United States
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Puckett
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
co-conspirators of Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Chuong
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PRC
|
High level communications |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assad
|
Political opposition advocacy for sanctions |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial military |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002794.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing by attorney William Julié in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 23, 2021. The filing argues against an extradition request by citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It specifically quotes articles that protect nationals from extradition, emphasizing that nationality should be assessed at the time of the alleged offense.
DOJ-OGR-00002753.jpg
This document is page 6 of a US Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) opposing the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) third bail motion. The prosecution argues that the defendant's offer to renounce her French and British citizenships is "window dressing" and a strategic but meaningless gesture. The document cites correspondence with the French Ministry of Justice confirming that France will not extradite her because she held French nationality at the time of the alleged crimes (1990s and 2016), regardless of current renunciation. It further notes that while UK extradition is not barred by nationality, the process is lengthy, uncertain, and subject to extensive litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing against a defendant's proposed bail package. The prosecution contends that the defendant's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships (French and British) does not sufficiently mitigate the risk of her fleeing the country. The document argues the renunciation's validity is unclear and could be challenged later, and it cites a previous case (United States v. Cohen) where similar offers were deemed insufficient to assure the court that the defendant was not a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00002733.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing dated February 23, 2021, representing Ghislaine Maxwell's introduction to her Third Motion for Release on Bail. In an effort to secure bail, Maxwell proposes two new restrictive conditions: renouncing her French and British citizenships to prevent flight to those countries, and consolidating her and her spouse's assets into a monitored account overseen by a retired federal judge or former US Attorney. She emphasizes her 30-year residency in the US and her desire to prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002711.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Document 148) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 4, 2021. The text constitutes 'Section V. Motion for Accelerated Disclosure of Witness Statements,' where the defense argues they need early access to Jencks Act material to prepare for trial. They cite the age of the allegations (25 years), the lack of electronic records from that era, the location of witnesses in foreign countries, and the logistical difficulties posed by the COVID-19 pandemic as reasons for the request.
DOJ-OGR-00032875.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated April 20, 2006, documents a victim's sworn statement from October 11, 2005. The victim details her initial encounter with Epstein, a massage for which she was paid $200 that ended with him masturbating, and claims this escalated over 'hundreds' of subsequent visits. These later encounters allegedly involved his assistant, Nada Marcinkova, whom Epstein reportedly bragged was his 'Yugoslavian sex slave'.
DOJ-OGR-00005282.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 22, 2021, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, provides a schedule for potential jurors. It details the dates for jury selection in mid-November 2021 and the subsequent six-week trial commencing on November 29, 2021. The document stresses the civic importance of jury duty and clarifies that only extraordinary personal or financial hardship will be considered a valid reason for being excused.
DOJ-OGR-00005266.jpg
This is a court order filed on October 19, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules a telephone conference for October 21, 2021, to discuss jury selection, providing public dial-in numbers while noting a separate line for involved parties (counsel, defendant, victims, family). It also explicitly warns against recording or rebroadcasting the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00005191.jpg
This document is a handwritten page of legal notes from a court filing dated October 12, 2021. It analyzes the legislative history of U.S. federal sex crime statutes, tracing how definitions evolved through various House and Senate proposals in 1989 and 1990. The notes also cite the case of United States v. Roberts to discuss the application of these laws in territorial and maritime jurisdictions.
DOJ-OGR-00005184.jpg
This handwritten legal note analyzes the interpretation of 18 USC §3283, focusing on the definitions of 'sexual abuse' and 'exploitation'. It discusses the Fifth Circuit's 2015 decision in United States v. Dierl, where the court used a broader definition of sexual abuse from 18 USC §3509 to include exploitation. The author notes this legal 'work around' creates a superfluity issue, referencing the 1995 case United States v. Bailey.
DOJ-OGR-00005116.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a subpoena form (AO 89B) filed in a criminal case. It outlines sections of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, detailing the legal requirements for producing documents, serving subpoenas, the geographic scope of service, and the consequences of non-compliance, such as being held in contempt of court. The rules also provide protections for victims when their personal information is sought.
DOJ-OGR-00002785.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 171) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 23, 2021. The defense argues that Maxwell is not a flight risk because she is willing to renounce both her French and British citizenships and waive extradition rights. The text cites a legal opinion by Mr. Julié regarding French extradition law (Article 696-4) to support the claim that she would not be protected from extradition if she fled to France after renouncing citizenship.
DOJ-OGR-00020142.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court argues against granting bail, citing Maxwell's lack of employment ties to the US, significant ties abroad, and a pattern of providing erroneous financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically underreporting her assets in July 2020 by omitting her spouse's assets and trust accounts.
DOJ-OGR-00020141.jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis regarding a defendant's ties to the United States, likely in the context of a bail hearing. The court acknowledges letters of support from the defendant's friends, family, and spouse, which aim to prove her strong connections to the country. However, the court remains unconvinced that she is not a flight risk, highlighting a key contradiction: the defendant now emphasizes her spousal relationship as a significant tie, yet at the time of her arrest, she claimed to be getting divorced from him.
DOJ-OGR-00008728.jpg
This document is page 22 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) dated December 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 15 regarding 'Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity,' specifically defining the 'First Element' and the legal definition of acting 'Knowingly.' It outlines the burden of proof on the government to establish that Maxwell persuaded or coerced individuals to travel in interstate commerce.
DOJ-OGR-00031010.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page for a 17-year-old female located in Lox, Florida. The profile was last logged into on March 5, 2006. Notable content includes the statement "*i already met him *" under the "Who I'd like to meet" section, and a mention of being kicked off a previous profile. The document is part of a Department of Justice public records release (DOJ-OGR-00031010).
DOJ-OGR-00020357.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, details the allegedly abusive and overly restrictive detention conditions of Ms. Maxwell at the MDC. It claims she is subjected to constant, invasive surveillance, has been physically abused by guards, had property damaged, and had private information leaked to the press. The filing argues that these conditions are unwarranted and that her monitored communications with family demonstrate strong ties to the U.S., contradicting claims that she is a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00011694.jpg
This document is a page from the opening statement transcript by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor outlines the prosecution's intent to prove Maxwell's guilt and describes her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as his 'right hand,' 'best friend,' and 'closest associate.' It details Epstein's wealth, properties (Palm Beach, Manhattan, New Mexico, Paris, USVI), and private planes, noting that Maxwell shared in this lifestyle beginning in the early 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.
DOJ-OGR-00005759.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal precedents cited in the main document, including various U.S. court cases, U.S. Constitutional Amendments V and VI, and Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402, and 403. The page is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00005759.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019814.jpg
This document is a page of endnotes (page 326) from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by investigative journalist Edward Jay Epstein (distinct from Jeffrey Epstein). The notes provide citations for chapters 24-26 regarding Edward Snowden's flight to Moscow, his interactions with WikiLeaks, interviews conducted by the author with various Russian and American figures, and historical context regarding Cold War defectors like Lee Harvey Oswald. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation or inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019792.jpg
This document is page 304 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (identified by title and ISBN in the footer), likely authored by Edward Jay Epstein. The text analyzes Edward Snowden's actions, arguing that regardless of his motives (idealism vs. narcissism), his leaks damaged U.S. security and aided foreign powers. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional review or investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019789.jpg
This document is a scanned page (301) from the Epilogue of a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes the impact of Edward Snowden's leaks, crediting him with prompting Congress to modify the Patriot Act regarding domestic privacy while simultaneously criticizing him for damaging long-standing US intelligence methods used against foreign adversaries. It details the mechanics of NSA call chaining and the shift in how billing records are stored.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019786.jpg
This document appears to be page 298 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). It details the operational fallout of the Edward Snowden leaks, specifically how terrorist targets using platforms like Xbox Live, Twitter, and Facebook ceased using these methods ('went dark') after the PRISM program was revealed in June 2013. The text cites NSA officials Richard Ledgett and Admiral Rogers confirming that the leaks resulted in a loss of surveillance capabilities against groups planning attacks in Europe and the US.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019785.jpg
This document appears to be page 297 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename 'Epst' and ISBN), processed as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text discusses the negative impact of Edward Snowden's leaks on U.S. and allied intelligence capabilities, specifically citing former Paris prosecutor François Molins and CIA official Michael Morell. It details how terrorist groups like ISIS shifted to end-to-end encryption (specifically Telegram) to evade PRISM surveillance and mentions the 2014 discovery of ISIS plans to use biological weapons (bubonic plague) against Western targets.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity