| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-01-01 | Investigation | The United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted their own i... | United States | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Investigation | An investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's background and any offenses committed against the United ... | United States | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Federal investigation period into Epstein's background and offenses against the United States. | United States | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Period of investigation into offenses committed by Epstein against the United States. | United States | View |
This document is an email chain from September 13, 2020, between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York. They are coordinating the drafting of a Motion to Dismiss (MTD) related to an interlocutory appeal for 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell). The emails discuss logistics of sharing the draft and splitting the workload.
An email dated October 29, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY to Robert Glassman regarding a 'Rule 412 motion' (likely related to the admissibility of evidence concerning a victim's sexual history). The email notes the motion was filed under seal, a response is due the following Monday, and a potential closed (in camera) hearing is scheduled for November 5, 2021.
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the case US v. Maxwell. Dated March 23, 2021, it serves as a transmittal for attachments containing the Government's opposition to defense motions and proposed redactions for legal filings and exhibits.
This document consists of an email chain dated July 2, 2020, coordinating the distribution of a 'SDNY Premises Search Warrant Bundle' and a signed affidavit. The correspondence involves the FBI (New York office), the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), and the US Attorney's Office for New Hampshire (USANH). The date and agencies involved align with the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in New Hampshire.
This document contains an email chain from July and August 2019 regarding the case 'US v. Gatto'. Jonathan M. Albano of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP asks other counsel if they object to him filing a copy of the Second Circuit's decision in 'Brown v. Maxwell' (a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell unsealing) with the court. The underlying email from a redacted Assistant US Attorney provides the government's opposition to a motion by Oath Inc. to intervene in the Gatto case.
This document is an email chain from November 2019 between attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a discovery request for statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's attempted suicide on July 22-23, 2019. While the USANYS agreed to produce reports of Tartaglione's statements, they explicitly refused to produce reports and video of the attempted suicide itself, deeming them irrelevant to the current case.
This document is an email dated November 14, 2019, from a Victim Witness Coordinator at the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The subject line asks recipients if they have vouchers for Epstein victims. The sender's name and recipient list are redacted.
This document contains a series of email threads between Assistant United States Attorneys (SDNY) and administrative staff requesting travel approval for the investigation 'United States v. Epstein' (Case 2018R01618). The emails, dating from March to November 2019, detail logistics for commercial JetBlue flights and hotel stays to conduct interviews with victims and hold meetings in Los Angeles, West Palm Beach, and Fort Lauderdale. The specific names of the attorneys and victims are redacted.
An email thread from June 30, 2020, involving Deputy US Attorney Audrey Strauss (SDNY). The correspondence concerns a '3:30 Q and A prep' session and includes an attachment titled 'Maxwell_possible_QA_v2.docx', suggesting preparations for a press event or legal proceeding regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (who was arrested shortly after, on July 2, 2020).
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell and others) dated October 8, 2021. The email serves as notification for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and discusses logistical arrangements for providing digital evidence to Ms. Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated October 7, 2021. The email discusses a draft '3500 Cover Letter' (referring to Jencks Act material) and an attachment named 'Maxwell_Cover_Letter', likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The sender asks for review regarding language about a redacted individual.
Legal correspondence from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, to the US Attorney's Office regarding objections to hearsay statements. The defense objects to statements made by Epstein to employees (specifically CC-1) about Maxwell 'finding girls' and instructions regarding computer removal, arguing these occurred post-conspiracy and constitute 'idle chatter' rather than furtherance of a conspiracy. The letter also addresses the scope of 'minor victims' referenced in the indictment versus those in Florida investigations.
An email sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York on November 23, 2021. The email transmits an attachment containing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The document is heavily redacted regarding personal identifiers.
An email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The email discusses the procedure for filing redacted versions of legal documents related to birth certificates, exhibit GX-52, and a motion to quash, referencing Docket Numbers 473, 474, and 476. The sender proposes a sequence for filing cover letters and redacted motions to the Court.
A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on May 12, 2021. It commands a redacted individual to appear at 40 Foley Square on November 29, 2021, to testify in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is signed by US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
This document is an internal email dated November 20, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York to their legal team. The email concerns a 'Jury instructions letter' and includes an attachment titled '2021-11-20,_GM,_edits_to_limiting_instructions_v3.docx', likely related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). The sender asks for comments on the attached draft.
An email dated July 24, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding a 'protective order' for discovery. The email references an attachment with the filename containing 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and 'RMB' (likely Judge Richard M. Berman), indicating legal proceedings related to the Epstein case.
This document is an email dated October 7, 2020, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'Emails' and it contains four attachments that appear to be FBI native PDF files (FBI_0000018415_native.pdf, etc.). The names of the sender and recipient are redacted.
This document is an internal email chain from July 17, 2019, within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). A Deputy United States Attorney requests a copy of the 'Filed version of Epstein papers' from a colleague. The colleague replies with three PDF attachments (including a Defense Letter dated July 16, 2019) and notes that these are the publicly filed versions, offering the unredacted submission if needed.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 involving US Attorney's Office (SDNY) agents discussing tips received from Susan Harriman. Harriman provides information analyzing Epstein's Form 990 financial reports, highlighting heavy investments in TenCent and Western Digital. She attempts to link TenCent Audit Committee member Iain Ferguson Bruce to a redacted individual's wife via the Blue Chip Growth Fund board. The agents discuss directing Harriman to the FBI tip line as she refuses to call it herself.
An email dated July 1, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email transmits a document titled '2020-07-01,_GM,_detention_memo.docx', likely referring to a detention memo for Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM') prepared just prior to her arrest on July 2, 2020.
This document is an email dated June 26, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The subject is 'transcript' and it includes two PDF attachments labeled as transcripts from June 19, 2019, and July 19, 2019.
This document is a letter dated August 1, 2008, from attorney Brad Edwards to an Assistant US Attorney regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards argues for the inclusion of specific facts in a court notice, specifically that a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) barring federal charges was negotiated in secret in 2007 and withheld from victims due to a confidentiality clause until after Epstein's state plea in June 2008. Edwards also demands a full copy of the NPA, FBI interview reports of his clients, and a hearing transcript.
A legal motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 08-8068-LRJ) requesting to seal a search warrant application. The motion, submitted under U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, cites an ongoing grand jury investigation and the risk that public disclosure would jeopardize the case or notify targets. The specific Assistant U.S. Attorney's identity and contact details are redacted.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity