United States
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021108.jpg
This legal document analyzes the application of the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act (WSLA) by referencing the 1953 Supreme Court case *Bridges v. U.S.* It details how Bridges was charged for a false statement regarding Communist Party membership in his 1945 naturalization application and how the Supreme Court interpreted the WSLA's scope. The document criticizes a District Court for mischaracterizing the *Bridges* opinion concerning the WSLA's legislative history and the nature of fraud.
DOJ-OGR-00021107.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, arguing for a 'categorical approach' to interpreting statutes of limitation, specifically §3283. It cites several Supreme Court precedents, most notably U.S. v. Noveck (1926), to support the argument that an extended statute of limitations for fraud-related offenses only applies when fraud is an essential element of the crime itself, not when it is merely alleged as 'mere surplusage' in an indictment for a different crime like perjury or tax evasion.
DOJ-OGR-00021092.jpg
This document is page 45 of a legal brief filed on February 28, 2023 (Case 22-1426). It argues that the government must adhere to plea bargains and immunity agreements, specifically referencing a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and arguing that 'Count Six' falls within the timeframe of that NPA. It cites case law (Harvey, Annabi) to support the argument that the government is held to a high standard regarding nationwide immunity promises and that new charges must be 'sufficiently distinct' from those covered by a plea.
DOJ-OGR-00021078.jpg
This legal document argues that the Appellant, identified as Maxwell, is a third-party beneficiary of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein and therefore has standing to enforce it. The brief contends that a District Court erred in its ruling that the NPA's immunity for co-conspirators only applied to the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL), arguing the agreement's plain text referring to "the United States" should bind all U.S. Attorney's Offices, including the one in the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY).
DOJ-OGR-00021076.jpg
This page from a 2023 court filing analyzes the text of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It details that the FBI investigated Epstein for offenses committed between 2001 and 2007, and that the NPA was intended to 'globally' resolve his liability. The text explains that federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida was deferred in favor of state prosecution by Florida, provided Epstein abided by the terms.
DOJ-OGR-00021060.jpg
This document is page xii of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It lists various court cases and federal statutes (U.S. Constitution and U.S. Code) that are cited as legal precedent or authority within the main document, along with the corresponding page numbers where they are referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00020925.jpg
This document is a juror questionnaire, identified as Juror ID 50, from a legal case filed on March 9, 2022. The juror denies that they or any close relations have ever been the subject of an investigation, a victim of a crime, or a party to a legal dispute with the United States government or its agencies, including the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00020917.jpg
This document is a schedule provided to prospective Juror ID 50 regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the timeline for jury selection (Nov 16-19, 2021) and the trial start date (Nov 29, 2021), clarifying that the jury will not be sequestered. It also emphasizes the civic duty of jury service, stating that only extraordinary hardship will be accepted as an excuse.
DOJ-OGR-00020889.jpg
This Reuters news article reports on the perspectives of jurors from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Juror Scotty David describes how another juror, Carolyn, was influenced by a fellow juror's story of growing up in a similar socioeconomic background, leading her to believe girls in her neighborhood could have been victimized by people like Epstein and Maxwell. David also states his own conviction that Maxwell was complicit and not merely a scapegoat for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00020886.jpg
This document is a printout of a Reuters news article dated January 5, 2022, titled 'Some Ghislaine Maxwell jurors initially doubted accusers, juror says' by Luc Cohen. It was submitted as an exhibit in court cases (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN and Case 22-1426), as evidenced by the header stamps and the DOJ Bates stamp at the bottom.
DOJ-OGR-00020800.jpg
This document is a page from a plea agreement involving Epstein, detailing sentencing timelines and conditions regarding 'gain time' during incarceration in Florida. It outlines confidentiality expectations and stipulates that if Epstein fulfills the agreement, the United States will not prosecute named co-conspirators and will suspend federal Grand Jury investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00020797.jpg
This page is part of a legal agreement detailing the terms under which the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, R. Alexander Acosta, agrees to defer federal prosecution of Epstein. The deferral is in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, contingent upon Epstein's compliance with the agreement's conditions. The document also outlines the procedure for initiating federal prosecution, including a notice period, should Epstein violate the terms.
DOJ-OGR-00020796.jpg
This document is the first page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines that the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney's Office investigated Epstein, leading to state charges for solicitation of prostitution. Simultaneously, the US Attorney's Office and FBI investigated federal offenses committed between 2001 and 2007, specifically focusing on conspiracy to traffic minor females across state lines for prostitution and illicit sexual conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00020767.jpg
This legal document is a court order from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 16, 2021, denying a request by the defendant, Maxwell, for an evidentiary hearing. The Court rules that a hearing is unnecessary because the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in question is clear and in writing, unlike cases involving ambiguous oral agreements. The Court also orders the Government to confirm within one week its disclosure of any evidence that might support Maxwell's interpretation of the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00020747.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely an indictment, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines a conspiracy between Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and others to entice individuals across state lines for illegal sexual activity. The document details specific overt acts, including Maxwell's participation in group sexual encounters with a minor victim in New York and Florida between 1994 and 1997, and the enticement of that same victim to travel for sexual abuse in 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00020630.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket report for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal proceedings and filings between July 7, 2020, and July 9, 2020. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding scheduling and Speedy Trial Act exclusions, notices of appearance for defense attorneys, a motion for pro hac vice admission, the filing of a superseding indictment, and logistical details for a remote arraignment and bail hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00020577.jpg
This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020535.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330), covering filings and orders between October 15 and October 20, 2021. Key activities include scheduling motions regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence), filings related to 'Motions in Limine' and 'Voir Dire' (jury selection), and the scheduling of a telephone conference for October 21, 2021, to discuss jury selection logistics. The document also lists specific public access phone numbers for the proceedings and explicitly prohibits recording.
DOJ-OGR-00020485.jpg
This document is Page 8 of a criminal judgment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2022. It outlines the 'Schedule of Payments' for criminal monetary penalties, ordering an immediate lump sum payment of $300.00. It also stipulates that further payments will commence 30 days after her release from imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00020434.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from October 2021 detailing pre-trial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records various filings related to jury selection (voir dire), motions in limine, and Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (rape shield law), as well as the scheduling of a telephone conference. The document also notes the deletion of an incorrectly filed document and provides public access information for court proceedings while warning against recording.
DOJ-OGR-00020394.jpg
This document is a court docket page from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the formal appearance of her defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The document also outlines logistics for public access to the hearing via telephone and addresses victim rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00018707.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that a person named Maxwell invited her to an island, but she declined, stating she was only 14. Despite knowing her age, Maxwell allegedly continued to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018432.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on an incident where Kate missed a flight from the US to London, met a man named Kevin, and went to his home. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to this line of questioning on grounds of relevance, leading the judge to call for a sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00018431.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on Kate's relationship with Ghislaine and Epstein, confirming she spent time with them in London and the United States. The questioner also probes inconsistencies in Kate's testimony regarding her age at marriage and references an incident where she failed to return to London from the U.S. while her husband was waiting for her.
DOJ-OGR-00018419.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her past involvement in a reality show in Hollywood about 19 years prior, her subsequent move to the United States, and the visa she obtained to work in the music industry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity