| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Miss Roberts
|
Advocate witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Simpson
|
Interviewer witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Simpson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Mr. Cassell | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Marking of 'Exhibit 3' (Cassell 3) | Deposition/Hearing Room | View |
| 0030-12-01 | N/A | A specific date mentioned by the witness regarding their memory of events. | Unspecified | View |
This is page 131 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness identified as Mr. Cassell about the legality of a romantic relationship between a middle-aged man and a 24-year-old. The proceedings are interrupted by Mr. Scarola noting the time is 4:30, leading to a tense exchange between Mr. Scarola and Mr. Scott regarding whether Mr. Scott is smiling.
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee's investigation given the Bates stamp. An emotional witness (likely a victim) defends 'multiple girls' against attacks from the questioning attorney's side and requests a break. During the recess (4:01-4:04 p.m.), Mr. and Mrs. Dershowitz leave the room. Attorney Mr. Simpson then attempts to question Mr. Cassell, but is interrupted by Ms. McCawley noting the witness had stepped out for water.
This is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript (page 106) stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The exchange is between Mr. Simpson (questioner) and Mr. Cassell (witness). Tensions rise as Cassell defends a lengthy answer, stating he was not filibustering but addressing a matter critical to 'Miss Roberts' involving 'sexual abuse.' Simpson apologizes for attempting humor, acknowledging the intensity of the situation, and compares Cassell's conduct to that of Professor Dershowitz.
A page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing involving the House Oversight Committee. Mr. Simpson questions the witness, Mr. Cassell, about a document Cassell prepared to summarize his knowledge. They agree to mark this document as 'Exhibit 3' (Cassell 3), with Cassell clarifying that the document contains pre- and post-December 30th sections.
Discussion regarding a document prepared by Cassell to summarize his knowledge, to be marked as Exhibit 3.
Discussion about the legality of a romantic relationship with a 24-year-old and procedural arguments between lawyers.
Mr. Cassell defends his detailed answer against a perceived accusation of filibustering, stressing the importance of the subject to Miss Roberts. Mr. Simpson apologizes for a joke.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity