees, often citing 'Duplication', 'Block Billing', or 'Unrelated Activity' (specifically referencing the Epstein Victims Compensation Program/Fund).
2022.03.17%20%20Notice%20-%20Notice%20to%20the%20Court.pdf
This document is an opposition brief filed by the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands against the Epstein Estate's request for over $112,000 in attorneys' fees. The Government argues that the Estate is not a 'prevailing party' because the underlying court orders were not final judgments, and that the requested hourly rates (up to $1,315/hr) are excessive compared to the local standard of $350/hr. The filing also references the Government's broader CICO lawsuit alleging Epstein used his VI businesses to transport and abuse victims on Little St. James Island.
2022.03.04-5%20Exhibit%20(Affidavit%202).pdf
This document is an affidavit filed by Daniel H. Weiner on March 4, 2022, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands regarding the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Weiner, a partner at Hughes Hubbard & Reed representing Co-Executor Darren K. Indyke, attests to his professional qualifications and billing rates ($1,315/hr in 2020, $1,251/hr in 2021, $1,450/hr current). Attached exhibits include his professional biography and a detailed ledger of fees charged between January 2020 and March 2021 related to 'GVI Motions and GVI Appeal,' totaling dozens of billable hours.
2022.03.04%20Motion%20-%20Motion.pdf
This document is a Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The Co-Executors are requesting $112,216.90 in fees incurred while successfully defending against the Government of the Virgin Islands' (GVI) attempts to intervene in the probate action and freeze estate assets. The document details the history of the GVI's failed motions, the complex nature of the estate, the funding of the Victims' Compensation Program ($121 million+), and justifies the legal fees based on the attorneys' experience and standard rates.
EFTA00039019.pdf
An April 2023 email chain between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent regarding the discovery of potential Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). During a legal review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender that potentially depicted minors. The Estate halted the review and reported the finding to the FBI for guidance.
EFTA00039017.pdf
This document contains an email chain from April 19, 2023, between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent regarding the discovery of potential Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). Attorneys reviewing approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files for civil litigation discovered a video depicting topless women, reportedly shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The attorneys halted their review and contacted the FBI for guidance on how to proceed.
EFTA00039011.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 19, 2023, between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking division. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography (CSAM) depicting topless women, which had been shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The emails coordinate a phone call between the attorneys and the FBI to discuss the discovery and next steps.
EFTA00039004.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from April 2023 between lawyers representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Patterson Belknap and Hughes Hubbard) and the FBI Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. The lawyers report finding a video potentially containing Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) among 1,100 videos extracted from Epstein's files during a document review. They arrange a meeting at the Hughes Hubbard offices in New York to discuss the finding and hand over information to the FBI.
EFTA00039001.pdf
This document is an email from April 2023 sent by Daniel Ruzumna, an attorney for the Epstein Estate, to a federal agent. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography, which had been sent to Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The review was immediately halted, and the Estate sought guidance from federal authorities.
EFTA00038997.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from April and May 2023 between legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed and Patterson Belknap) and the FBI's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. The lawyers report that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, they discovered material potentially constituting Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). They halted their review, contacted the FBI to hand over the materials, and arranged meetings to facilitate this process.
DOJ-OGR-00000765.jpg
A legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP (representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein) to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter states that the Epstein Estate takes no position regarding the Government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts, provided that victim identities are protected via redaction.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | Received | Estate of Jeffrey... | Daniel H. Weiner | $69,970.40 | Total Labor fees. | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Received | Epstein Estate | Daniel H. Weiner | $1,315.00 | Hourly billing rate (2020). | View |
Draft response to USVI AG appeal
Respond to client inquiry re draft response to USVI AG appeal; communications with USVI counsel re same.
Draft response to USVI AG appeal
No preview available
USVI AG appeal
No preview available
Appeal filed by USVI AG
Review appeal filed by USVI AG and communications re same.
Opposition to USVI emergency motion
Communications with R. Kahn, D. Indyke re opposition to USVI emergency motion, and revise same.
Opposition to USVI emergency motion
No preview available
USVI AG's emergency motion
No preview available
February 4 hearing
Communications with client group re February 4 hearing.
February 4 hearing
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity