This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, where an attorney, Mr. Cohen, references past high-profile cases (Madoff, Dreier, Esposito) to support his arguments. The presiding judge questions the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections. Mr. Cohen concedes that they did not, highlighting a key factual distinction from the current case.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Madoff | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned as an example of a high-profile case reviewed for precedent: "cases like Madoff".
|
| Dreier | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned as an example of a high-profile case reviewed for precedent: "cases like Dreier".
|
| Esposito | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned as an example of a high-profile case involving organized crime: "cases like Esposito".
|
| Judge Marrero | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who ruled in the Esposito case in 2018.
|
| Mr. Cohen | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, presumably an attorney, arguing a point before the court.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
How Mr. Cohen addresses the presiding judge of the court.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where past high-profile cases were reviewed.
|
"Mr. Cohen, just before you move to that, the three cases that you cited -- Esposito, Dreier, Madoff -- factually did any of those cases involve defendants with substantial international and foreign connections?"Source
"No, I don't believe they did."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,592 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document