United States
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-01-01 | Court ruling | Ruling in the case of United States v. Raymonda. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal case | The case of *United States v. Schneider*, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015) is cited as a Third Ci... | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Cramer, 777 F.3d 597 (2d Cir. 2015) | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Parse, 789 F.3d 83 | U.S. Court of Appeals for t... | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Reference period for calculating the 70% cap on South Korean steel exports to the US. | N/A | View |
| 2014-10-10 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Ulbricht, No. 14 Cr. 68 (KBF), 2014 WL 5090039 | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2014-06-10 | Legal case | Legal case: United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr. 58 (KBF), 2014 WL 2696569 | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2014-05-08 | Legal case | The W.D.N.Y. court ruled in United States v. Vickers. | W.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2014-05-08 | Court case | The ruling in United States v. Vickers, No. 13 Cr. 128 (RJA), 2014 WL 1838255. | W.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2014-05-08 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Vickers, No. 13 Cr. 128 (RJA) (HKS), 2014 WL 1838255 | W.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2014-01-22 | Court decision | Decision in the case United States v. Villa. | D. Conn. | View |
| 2014-01-08 | Legal ruling | The 2d Circuit Court ruled in United States v. Martoma, concluding a defendant's privacy interest... | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2014-01-08 | Court ruling | A court ruling was issued in the case of United States v. Martoma. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2014-01-01 | Legal decision | The Seventh Circuit issued a decision in the case of United States v. Causey. | Seventh Circuit | View |
| 2014-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case: United States v. Smith, 985 F. Supp. 2d 547 | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2013-12-03 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Thompson, 13 Cr. 378 (AJN), 2013 WL 6246489 | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2013-08-27 | Legal case | United States v. Young, Nos. 12 Cr. 502, 12 Cr. 645, 2013 WL 12131300 (D. Utah Aug. 27, 2013) | District of Utah | View |
| 2013-07-19 | Legal case | United States v. Cilins, No. 13 Cr. 315 (WHP), 2013 WL 3802012 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2013) | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2013-07-19 | Legal ruling | A ruling in the case United States v. Cilins was made, which is cited as precedent that France re... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2013-03-20 | N/A | Reply Of The United States Regarding Defendant David Parse | Court | View |
| 2013-03-18 | N/A | Amended Sentencing Memorandum of the United States Regarding Defendant David Parse | Court | View |
| 2013-02-26 | N/A | Scheduled resumption of diplomatic ritual/six-party talks between US and Iran. | Unspecified in text | View |
| 2013-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Santiago, 987 F. Supp. 2d 465 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2013-01-01 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Urena, 989 F. Supp. 2d 253 | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2013-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139 (2d Cir. 2013) | 2d Cir. | View |
Epstein_TECS_Records_2.pdf
This document set contains U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) TECS query results regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The first page contains a list of entry/flight records spanning from 1992 to 2002, detailing arrivals (some specifically to Palm Beach International) and flight IDs. Subsequent pages are person query reports from July and September 2019, listing Epstein's aliases, DOB (01/20/1953), an address in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, and contact information for various CBP field operations offices including JFK, Newark, and Private Aircraft Ops. Significant portions of the data are redacted.
059.pdf
This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) between the United States and Tova Noel, a Bureau of Prisons employee charged in connection with the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Noel admits to knowingly falsifying count and round slips at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9 and 10, 2019. The agreement defers prosecution for six months pending her good behavior, 100 hours of community service, and cooperation with investigators (FBI, DOJ-OIG), after which the indictment will be dismissed if conditions are met.
030.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a motion to dismiss a derivative lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase's board regarding their oversight of Jeffrey Epstein. It alleges that the Board, including CEO Jamie Dimon, ignored red flags about Epstein's sex trafficking and financial crimes (such as massive cash withdrawals) to retain him as a client, failed to implement required BSA/AML monitoring systems, and violated a Deferred Prosecution Agreement related to Madoff. The plaintiffs argue that demand on the board is excused because a majority of directors face liability or lack independence.
031.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) moving to dismiss a complaint by plaintiff Teresa Helm. The defendants argue that Helm's claims are time-barred by the statute of limitations and that she has failed to prove 'extraordinary circumstances' or a relevant criminal indictment to toll this period. Additionally, the defense argues that punitive damages are not recoverable against an estate under either New York law (where the alleged torts occurred) or USVI law (where the estate is probated).
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Teresa Helm against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, alleging sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein and his co-conspirators. The complaint details Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network, previous legal proceedings, and his personal statements regarding his actions, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
075.pdf
A legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party Jean Luc Bruhnel (spelled 'Bruhnel' in document) in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. The filing opposes a motion to compel Bruhnel's deposition, arguing that he is a French citizen who has left the U.S. with no plans to return and cannot be compelled to appear under Federal Rules. The document alleges misrepresentation and nonfeasance by the Plaintiff's counsel and suggests using the Hague Convention to secure testimony abroad.
039.pdf
This legal filing is a Motion to Compel submitted by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests the court to order Epstein to answer 23 specific requests for admission regarding his net worth, asset transfers, and allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking of minors, which he had previously refused to answer by asserting Fifth Amendment privileges. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's blanket assertion of the privilege is improper and that he must provide a particularized justification for each refusal or face an adverse inference.
040-01.pdf
Court order issued by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on April 30, 2020, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss Jane Doe 15's claim for punitive damages against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleged she was groomed by Epstein's secretary in New York and sexually abused by Epstein at his New Mexico ranch in 2004 at age 15. The court ruled that under both New York and New Mexico law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor.
039-01.pdf
This document is a legal Opinion & Order from the Southern District of New York in the case of Mary Doe v. the Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate. The court granted the executors' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's request for punitive damages. The judge ruled that New York law applies to the case because the torts occurred in New York, and under New York's Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)), punitive damages cannot be awarded against the personal representatives of an estate.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Juliette Bryant against the executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate. It details allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein, beginning when Bryant was 20 years old, and describes Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network and his previous legal actions and statements regarding his conduct.
EFTA00037910.pdf
This document is an email dated August 10, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The sender is forwarding a draft search warrant for the US Virgin Islands (USVI) for review, with the attachment filename 'USVI_SW.v6.docx'. The date coincides with the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death.
EFTA00037904.pdf
This document is a page from a victim questionnaire containing questions 13 through 23 regarding human trafficking experiences. While most answers are heavily redacted (blacked out), the document explicitly identifies the locations of the trafficking as Kentucky, Tennessee, Texas, and Florida. Crucially, question 23 identifies the trafficker as 'Jeffery Epstein' and notes he is 'in his 60's'.
EFTA00037902.pdf
An email thread from July 2019 forwarded to Ben Nivens containing a response to a 'Hope for Justice' preliminary questionnaire regarding human trafficking. The respondent claims to have been born into sex trafficking by their biological parents and specifically names Jeffery Epstein as a perpetrator who used threats of death and harm to force them into sex acts. The narrative mentions incidents occurring in a specific (redacted) year when the victim was a (redacted) age.
EFTA00037688.pdf
An internal law enforcement email dated July 2, 2020 (the day of Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest), sent from an FBI agent in New York to other FBI and NYPD personnel. The email lists 'Identifiers' for Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically her name, date of birth, social security number, US passport, and UK passport, though the specific values are redacted.
EFTA00037120.pdf
A screenshot of the CHILD USA website featuring the biography of its Founder & CEO, Prof. Marci A. Hamilton. The document outlines her academic background at the University of Pennsylvania and Cardozo School of Law, her expertise in child sex abuse statutes of limitation, and her legal advocacy including Supreme Court cases. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00037120.
EFTA00036765.pdf
This document is a promotional marketing email from the footwear company UGG sent to a Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) email address on August 15, 2019. The email advertises a new collection in collaboration with Eckhaus Latta and encourages joining the UGG Rewards program. The recipient's specific email address is redacted, leaving only the domain visible.
EFTA00035829.pdf
This Federal Bureau of Prisons report from August 2025 analyzes statistical correlations between BOP staffing levels (total employees and First Step Act positions) and inmate participation in various drug treatment programs (Drug Education, RDAP, NRDAP, Community Treatment, and MAT) from FY2021 to FY2024. The data generally shows no correlation between total BOP staffing and program participation. However, the report identifies a strong correlation (R^2 = 0.98) between the number of filled First Step Act (FSA) positions and participation in the Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) program.
EFTA00033566.pdf
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection 'Passenger Information' record generated on August 19, 2019. The document displays passport and personal information for an unidentified male subject (whose photo is visible but details are redacted), confirming he holds an issued US passport and was born in the United States. The document is marked as Law Enforcement Sensitive.
EFTA00032480.pdf
An email thread from October 2020 involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the logistical planning and approval required for two Assistant US Attorneys (AUSAs) to travel to London during the COVID-19 pandemic. The emails discuss the need for EOUSA approval, 'Fly America Act' exceptions, and difficulties obtaining official passports due to State Department restrictions.
EFTA00031972.pdf
This document is an email header dated April 1, 2020, sent between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line 'Call with USVI (Epstein)' indicates ongoing communication or coordination with United States Virgin Islands authorities regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case or estate, occurring several months after his death.
EFTA00031725.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 31, 2020, between officials at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and likely main Justice Department offices. The discussion concerns the urgent administrative approval of a 'Sweden travel memo' related to the Epstein case (Subject: 'Epstein -- travel approval form'). The chain highlights bureaucratic delays involving the Office of International Affairs (OIA) and the need to forward the approved memo to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA).
EFTA00031512.pdf
This document is an email thread from June 2020 between SDNY prosecutors and DOJ officials (including the London Attaché) negotiating the terms of a confidentiality agreement to secure an interview with 'Witness PA' (Prince Andrew). The correspondence occurs immediately following the firing of US Attorney Geoffrey Berman ('this weekend's events'), which the officials discuss as an opportunity to reset relations with the witness's legal team (Blackfords). The thread details the drafting of specific language to assure the witness that his statements will not be voluntarily disclosed for civil litigation (specifically regarding the Epstein estate in the USVI) or leaked to the press, while maintaining compliance with the US-UK Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT).
EFTA00030866.pdf
This is a subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 2, 2007. It commands a redacted individual to appear before a Grand Jury on March 13, 2007, in West Palm Beach. The recipient is ordered to bring all documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically including 'treatment notes,' 'appointment books,' and 'billing statements,' suggesting the recipient may be a medical professional or service provider.
EFTA00030660.pdf
This document is a highly sensitive internal email chain and status update from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated September 3, 2019. It details the progress of the investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators following his death, listing specific interviews conducted with victims (including Victim-2 and Victim-3) and scheduling plans for upcoming interviews with former staff, including a 'house man' and assistants. The memo discusses evidence against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding recruitment and details the involvement of a specific scheduler who denied knowing the victims' ages.
EFTA00030654.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 28, 2019 (Thanksgiving), between Mark Steward of the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and a Senior US Attorney (Ted) from the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Steward urgently inquires about an active investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding his relationship with JP Morgan's private wealth division. The US Attorney confirms an active investigation exists, notes that his unit oversees the Epstein case, and despite the US holiday, arranges an immediate conference call to include colleagues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity