| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
This document is a Victoria's Secret employment application dated August 4, 2005, for a 'Brand Rep / Sale' position with an expected salary of $6.50/hour. The applicant's personal identifying information and employment history are heavily redacted, though the form notes they had lived at their current address for only 4 days at the time of application. The document contains multiple fax headers from 2006, indicating it was transmitted between parties including 'Dell Riley Kiraly' and Victoria's Secret corporate offices, and was later released as part of a 2017 DOJ public records request.
This document is an FAA Registry record for the aircraft with tail number N908JE, accessed on January 3, 2006. The aircraft, a 1969 Boeing 727-31, is registered to a corporation named JEGE INC, located in Wilmington, Delaware. The record confirms the aircraft's registration status is valid, with its certificate issued on January 25, 2001.
This document is an FAA aircraft registration record for the tail number N909JE, retrieved via a public records request on January 3, 2006. The aircraft is a 1974 Gulfstream G1159B registered to Hyperion Air Inc., a corporation located in Wilmington, Delaware. The record includes details on the aircraft's specifications, manufacturer, engine type, and key certification dates.
This document, an excerpt from an Albuquerque Tribune Online article, details several large financial contributions to a political figure named Richardson. It outlines donations from political groups like the New Democrat Network, corporations like Peters Corporation, and individuals such as Gerald Peters and Jerry Perenchio. The article also notes a significant transfer of funds from Richardson's own congressional account and mentions his past legal battle to allow such transfers.
This document is an FAA aircraft registration record for the tail number N909JE, retrieved on January 3, 2006. It shows the aircraft is a 1974 Gulfstream G1159B owned by Hyperion Air Inc., a corporation based in Wilmington, Delaware. The current registration certificate was issued on March 15, 1994.
This legal document argues that the risks of COVID-19 to inmates in correctional facilities have significantly increased, citing a doubling of cases and a 73% increase in deaths in the last month. It highlights that the virus is now spreading in the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), where Ms. Maxwell was recently transferred by the Bureau of Prisons. The document uses prior court opinions and news reports to support the claim of heightened risk and the inevitability of community spread in such facilities.
This document is page 7 of a defense motion filed on July 10, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense argues that Maxwell is not a danger to the community (unlike Epstein), that COVID-19 poses a severe health risk in detention hindering her defense, and that she is not a flight risk due to her U.S. citizenship and lack of criminal record. It asserts she stayed in the U.S. and maintained contact with the government after Epstein's arrest rather than fleeing.
This is page 2 of a legal memorandum filed by the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her ties to the US, family support, and citizenship status to argue against flight risk. It counters the government's position that she was 'hiding' and argues that detention is not warranted.
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, argues that an unnamed defendant is a significant flight risk and should be denied bail. The prosecution asserts that since an indictment against Epstein was unsealed in July 2019, the defendant has been actively hiding, using an alias ('G Max'), changing phone numbers, and purchasing a 156-acre property in New Hampshire with cash through an anonymized LLC. The document concludes that due to her international connections, financial means, and lack of ties to the U.S., no bail conditions could reasonably assure her appearance in court.
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for the detention of the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines her flight risk due to her 'extensive international ties,' noting she holds citizenship and passports for the US, UK, and France. It cites CBP records showing frequent travel, including 15 international flights in the prior three years to locations like Japan and Qatar.
This document is the first page of the Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. The prosecution argues that Maxwell poses an extreme flight risk due to her wealth, three passports, foreign citizenship, and lack of ties to the US, and requests she be detained pending trial for her alleged role in partnering with Jeffrey Epstein to exploit minors.
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing against the government's claim that she is a flight risk. The defense asserts that she chose to remain in the United States to fight the charges and has offered to renounce her British and French citizenships and place her and her spouse's assets into a monitored account to secure bond.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she was living openly in her New Hampshire home, her lawyers were in communication with the government, and she had not left the U.S. for years. The document attributes her low profile to intense media harassment, citing a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun tabloid as a reason for her to seek privacy for safety.
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021, detailing Ghislaine Maxwell's attempts to secure bail. It outlines the court's reasons for detaining her—flight risk due to foreign citizenship (France, Britain) and unclear finances—and the defense's counter-arguments, including an offer to renounce her foreign citizenship and the assertion that witness testimony related to Jeffrey Epstein rather than her. The text notes that despite these arguments, the judge denied bail for a second time.
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8-13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment, notices of appearance for Maxwell's attorneys, and memoranda regarding her detention. A significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules Maxwell's remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, and outlines procedures for public and media access during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8 to July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear on Maxwell's behalf, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The order specifies how the public, press, victims, and legal counsel can access the proceedings via teleconference and limited in-person viewing.
This document is a court docket from Case 21-58, detailing legal proceedings related to Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions and notices for attorney appearances on behalf of Maxwell, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, specifies how the public, press, and involved parties can access the hearing via teleconference and limited in-person viewing due to COVID-19 restrictions.
This page contains a transcript of jury instructions from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge explains the legal distinction between conspiracy charges and substantive charges. The text specifically details Instruction No. 13 regarding Count Two, citing Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422, which defines the federal crime of enticement to engage in illegal sexual activity involving interstate travel.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus describes their professional affiliations with several major psychological organizations, including the Association for Psychological Science, the Western Psychological Association, and the American Psychological Association, highlighting past presidencies and other leadership roles within these groups.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about allowing a witness to testify remotely via WebEx. Counsel argues the witness is unavailable due to a positive COVID test, referencing the case United States v. Al-Fawwaz. The court accepts the reason for unavailability and anticipates permitting the remote testimony.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Ms. Moe and the Court about a rebuttal witness. Ms. Moe argues that an exhibit, containing a picture and date of birth, was disclosed to the defense as soon as it was received and that the information is already known to the defendant. The Court considers the procedural aspects of calling the person as a rebuttal witness.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the customs clearance procedures for flights, specifically addressing the requirement to clear customs when departing from St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. The witness explains the difference between pre-clearing customs in St. Thomas versus clearing upon arrival in the mainland United States.
This document is page 16 of a court filing (Document 688) filed on June 29, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It shows page 13 of a completed questionnaire for Juror ID: 2. The juror answered 'No' to questions regarding prior investigations (Q24), being a victim of a crime (Q25), or having legal disputes with US agencies such as the FBI or NYPD (Q26).
This document is a page from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), specifically a schedule information sheet for potential jurors. It outlines the dates for jury selection (Nov 16-19, 2021) and the start of the trial (Nov 29, 2021). The document clarifies that the jury will not be sequestered and sets a high bar ('extraordinary personal or financial hardship') for being excused from service.
This document is a court order from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Judge rules that while the Defendant challenges whether Maria Farmer, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant meet the statutory definition of 'crime victims' under the CVRA, the Court has broad discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to consider information at sentencing. Consequently, the Court permits these four women to provide written submissions for the sentencing record but denies their requests to make in-person statements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity