Estate

Organization
Mentions
59
Relationships
2
Events
0
Documents
29
Also known as:
Epstein's Estate Epstein's estate Estates of Warhol Bayti Real Estate Investment Company AMF Estate Management The Trump Marks Real Estate Corp Trump Marks Real Estate LLC YORKTOWN REAL ESTATE LLC TRUMP VINEYARD ESTATES MANAGER CORP Estate of Gene Kelly OCEANSIDE PALMS ESTATE CORP Creque Estates, Inc. Court having jurisdiction of the administration of my estate

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization Town of Palm Beach
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Alda Creque
President
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00037511.pdf

This document contains an email chain among likely DOJ or FBI personnel (names redacted) discussing a Virgin Islands Daily News article from June 2020. The article details an agreement between the VI Attorney General Denise George and the Epstein Estate regarding a victim compensation fund. The internal emails express confusion and inquiry regarding a specific clause in the agreement that promises 'Access to counseling and referral services through the FBI Victim Services program,' as the senders indicate FBI HQ and the Victim Services Division (VSD) were unaware of this arrangement.

Email chain and news article
2025-12-25

EFTA00035803.pdf

This document is a Memorandum of Investigation from the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (New York Field Office), case number 2019-010614. It details a conversation between an OIG Senior Counsel and attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP. Weingarten informed the OIG that Epstein's estate has invoked attorney-client privilege and refuses to be interviewed by the OIG regarding the deceased inmate Jeffrey Epstein.

Memorandum of investigation (department of justice, office of the inspector general)
2025-12-25

EFTA00031505.pdf

This document is an email thread from November 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death, discussing scheduling logistics. An unidentified sender informs a recipient that they have a morning meeting with attorneys for Epstein's estate and will subsequently join sessions involving 'Maccow' (likely Lesley Maccow/Groff) and 'Fedora'.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00029752.pdf

This document is an email dated January 17, 2020, sent to an individual associated with USANYS (US Attorney's Office). The sender asks if the recipient's team is aware of the lawsuit filed by the Virgin Islands government against Jeffrey Epstein's estate and the 1953 Trust, specifically noting the suit seeks to void fraudulent asset transfers. The sender offers to circulate the complaint if needed.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00024753.pdf

This document is an email chain dated March 3 and 4, 2020, between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The emails circulate a New York Times article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein's Mystery Bank Came Alive After His Death,' which reports that an entity named Southern Country International received millions of dollars from Epstein's estate in December 2019.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00020917.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 2019 involving the forwarding of a victim allegation to the FBI. A sender, identifying as a close friend of a 17-year-old victim and her guardian from Calderitas, Mexico, claims the victim was abused by Jeffrey Epstein at his New York townhome and Virgin Islands property. The email chain discusses a related call received on an 800 line from New Mexico, referred by the State AG, and the victim's intent to register a claim against Epstein's estate.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00019915.pdf

This document is a summary of a trial preparation interview conducted on June 7, 2021, by the USAO with a witness/victim in the Epstein case. The notes detail that the witness received a $3.5 million award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which she used for housing, transportation, and family support. The witness reported mental health struggles involving dreams of Epstein and disclosed that she lied about her age (claiming to be 17 when younger) to a redacted individual (presumably Epstein or an associate) while dating.

Interview memorandum / trial preparation note
2025-12-25

EFTA00018099.pdf

A heavily redacted email document from January 16, 2020. The visible portion contains an email discussing a lawsuit filed by the Virgin Islands government against Jeffrey Epstein's estate and the '1953 Trust'. The lawsuit seeks to void allegedly fraudulent transfers of assets to the trust. The sender offers to provide the complaint and details to the recipient's team and executives.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00016865.pdf

This document is the Last Will and Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein, executed on January 27, 2012. It directs the transfer of all his property to 'The Jeffrey E. Epstein Trust One' (a pour-over will) and appoints Darren K. Indyke, Joseph Pagano, and Lawrence Newman as Executors, with Jes Staley and Andrew Farkas named as successors. The will includes broad powers for the Executors and a strict 'in terrorem' clause to disinherit any beneficiary who contests the validity of the will or the trust.

Legal document (last will and testament)
2025-12-25

EFTA00015992.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 2019 in which an individual claiming to be a close friend of a 17-year-old victim from Calderitas, Mexico, reports abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. The email details that the abuse occurred at Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands and requests to register a claim against Epstein's estate. The email was forwarded internally within an organization (likely a financial institution or legal firm) with instructions to send the information to the FBI.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00011363.pdf

This document is an email from attorney Sigrid McCawley dated March 18, 2020, discussing an indemnification action filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the USVI. McCawley notes that the filing contains statements contradicting Maxwell's previous sworn depositions regarding financial support from Jeffrey Epstein and lists companies she was employed by which were not previously disclosed. The email mentions that ABC is preparing a news story on the matter.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00003109.pdf

This document is a Warranty Deed dated August 13, 1981, transferring ownership of Little St. James Island (No. 6B Red Hook Quarter, U.S. Virgin Islands) from the Creque family (represented by Creque Estates, Inc.) to Arch W. Cummin of New York City for the sum of $470,000. It lists numerous members of the Creque family as grantors and includes recording stamps from the St. Thomas Recorder's Office dated September 3, 1981. This deed establishes the ownership history of the island prior to Jeffrey Epstein's acquisition.

Warranty deed
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00017753.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane' by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Jane's civil lawsuits filed in January 2020 against Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein's estate with the assistance of attorney Mr. Glassman.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001828.jpg

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a deadline extension for electronic discovery in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government cites delays with an outside vendor processing data from electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2019. The letter details the volume of discovery produced so far (350,000+ pages) and outlines the timeline of data seizure, privilege review by Epstein's estate, and subsequent warrant acquisition.

Legal correspondence (letter motion to court)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001818.jpg

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension (until Nov 23, 2020) to produce electronic discovery in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The delay is attributed to an outside vendor needing more time to process data from electronic devices seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in NY and the Virgin Islands in 2019. The letter details the history of the data seizure, privilege reviews requested by Epstein's estate, and mentions that over 350,000 pages of discovery have already been produced.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter motion)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019318.jpg

This legal document, dated May 18, 2020, is a filing arguing against defendant Maxwell's request to stay discovery in a civil case. The author contends that Maxwell has failed to justify the stay based on a parallel criminal investigation and that a potential claims resolution program involving co-defendant Epstein's Estate does not require litigation to be paused. The filing cites court transcripts and case law to support the position that discovery should proceed, as it may even be necessary to facilitate settlement.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016487.jpg

This legal document is a judicial ruling from a case dated August 10, 2022. The judge permits the defense to ask a witness, Mr. Glassman, a single, specific question about whether he told the government that he had informed another witness, Jane, that her testimony would benefit her civil case against Ms. Maxwell and Epstein's estate. The judge deems this question relevant for potential impeachment, as it could suggest a motive for Jane's testimony.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010132.jpg

This legal document, page 7 of a court filing from April 6, 2012, analyzes a July 8, 2011 Memorandum of Law concerning the law firm Brune & Richard. It argues that the firm's lawyers had no professional duty to disclose information discovered in March and May because the relevant ethics rules require 'actual knowledge,' which the lawyers lacked. The discussion is framed by the receipt of a letter from 'juror Conrad' on June 20 and the adversarial nature of the legal system.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009453.jpg

This document is an exhibit (A-5849) filed on Feb 24, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), but originates from a 2012 filing in the 'United States v. Daugerdas' case (1:09-cr-00581-WHP). The text analyzes the ethical conduct of lawyers from the firm Brune & Richard regarding their knowledge of misconduct by 'juror Conrad' and whether they had a duty to disclose information discovered in March and May 2011. It concludes that the lawyers did not have 'actual knowledge' requiring disclosure under Rules 3.3(b) and 3.5(d).

Legal exhibit / court opinion or report
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005174.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the procedures for a compensation program for claimants alleging sexual abuse by Epstein. An Administrator will evaluate each claim based on various factors, including the nature of the abuse and the claimant's credibility, even without corroborating documentation. The document details the process for making a confidential compensation offer and notes that claimants will have an opportunity to be heard by the Administrator, with accommodations made due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011708.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues that witness memories are faded and contaminated by media, and that Jeffrey Epstein manipulated everyone, including Maxwell. The text asserts that accusers were motivated or manipulated by civil attorneys seeking money and notes that testifying witnesses received millions of dollars from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Fund with minimal vetting.

Court transcript (opening statement)
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016780.jpg

This document is page A40 of 46 from a Public Financial Disclosure Report (OGE Form 278e) filed by Donald J. Trump. It details the ownership structure of various entities including golf clubs, real estate holdings (1290 Avenue of the Americas), and operational LLCs, listing DJT Holdings LLC, The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and 'Trump Family Members' as primary owners. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee; there is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or associated entities on this specific page.

Oge form 278e (public financial disclosure report) / house oversight committee record
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016777.jpg

This document is page A37 of 46 from Donald J. Trump's OGE Form 278e financial disclosure. It lists the ownership structures, percentages, and parent entities for various Trump organizations, specifically those numbered 441 through 451. The entities primarily relate to developments in Toronto, Trump Tower management, Vineyard Estates, and Virginia acquisitions, with ownership often held through DJT Holdings LLC or The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust.

Government financial disclosure form (oge form 278e)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016757.jpg

Page A17 from Donald J. Trump's OGE Form 278e financial disclosure. The document lists ownership structures for various entities including The Trump Entrepreneur Initiative (formerly Trump University), The Trump Follies LLC, The Trump Hotel Corp, and Trump International Golf Links - Doonbeg. It details minority shareholders Jonathan Spitalny and Michael Sexton in the Entrepreneur Initiative, as well as the holding structure of the Trump Organization and related real estate entities. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.

Oge form 278e (financial disclosure report)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016676.jpg

The document is a table listing rankings 81 through 100 of the 'Top 100 Palm Beach Accounts by Average Monthly Consumption' for FY 07-08. It details water usage metrics (CCF and Gallons) and average monthly bills for various high-profile residents and entities in Palm Beach, including Eugene Applebaum, Martin Gruss, and Jeffry Picower. The document indicates that the Top 100 accounts were responsible for 35% of total consumption and 42% of total revenue for Palm Beach during this period.

Government record / utility consumption report
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$1,049.12
1 transactions
Net Flow
-$1,049.12
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
2025-11-07 Paid Estate Palm Beach Utilities $1,049.12 Average Monthly Bill View
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity