| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
This document appears to be page 17 of a political science or foreign policy essay discussing 'Revolutionary Realism.' The text analyzes the paradox of American foreign policy, noting the tension between the U.S. role as a 'revolutionary nation' seeking global transformation and its role as the 'custodian of the international status quo.' It specifically references political instability in the Middle East. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, associates, specific financial transactions, or flight logs.
This page is an excerpt from a political analysis or essay (possibly an attachment in a larger correspondence) discussing the inherent 'revolutionary' nature of American society and its impact on foreign policy. It argues that cultural and economic forces (like the Internet, NGOs, and businesses) undermine conservative regimes in places like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and China, regardless of official government policy. The document bears a House Oversight footer.
A Financial Times article by Gideon Rachman dated June 13, 2011, analyzing a speech by US Defence Secretary Robert Gates. Gates criticized NATO allies for their lack of participation in the Libya intervention and their reliance on US military spending. The article argues that this reluctance signals the end of 'liberal interventionism' and explains why the West is unlikely to intervene in Syria despite atrocities committed by the Syrian army. The document appears to be a clipping included in House Oversight materials.
This document is a scanned page containing a Boston Globe article titled 'Turkey's new challenges' by Stephen Kinzer, dated June 14, 2011. The article discusses the re-election of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, his authoritarian style, and Turkey's role in the Middle East, specifically regarding the influx of Syrian refugees. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031880' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document appears to be page 42 of a larger text, likely a book or geopolitical report, stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes Israel's geopolitical strategy, arguing that as a small nation, it relies on 'cleverness' and managing subordination to great powers like the United States (and historically Persia) to survive. It concludes that reliance on cleverness rather than resources creates a 'perpetual crisis.'
This document appears to be page 41 of a geopolitical analysis or book regarding Israel's strategic security in a post-Soviet world dominated by the United States. The text argues that Israel's existential threat is not Palestinian agitation or regional neighbors like Syria and Egypt, but rather internal division or the rise of a new great power seeking control of the Mediterranean coast. It bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be page 21 of a larger file, containing the conclusion of an article or book review written by Ferguson (likely Niall Ferguson) about Henry Kissinger. The text analyzes US-China relations, contrasting the views of nationalist Chinese writers like Liu Mingfu with Kissinger's hope for a 'Pacific Community.' It includes a significant quote from Richard Nixon predicting China's rise to global leadership. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be page 20 of a larger text, likely a book or long-form article, analyzing Henry Kissinger's geopolitical philosophy regarding China. It contrasts American diplomatic impatience with Chinese strategic patience (referencing Sun Tzu and Mao) and warns of potential future conflict based on cultural misunderstandings of deterrence versus preemption. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a book or a report analyzing Henry Kissinger's book 'On China'. It discusses the psychological and cultural differences between American and Chinese leadership, specifically referencing the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown, the Korean War, and the philosophies of Mao Zedong and Jiang Zemin. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a book or article (possibly a review of Henry Kissinger's 'On China') included in House Oversight files. It discusses Kissinger's analysis of Chinese geopolitical strategy, referencing historical figures like Sun Tzu, Confucius, and Mao Zedong, and compares the economic trajectories of the U.S. and China since Kissinger's 1971 visit. While contained in an investigation file (indicated by the footer), the text itself is a historical and economic analysis rather than a record of specific illicit activity.
This document appears to be page 17 of a book or article (likely by or about Henry Kissinger's 'On China') included in a House Oversight production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031850). The text details the historical context of the US-China opening, focusing on Mao Zedong's fear of Soviet encirclement and his decision to align with the United States based on historical Chinese strategies (referencing the Romance of the Three Kingdoms). While the prompt identifies this as an Epstein-related document, the visible text contains only historical geopolitical analysis without direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document outlines Saudi Arabia's foreign policy stance amidst regional instability, positioning itself as a leader of the Arab world against Iranian aggression while viewing the U.S. as an unreliable partner. It details specific Saudi strategies regarding conflicts and political transitions in Yemen, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
This document is a scanned copy of a Washington Post article titled 'Amid the Arab Spring, a U.S.-Saudi split' by Nawaf Obaid, marked as 'Article 4' with a House Oversight footer. The text analyzes the deterioration of U.S.-Saudi relations following the Arab Spring, citing Saudi Arabia's military intervention in Bahrain (against U.S. advice) and disagreements over U.S. policy in Iraq and toward Israel. The article also highlights the rising tension between Saudi Arabia and Iran, noting Iran's funding of proxy groups and criticism of Saudi actions in Bahrain.
This document appears to be page 4 of a policy paper or political analysis arguing strongly against peace negotiations between Israel and the Assad regime in Syria. The author contends that Assad is dependent on Iran and Hezbollah and that negotiating with him during the ongoing violence (likely the start of the Syrian Civil War) would be 'morally indefensible' and strategically suicidal for Israel. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a review or article discussing the documentary film 'Inside Job', directed by Charles Ferguson. The text analyzes the film's coverage of the 2008 financial crisis, criticizing the deregulation policies of the Reagan, Clinton, and Bush administrations, and notes the refusal of key financial figures like Lawrence Summers, Robert Rubin, and Timothy Geithner to be interviewed. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a larger production of documents for a congressional investigation.
This document is a news summary or report excerpt detailing the resignation of RNC deputy finance chair Elliott Broidy following a $1.6 million hush money payment facilitated by Michael Cohen. It further details investigations into Broidy's lobbying activities involving the Malaysian government (specifically regarding Jho Low and the 1MDB scandal) and Chinese interests regarding exile Guo Wengui. The text also mentions Broidy's lawsuit against Qatar for alleged email hacking.
This document is an email chain from August 2018 in which Reid Weingarten forwards a Washington Post article to Jeffrey Epstein (Jeffrey E.). The article details a DOJ investigation into GOP fundraiser Elliott Broidy regarding alleged influence peddling with the Trump administration involving China and Malaysia. The email is marked with 'High' importance.
The document is a page from a House Oversight record (031761) discussing the LaRouche movement's drastic shift in attitude toward Donald Trump during the 2016 election. It details how the organization went from mocking Trump with satirical songs to viewing him as a strategic ally against the 'British Empire' after Hillary Clinton's defeat. It also profiles Helga LaRouche as the founder of the Schiller Institute and notes her influence over her husband.
This document appears to be a page from a larger narrative or manifesto submitted to the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031754). It details conspiracy theories involving Queen Elizabeth starting WWIII, a CIA takeover of the US in 1974, and a speech by Lyndon LaRouche (alias Lyn Marcus) regarding CIA mind control programs ('psy-war games') involving brainwashing and hypnosis. While part of a dump often associated with Epstein investigations, this specific page focuses on LaRouche and CIA conspiracy theories.
This document is a philosophical essay or memorandum (stamped with a House Oversight footer) discussing the geopolitical and sociological impact of the Internet. The author argues that the rise of populism and nationalism in the West is driven by worsening individual living conditions caused by globalization and 'non-material' capitalism, rather than solely by Russian influence or lack of regulation. It proposes viewing the Internet as a 'New Nation State' to better understand its role in society.
An email dated May 20, 2017, from Aziza Alahmadi to Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) marked as high importance. The email contains an attachment titled 'Trump; Prince of Believers .docx' and links to articles about Saudi Aramco signing $50 billion in deals with U.S. companies, coinciding with President Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia. The document originates from House Oversight Committee records.
A document page, stamped with a House Oversight production number, containing a geopolitical analysis or draft op-ed. The text discusses the destabilizing influence of Iran's Revolutionary Guard and argues that the US should support a new generation of young leaders in the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia to foster stability and economic development similar to the Asian 'Tiger Economies'.
This document appears to be a page from a political commentary or op-ed authored by Bill Siegel for FamilySecurityMatters.org. The text heavily critiques a 'McDonough' (likely Denis McDonough) and the Obama administration for stating the U.S. is not at war with Islam, labeling this stance as 'Dhimmitude' and 'unconditional surrender.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
The text argues that terrorism is just one part of a larger threat that includes "Civilization Jihad" and "International Institutional Jihad," criticizing leaders like McDonough for ignoring these broader dangers. It contends that framing terrorism as a result of U.S. policy or victimhood is a distortion that prevents the West from confronting the reality of a declared religious war, instead relying on a narrative of Western guilt.
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from the law firm Covington to Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner regarding General Michael Flynn. It argues that General Flynn is exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege to decline a Congressional subpoena for documents, citing that the act of production is testimonial in nature and could be used against him in ongoing investigations, including one by a newly appointed special counsel. The document cites legal precedents including *Watkins v. United States* and *United States v. Hubbell* to support the refusal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity