| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) coordinating interviews for several Epstein victims. The correspondence discusses scheduling around a 'victims' meeting' on October 23, 2019, and visa/passport issues for a specific victim who was 'brought to the US by Epstein a number of times.' The emails also mention a set of sisters, one of whom had already been interviewed by the SDNY.
This document is an email dated October 28, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorneys Brad Edwards and Brittany Henderson. The email serves to transmit a redacted version of a defense memorandum regarding a Federal Rule of Evidence 412 motion filed under seal. It discusses upcoming deadlines, including a November 1 response date and pretrial conference, and a tentative in-camera hearing on November 5.
This document is an email dated October 29, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email notifies counsel of an additional discovery production being made via USAfx and discusses logistical arrangements for providing these materials to Ms. Maxwell at the MDC, either via CD or hard drive.
This document is an email dated April 11, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in White Plains, NY, to colleagues, including one at USANYS. The sender is coordinating the retrieval of specific Bureau of Prisons (BOP) FOIA documents related to Epstein that do not have a 'translucent green watermark,' anticipating that the Court will require the production of clean copies.
This document is an email dated August 17, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Andrew (likely Andrew Rohrbach) to redacted colleagues. It discusses a recent ruling by Judge Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motions. The email focuses on correcting the Judge's presumption that the prosecution intended to provide the defense with the identities of uncharged co-conspirators, stating clearly that they 'do not, in fact, intend to do so' and have drafted a letter to that effect.
This document is a Declaration of Custodian of Records from Delta Air Lines executed on April 8, 2020, in response to a 2010 Grand Jury Subpoena. It includes detailed flight records for a passenger (name redacted) living in Crawfordville, FL, who purchased a ticket on January 18, 2020, for travel between Los Angeles (LAX) and Las Vegas (LAS) in April 2020. The records confirm a payment of $307.80 via Visa.
An email from an Associate U.S. Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated March 10, 2020. The sender requests a colleague to compile Epstein-related press releases, charges, and other public documents, referencing a meeting held a couple of weeks prior. The subject line references 'Epstein FOIAs'.
This document is an internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York, dated September 16, 2020. The email asks a colleague to review a final draft of an attached document titled '2020-09-16_GM_ex-parte_discovery_letter.v4.docx', which likely pertains to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell (GM).
An email chain from September 14, 2020, involving an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence acknowledges receipt of a document related to case number 2020PR000426AMB concerning Jeffrey E. Epstein.
This document is an email dated October 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves as a transmittal notice for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The prosecutor notes that digital files are being sent via USAfx and a physical CD is being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell.
An email chain from November 2021 involving Assistant United States Attorneys from the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns the filing of a 'Second Daubert Motion' intended to preclude the testimony of a 'Dr. Hall' (likely an expert witness). The emails discuss the drafting of the motion and a deadline for the following day.
This document is an email dated August 5, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney to a redacted recipient. The email contains an attachment titled '2020.08.05_Maxwell_Discovery_Letter.docx', indicating it relates to legal discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The body text is brief, simply stating 'Here's the letter.'
This document is an email chain between USANYS prosecutors dating from December 3 to December 6, 2019. The discussion concerns a request from Nicholas Tartaglione's defense team for evidence corroborating Tartaglione's claim that he saved Jeffrey Epstein's life during a suicide attempt on July 23 in the MCC SHU. The prosecutors discuss reviewing inmate and MCC employee notes to determine if they constitute 'penalty-phase Brady' material that must be disclosed.
This document is an email dated October 24, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a legal team. The email subjects concerns 'Drafts of the remaining motions' and includes two attachments titled 'Forbidden_Words_v1.docx' and 'Suppress_ID_v2.docx', suggesting ongoing legal preparation, likely for a trial (potentially the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the timeframe and context of SDNY involvement).
This document is an email chain from March 2020 between high-profile attorney Gloria Allred and an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The SDNY 'Epstein team' requested a call to provide updates and discuss Allred's clients. The correspondence arranges a conference call, which took place on March 26, 2020, where they discussed specific individuals (whose names are redacted) and Allred agreed to contact a specific woman despite not currently representing her in litigation.
This document is an email sent on February 3, 2021, by an unnamed Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The subject deals with 'Maxwell motions' (part 2 of 3) and includes a zip file attachment related to a filing from January 25, 2021.
This document is an email chain dated November 3-4, 2021, originating from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence discusses and attaches a draft 'verdict sheet' for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial ('2021.11.03_Maxwell_verdict_sheet.docx').
An email correspondence dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to an unknown recipient. The email contains an attachment titled '2021.11.03_Maxwell_RTC_[unredacted].docx', likely pertaining to legal filings or proceedings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
A subpoena issued by the US District Court (SDNY) on September 30, 2021, commanding AIC Title Service, Inc. to produce all records relating to aircraft N750A and N722JE from January 1, 2008, to the present. The subpoena is issued in connection with the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) dated October 9, 2021, regarding the upcoming trial (likely Ghislaine Maxwell, indicated by 'GM' in subject). The email discusses a female individual interviewed that day, referencing a 'tipline call' and a 'PBPD report' (Palm Beach Police Department). Attachments include notes from the interview and excerpts from the police report.
An email dated August 14, 2019 (shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death), sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email discusses a draft presentation regarding 'Brass materials' (likely a case name or code) and asks a colleague to contribute before sending it to supervisors ('the chiefs').
An internal email chain from July 17, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The Deputy United States Attorney requests a copy of 'Epstein papers,' and a colleague provides the 'publicly filed versions' submitted the previous day, offering access to unredacted versions if necessary.
An email dated May 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in White Plains, NY, to colleagues Jason and Maurene. The sender questions the classification of an attached document related to Epstein records (referencing New York Times litigation) which had been withheld under a 'Tartaglione' classification, suggesting it should be released.
This document is an email chain from late September 2021 involving an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The discussion concerns a 'photo sourcing project' for trial preparation, resulting in the attachment of a spreadsheet titled 'Photos_for_Trial_Prep_with_Location_Info.xlsx' containing evidence item numbers and CD locations. The timing suggests this is related to preparations for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
This document is an email chain from July and August 2019 involving attorney Jonathan M. Albano (representing Oath Inc.) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns 'US v. Gatto' and a motion by Oath Inc. to intervene to obtain materials. Albano specifically requests to file the Second Circuit's July 3, 2019 decision in 'Brown v. Maxwell' (a case involving unsealing documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein) as supplemental authority, linking the legal standards of public access between the two cases.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity