United States
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal agreement modification | An addendum was created to modify paragraph 7 of a Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United S... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Lawsuit | Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, where Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are petitioners against th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Argument presented that Ms. Maxwell has standing to enforce a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) as ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | The United States filed a sealed motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | United States Courthouse, N... | View |
| N/A | Trial | The trial of United States v. Maxwell, during which Juror 50 served on the jury. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) where he agreed to a sentence of eighteen ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal ruling | The Supreme Court ruling in Giglio v. United States, which held that an Assistant United Stated A... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Epstein agrees to waive his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial and his Fifth Amendment right... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Maxwell | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal motion | The United States shall make a motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem for the identifi... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | The ongoing legal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing proceeding | The Government proposes scheduling a sentencing proceeding approximately three to four months fro... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Trial | The ongoing legal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential war/conflict between the US and Iran. | Iran/Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's guilty plea and other penalties and concessions. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A hearing was held in the District of Arrest where the government moved for detention and the def... | District of Arrest | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was made with Epstein, which is argued to provide immunity to h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The legal case United States v. Rooney, 37 F.3d 847, 855 (2d Cir. 1994) is cited as precedent. | 2d Cir. | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government filed a Rule 48 motion for leave to dismiss a charge against a defendant in the ca... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding / discussion | Analysis of legal principles regarding the setting aside of a Non-Prosecution Agreement, specific... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Consultation with the State Attorney's Office regarding Epstein's case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Struggle for the eastern Mediterranean between US and USSR. | Eastern Mediterranean | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential military interventions in the Central Command theater. | Middle East | View |
EFTA00030115.pdf
This document is an electronic FOIA request submitted to the FBI on December 6, 2018, by an individual listed as 'Live Attempt' from California. The requester seeks unredacted reports, audiovisual evidence, co-conspirator lists, and emails involving Robert Mueller regarding the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein between 2006 and 2010. The request argues for a fee waiver and expedited processing based on significant public interest and Epstein's alleged ties to high-profile figures including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew.
EFTA00029939.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Marc Weinstein (counsel for the Epstein Estate). The SDNY is inquiring whether the estate asserts attorney-client privilege over a specific computer seized by the Palm Beach Police Department in 2005, noting that the estate had previously asserted privilege over devices seized by the FBI in 2019. The chain includes scheduling logistics for a conference call to discuss these document requests.
EFTA00029796.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and a DOJ Attaché in London regarding negotiations for an in-person interview with a high-profile witness (implied to be Prince Andrew) via Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA). The correspondence focuses on drafting a confidentiality agreement to secure the interview, addressing concerns about the statement being used in civil litigation, and managing public comments from both sides.
EFTA00029675.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Jill Greenfield, a UK partner at Fieldfisher LLP. The correspondence concerns the SDNY's request to interview Greenfield's client, who is believed to be a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails discuss interview logistics, including anonymity, the voluntary nature of the discussion, the composition of the interview team (prosecutors and FBI agents), and the creation of FBI Form 302 reports.
EFTA00029636.pdf
An email dated November 25, 2019, from Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed to Andrew Tomback of White & Case and other redacted recipients. The email provides dial-in information for a conference call regarding the 'Epstein estate', including international numbers and a conference ID.
EFTA00029169.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on August 24, 2021. It commands a redacted individual to appear in court on November 29, 2021, to testify in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell and to produce all records relating to their employment by Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00028775.pdf
An email chain from July 16, 2020, in which Emma Parry, a reporter for The Sun, contacts an unknown recipient (likely law enforcement) to offer information from a source currently in prison. Parry states the source has information on Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, has previously cooperated with the ATF, and named names that The Sun did not publish. Parry asks for advice on how to facilitate the source's cooperation with authorities.
EFTA00027666.pdf
This document is an Opinion and Order from a U.S. District Court case related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details the history of Epstein's sexual abuse of minor girls, including Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, from 1999 to 2007 in Palm Beach, Florida, and internationally. The document outlines the investigation by the PBPD and FBI, and the subsequent discussions and negotiations between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein's legal team from 2006 to 2007, including efforts to secure a plea agreement and manage press coverage.
EFTA00027558.pdf
An email exchange dated May 22, 2020, discussing the possibility of obtaining a T-Visa (for victims of human trafficking) for an unnamed female individual. The subject is currently in the U.S. on a work visa that expires in August 2020. The respondent offers a phone call to explain the process.
EFTA00027293.pdf
This document is a formal request from the U.S. Department of Justice (via the U.S. Embassy in London) to the UK Home Office dated August 4, 2021. It requests expedited assistance in obtaining evidence—specifically school records, a birth certificate, and travel records—regarding a victim/witness for the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes the urgency due to the trial scheduled for November 2021 and references the charges related to the sexual exploitation of minors by Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004.
EFTA00026910.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and legal counsel for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Marc Weinstein and Andy Tomback). The correspondence discusses scheduling a conference call and clarifies the Estate's assertion of attorney-client privilege. Specifically, the SDNY asks if the Estate asserts privilege over a computer originally seized by the Palm Beach Police Department in 2005 (now in FBI possession), to which Weinstein confirms the Estate does assert privilege.
EFTA00026618.pdf
This document is an automated email alert from Critical Mention dated September 10, 2020. The alert highlights a blog post by Suzannah B. Troy that accuses District Attorney Cy Vance and the NYPD of protecting Dr. Robert Hadden. The author draws parallels between this alleged corruption and the powerful enablers that allowed Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to operate.
EFTA00026467.pdf
This Wall Street Journal newsletter from January 26, 2021, highlights the resignation of Apollo Global Management CEO Leon Black following an independent probe into his ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The report revealed Black paid Epstein $148 million for advice, though it stated Black was not involved in Epstein's criminal activities. The newsletter also covers general news including Janet Yellen's confirmation, Dominion Voting Systems suing Rudy Giuliani, and COVID-19 updates.
EFTA00025004.pdf
An FBI Import Form (FD-1036) dated October 19, 2020, referencing a Confidential Human Source Reporting Document (FD-1023). The document links a case involving '2020 Election Influence Threat Assessment' and foreign influence by Israel, Russia, and UAE to a case ID labeled 'EPSTEIN, JEFFREY; CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING'.
EFTA00024502.pdf
This document is a calendar invitation for a Skype meeting scheduled for July 16, 2020, titled 'Epstein NY property.' The meeting was organized by Marc A. Weinstein and included Andrew Tomback among the attendees, with several other participants' names redacted. The document contains standard Skype dial-in instructions for various international locations.
EFTA00024296.pdf
An email dated October 23, 2019, from Marc A. Weinstein to Andrew Tomback (and redacted recipients) with the subject 'Epstein estate'. The visible content consists entirely of automated meeting dial-in instructions for the 'HHR OnlineMeetingCenter' (Hughes Hubbard & Reed), listing international dial-in numbers which are redacted.
EFTA00023791.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (representing Prince Andrew, the Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in July 2020. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding a request for Prince Andrew to sit for a voluntary interview concerning the Epstein investigation. Key points of contention include the confidentiality of the proceedings, allegations of media leaks by US officials (specifically Geoffrey Berman and Audrey Strauss), and the legal mechanisms of the interview (voluntary vs. compelled via MLAT). The SDNY proposes a two-week confidential negotiation period to resolve the impasse.
EFTA00023783.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (counsel for Prince Andrew/Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York in July 2020. The correspondence concerns negotiations for Prince Andrew to provide a voluntary interview to US authorities regarding the Epstein investigation. The US side threatens a compelled interview via MLAT if no voluntary date is set, while the UK side complains about leaks, 'media circus', and seeks strict confidentiality assurances before agreeing to an interview.
EFTA00023289.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice's travel system approving travel for an SDNY employee. The travel is scheduled for February 25-29, 2020, to Beverly Hills, CA, for the specific purpose of conducting a witness interview for the Epstein Investigation (Case ID R20NYS13404).
EFTA00023283.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and Jill Greenfield, a UK lawyer. They are negotiating the terms of an interview for Greenfield's client, a potential witness/victim in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation who may have worked for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence covers logistics, the client's non-suspect status, anonymity concerns, and the presence of a support person (a US lawyer friend) during the proposed London interview.
EFTA00022989.pdf
This document contains notes from a teleconference between U.S. prosecutors/FBI and counsel for Prince Andrew, dated January 10, 2020. The notes outline the government's request for a voluntary, consensual interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The document details the ground rules for such an interview (not recorded, not under oath, but lying is a crime) and discusses his classification as a 'subject' rather than a 'target' or 'witness' at that stage.
EFTA00022344.pdf
An email chain from June 2020 between FBI and NYPD members of the Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding Epstein search warrant documents. The correspondence discusses the compilation of a spreadsheet ('All_NY_seizure_evidence.xlsx') detailing the specific locations within Epstein's NY mansion where devices were recovered. The process was delayed because officers were deployed to assist with riots and looting in Manhattan during the George Floyd protests.
EFTA00022206.pdf
This document is a chapter from a legal textbook or guidance manual titled 'Chapter A7: Mutual Legal Assistance in Cases of Fraud,' released on July 13, 2019. It details the legal framework, international conventions, and statutory powers (such as CICA 2003 and POCA 2002) governing how the UK provides and requests assistance in cross-border fraud investigations, including freezing assets and gathering evidence. The document contains no specific information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or specific criminal events, but rather outlines the laws that would be applicable to such international investigations.
EFTA00022199.pdf
An email from Daniel Cundy (Blackfords LLP) dated August 9, 2020, providing legal reference materials following a phone call. The email attaches extracts regarding Financial Conduct Authority procedures and criminal law fraud procedures. The text discusses legal protections regarding compulsory powers in MLAT (Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty) requests, citing *United States v. Allen* and *Kastigar v. United States* (protection against self-incrimination).
EFTA00021400.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 15, 2019, between defense attorneys Reid Weingarten and Martin G. Weinberg and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the SDNY regarding bail topics for Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution asks specifically about information regarding a passport and whether Epstein holds citizenship or residency in any country other than the United States. Weingarten replies mentioning an 'unexpected potential conflict' and refers to the situation as a 'nightmare,' noting he is on the West Coast.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity