021-01.pdf
52.1 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order (final order of dismissal)
File Size:
52.1 KB
Summary
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, dated July 20, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the civil case (09-CIV-81092) brought by plaintiff L.M. against Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in a civil lawsuit brought by L.M.
|
| L.M. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff suing Jeffrey Epstein (likely a pseudonym/initials for a victim)
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | Judge |
United States District Judge issuing the order
|
| Johnson | Judge/Magistrate |
Name appears in case number (MARRA/JOHNSON), likely the Magistrate Judge assigned
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
The court where the case was filed and adjudicated
|
Timeline (3 events)
2010-07
2010-07-20
Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice filed
West Palm Beach, Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the Chambers where the order was signed
|
Relationships (1)
Plaintiff v. Defendant in case caption; entered into a settlement agreement.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,033 characters)
Case 9:09-cv-81092-KAM Document 21-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2010 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 09-CIV-81092 – MARRA/JOHNSON
L.M.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
_________________________/
_________________________/
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with
Prejudice [DE___], filed July , 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In
accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
Prejudice [DE___], filed July , 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In
accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties'
settlement.
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties'
settlement.
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida this ____ day
of July, 2010.
of July, 2010.
KENNETH A. MARRA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies Furnished to:
All Counsel of Record
All Counsel of Record
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document