United States
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002040.jpg
This document is a letter of support, filed on December 14, 2020, for a bail application for an individual named Ghislaine. The anonymous author attests to Ghislaine's good character, refutes allegations that she was hiding from law enforcement, and pledges to sign a $3.5 million bond, representing all of their personal assets, to secure her release. The author expresses complete confidence that Ghislaine will remain in the United States to face the charges against her.
DOJ-OGR-00002034.jpg
This document is a letter of support for Ghislaine Maxwell, likely submitted for a bail application in her federal case. The author, a close friend, portrays Maxwell as a dedicated family person who was not evading law enforcement but was terrified and hiding from intense, threatening media scrutiny. The author vouches for Maxwell's character and asserts she will face her trial if released, arguing for a non-custodial environment to prepare her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002031.jpg
This document is a redacted character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The unnamed author argues that Maxwell has strong ties to the US, including her husband, and expresses distress over her incarceration conditions, specifically citing over 150 days of solitary confinement. The author pledges to stay in contact and provide support if Maxwell is granted bail to help her prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002026.jpg
This document is a redacted letter of support filed on December 14, 2020, as part of a bail application for Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The unnamed author attests to Maxwell's character, claims she was 'laying low' due to vigilantes rather than hiding from authorities, and offers to co-sign a $1.5 million bond. Furthermore, the author commits to living with Maxwell 24/7 in a New York residence to ensure she does not flee if released.
DOJ-OGR-00002025.jpg
This legal document is a declaration from an unnamed individual defending Ghislaine against public accusations and media reports. The author attests that Ghislaine was not a fugitive but was forced into hiding due to a dangerous media frenzy, which included a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun newspaper, and threats on social media. The author asserts Ghislaine's consistent claims of innocence and her desire for a fair legal process to clear her name.
DOJ-OGR-00002021.jpg
This document is the final page of a declaration filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The redacted author explains their initial reluctance to co-sign due to media aggression but expresses a firm belief in Maxwell's innocence regarding Epstein's crimes and her intent to stand trial in the U.S. The author concludes by offering prayers for Maxwell, justice, due process, and Epstein's victims.
DOJ-OGR-00002006.jpg
This document is page 34 of a legal filing from December 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details expert opinions from Mr. Perry (UK law) and William Julié (French law), both arguing that Maxwell would be unable to resist extradition to the US from either the UK or France, and would be unlikely to receive bail in the UK if she absconded there. These arguments appear designed to support a request for bail in the US by minimizing her flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00002005.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell should be granted bail conditions involving an extradition waiver, citing legal precedents (Salvagno, Karni, Chen, Khashoggi) where such waivers were accepted as assurances against flight. The document states Maxwell has obtained expert reports from French and UK experts (specifically David Perry regarding the UK) concluding that she would be unable to resist extradition back to the US if she fled to those countries after signing a waiver.
DOJ-OGR-00002004.jpg
This document is page 32 of a defense filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text argues that Maxwell is not a flight risk due to intense media scrutiny, the global pandemic, and her willingness to sign irrevocable extradition waivers for the UK and France. It cites legal precedent (US v. Cirillo) supporting the use of extradition waivers as a condition for release.
DOJ-OGR-00001999.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed Dec 14, 2020) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has been subjected to unprecedented pre-trial publicity. It includes a bar graph titled 'All U.S. Media Coverage Comparison' demonstrating that in the 90 days following her July 2020 arrest, Maxwell received more national media mentions (over 6,000 articles) than Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, El Chapo, and Keith Raniere combined. The top portion of the document contains redacted text referencing Ex. A.
DOJ-OGR-00001995.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 14, 2020, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense. It references a 'Macalvins report' used to refute government claims that Maxwell's finances are opaque, asserting that she and her spouse have fully disclosed assets totaling approximately $22.5 million, which is offered as the bond amount. A footnote contains redactions regarding the name of a specific bank to protect privacy or security.
DOJ-OGR-00001992.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from December 14, 2020, argues for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. It details several substantial financial pledges from her 'family and friends' and a security company, including a $3.5 million bond from one individual and a $1 million bond from the company. The document uses these pledges, totaling over $4.5 million, and quotes from the sureties to demonstrate strong community support and to argue that Ms. Maxwell is not a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00001991.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on a $22.5 million bond. It details that her spouse is pledging all his assets (three properties worth ~$8 million) and that friends and family, including one individual pledging her entire $1.5 million retirement 'nest-egg', are acting as sureties. The text emphasizes the financial devastation these individuals would face if Maxwell fled, arguing this guarantees her compliance.
DOJ-OGR-00001990.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Document 97) from December 14, 2020, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. It focuses on her strong family ties and marriage, citing redacted exhibits (B, C, F) that attest to her loving relationship with her husband and commitment to the US. The text explains that her spouse (whose name is redacted) initially did not co-sign her bail due to fear of 'ferocious media aggression' but is now coming forward with all their assets due to concerns over her treatment at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00001989.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell being a flight risk. It highlights a letter from her spouse (whose name is redacted) describing their domestic life in the US over the previous four years and asserting that the criminal charges do not resemble the person he knows. The filing also references Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death in 2019 as the catalyst for a 'media frenzy' affecting the family.
DOJ-OGR-00001988.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It asserts that Maxwell has deep ties to the U.S., specifically through her spouse (whose name is redacted), and is supported by letters from family and friends willing to post significant financial assets as sureties. The defense argues these letters counter the 'cruel caricature' of Maxwell in the press and address the Court's previous concerns regarding her lack of dependents or ties to the country.
DOJ-OGR-00001987.jpg
This legal document is part of a motion arguing for bail for Ms. Maxwell. It refutes the court's initial reasons for denying bail by listing the court's findings—such as lack of family ties, unclear finances, and being a flight risk due to her French citizenship—and claims that new evidence demonstrates these concerns are unfounded. The document asserts that this new evidence, which could not be presented at the initial hearing, proves that reasonable bail conditions can be set to ensure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001984.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (dated Dec 14, 2020) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text argues that Maxwell has been subjected to unprecedented negative media coverage (more than Weinstein or El Chapo) but remains committed to fighting the charges in the US rather than fleeing. It emphasizes her strong ties to her spouse (whose name is redacted) and argues that continued detention under 'oppressive conditions' impairs her ability to prepare her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001982.jpg
This legal document is part of a renewed bail application for Ms. Maxwell, submitted by her defense team. It presents new evidence to the Court, including letters of support from her spouse and friends, a detailed financial report from Macalvins Limited showing assets of approximately $22.5 million for a proposed bond, and statements to counter the government's narrative that she was a flight risk. The defense argues this new information, unavailable at the initial hearing, demonstrates her strong ties to the U.S. and justifies her release on bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001980.jpg
This document serves as page 8 of a legal filing (Document 97) from December 14, 2020, outlining a $28.5 million bail package proposed by Ghislaine Maxwell. The package includes a $22.5 million bond co-signed by Maxwell and her spouse, secured by all their U.S. assets, and $5 million in additional bonds co-signed by seven redacted close friends and family members. Additionally, an unnamed security company offered to post a $1 million bond, which the filing notes is an unprecedented action for a security firm.
DOJ-OGR-00001979.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement from Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team, filed on December 14, 2020, in support of a renewed motion for her release on bail. The memorandum argues that new information, including evidence of US family ties, a detailed financial report, and irrevocable waivers of extradition from the UK and France, addresses the court's previous concerns about flight risk. It also attacks the weakness of the government's case and proposes an 'expansive set of bail conditions' to ensure her presence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001974.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated December 14, 2020. The filing argues for the reconsideration of a court's bail decision concerning Ms. Maxwell, proposing she be granted bail under strict conditions. The arguments outlined include her deep family ties, her devotion to her spouse, financial transparency, and claims that she was not hiding from authorities but rather protecting herself from media and physical threats.
DOJ-OGR-00001962.jpg
This legal document from December 10, 2020, details a court's analysis of arguments from Ms. Maxwell's defense. The court dismisses the defense's claim that Maxwell is not a flight risk, finding her pre-indictment contact with the government insignificant and distinguishing her case from the legal precedent of U.S. v. Friedman. The court also suggests that Ms. Maxwell may not have fully grasped the severity of the charges against her until after she was formally indicted.
DOJ-OGR-00001961.jpg
This document is page 84 of a court transcript filed on December 10, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court is arguing that Maxwell poses a flight risk due to her substantial financial resources, foreign connections, lack of ties to the US, and the seriousness of the charges. The text notes that Maxwell's defense argues she did not flee after Epstein's arrest despite knowing she was under investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00001960.jpg
This document is page 83 of a court transcript filed on December 10, 2020, regarding the bail determination for Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The court argues that Maxwell poses a significant flight risk due to her awareness of the strong case against her, her substantial international ties, her French citizenship (noting non-extradition policies), and her extraordinary financial resources. The court dismisses her defenses regarding the non-prosecution agreement at this stage of the bail hearing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity