| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
An email dated April 1, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a 'Maxwell bail briefing' and includes four attachments related to Ghislaine Maxwell's legal proceedings, including bail motions, denial orders, and arraignment records spanning from July 2020 to April 2021.
This document is a chain of emails from March 9-10, 2020, between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) from the Southern District of New York. The AUSA is seeking to interview a woman (name redacted) regarding an investigation. Scarola indicates that his own attempts to contact the woman have been ignored and provides her phone number to the AUSA, stating he has no objection to them contacting her directly.
The United States Government filed this Memorandum of Law in opposition to defendant Michael Thomas's motion to compel additional discovery in the case regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The government argues that it has already provided substantial discovery (video surveillance, logs, witness statements) and that Thomas's requests for Inspector General reports and internal BOP disciplinary records of other employees are irrelevant, privileged, or intended for an improper 'jury nullification' defense regarding staffing shortages. The government asserts that Thomas has failed to provide evidence for a selective prosecution claim.
An email dated April 12, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding Steve Bannon's iPhone 7. The email informs the recipient that text messages between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein were found on the device but notes that they are not responsive to the specific warrant being executed.
This document is an internal email chain from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated August 6-7, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein's historical state plea transcript. An Assistant U.S. Attorney highlights specific quotes from the plea hearing where the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida was detailed, explicitly noting that federal prosecutors agreed not to prosecute Epstein federally in SDFL if he completed probation. The email also notes that SDFL representatives were present in court during the plea.
This document is an email chain from August 2019 between an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and a contractor. The correspondence concerns the logistical processing and serving of multiple subpoenas explicitly described as 'All Epstein related.' The discussion clarifies administrative details regarding the attachment of OB211 forms and the handling of fax confirmations.
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on August 17, 2019, to Bank of America. It commands the bank to produce comprehensive financial records (including opening documents, checks, wires, and statements) for a specifically redacted account from January 1, 2019, to the present. The subpoena cites investigations into alleged violations of federal laws covering bribery, conspiracy, fraud, and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. §§ 201, 371, 1001, 1346, 1519, 2).
An email dated August 14, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Mr. Foy. The email confirms a previous phone conversation establishing that Mr. Foy represents Tova Noel and is authorized to accept a subpoena on her behalf, which is attached to the email. This document likely pertains to the investigation following Jeffrey Epstein's death, involving one of the guards on duty.
This document is an email chain from August 2019 within the SDNY United States Attorney's Office regarding an OIG/FBI document preservation order following Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. An Associate U.S. Attorney instructs staff to preserve all emails, notes, and texts related to Epstein's conditions of confinement. One prosecutor responds confirming they possess pertinent emails regarding both the July 23, 2019 incident and the August 10, 2019 suicide.
An email dated February 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the drafting of an 'Opposition to Motion to Suppress'. The sender discusses incorporating edits from 'the chiefs' and coordinates a final review with their team before submitting the document back to supervisors. The document number is EFTA00027081.
An email dated January 5, 2021, from a Counsel to the Acting U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding an Epstein FOIA question. The body discusses an investigative reason for redacting SHU (Special Housing Unit) staff names in MCC (Metropolitan Correctional Center) records dating back to August 4th.
An email dated April 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney regarding the 'Epstein FOIA' case (specifically Times v. BOP, case 20cv833). The sender circulates a draft letter to Judge Engelmayer concerning 'Noel' and next steps in the litigation ahead of a scheduled 10:00 call.
This document is an email sent on April 13, 2021, between employees of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The sender, an Assistant United States Attorney whose name is redacted, is transmitting a document titled '2021.04.12 [Redacted] Memo.docx' to another redacted recipient. The specific subject matter of the memo is obscured by redactions.
This document packet contains a sealed Order and Grand Jury Subpoena from the Southern District of New York, issued in February 2020, directing the Interlochen Center for the Arts to produce student records. The investigation concerns 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) (transportation of minors) and specifically seeks records of all students enrolled between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1998. The court ordered the subpoena be kept secret for 180 days to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering.
This document is an email dated October 11, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email contains a draft of a '12.2 letter' attached as '2021.10.XX_GM_12.2_letter_to_defense.docx', likely relating to the Ghislaine Maxwell (GM) legal proceedings, specifically possibly referencing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2 regarding notice of an insanity defense or expert testimony on mental condition.
This document is an internal email dated June 16, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The sender is requesting Jeffrey Epstein's most recent SORNA (Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act) registration documents, noting that their current records date back to April 2018 and suspecting a more recent filing occurred within the prior two months.
This document is an internal email thread from September 9, 2020, between employees of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). An Associate U.S. Attorney requests that a specific (redacted) name be excluded from a 'PC Unit' regular update document to avoid conflicts of interest, stating they review updates to clear conflicts for others. The respondent attaches a file named 'PC_Unit_--_Short_Form_Update.9.4.20.docx'.
This document is an email chain from February 23, 2021, among Assistant United States Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The prosecutors are collaborating on a legal brief opposing a motion, referred to as the 'NPA brief' (Non-Prosecution Agreement). The specific attachment filename '2021-02-26_GM_Government_Opposition_(NPA)' strongly suggests this relates to the government's opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss charges based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement.
An email dated February 22, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a 'review protocol' and contains an attachment related to the review of image and video files found on Epstein's devices.
An email dated February 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email attaches a draft opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to sever perjury charges for internal review.
An email dated January 8, 2020, from a Co-Chief of the Narcotics Unit at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The email contains an attachment titled '2020.01.08_letter_to_KMK_re_MCC_tape.docx', which likely refers to a letter sent to Judge Kenneth M. Karas (KMK) regarding video footage (tape) from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), possibly related to the cell shared by Jeffrey Epstein and Nicholas Tartaglione.
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding a telephone conference for the Maxwell case presided over by Judge Nathan. The email follows up on previous communication from Bobbi Sternheim and provides dial-in information for the defendant, referencing an attached court order.
This document is an email dated June 10, 2021, sent by an unnamed Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'Joint/Separate' and it includes two attachments referencing legal motions and orders from 2020 involving a party named 'Thomas' and an order by 'Torres' (likely Judge Analisa Torres).
This document contains an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, visits to Epstein's house, and social outings with him. The prosecutors also request a follow-up interview with the witness, noting they found her previous testimony credible.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity