this courthouse
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001056.jpg
This document is page 115 of a court transcript from April 1, 2021, involving a defense attorney arguing before a judge regarding bail conditions for a female client (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell). The attorney rebuts the government's claim that the client is a flight risk or 'hiding out,' arguing instead that she has been actively litigating civil cases since 2015 and denying impropriety regarding Mr. Epstein. The attorney also notes that a plaintiff seeking millions of dollars had spoken earlier in the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00001052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is arguing a point by citing past high-profile cases like Madoff, Dreier, and Esposito. The judge interrupts to question the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections, which distinguishes them from the current case. Mr. Cohen admits they did not, highlighting that the current defendant's foreign ties are a key point of contention.
DOJ-OGR-00000656.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding where an unnamed speaker argues for the court's supervision of an investigation into components of the Department of Justice. The speaker highlights the 'dreadful' and 'disgraceful' conditions of the local jail where Jeffrey Epstein was held, claiming they are worse than at Guantanamo. The core argument is that court oversight is necessary to maintain public confidence in the justice system and to uncover the truth about the situation.
DOJ-OGR-00001929.jpg
This document is page 52 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The defense attorney is arguing for the client's release on strict conditions, refuting the government's claim that the client is a flight risk or has been 'hiding out.' The attorney highlights that the client has been actively litigating civil cases since 2015 and denying impropriety regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001925.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, where an attorney, Mr. Cohen, references past high-profile cases (Madoff, Dreier, Esposito) to support his arguments. The presiding judge questions the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections. Mr. Cohen concedes that they did not, highlighting a key factual distinction from the current case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity