Federal Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-08-21 | Legal proceeding | The court ordered the government to provide petitioners with a copy of the NPA subject to a prote... | Federal Court | View |
| 2008-07-01 | N/A | A victim filed an emergency petition for enforcement of rights under the CVRA. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal event | The Federal Court orders the USAO to disclose the NPA to victims, and the USAO sends a revised vi... | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017967.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article dated April 3, 2019, included as a legal exhibit and part of a House Oversight production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017967). It details the legal battle between Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards, represented by Jack Scarola, regarding allegations of malfeasance. The article also provides background on Virginia Roberts, detailing her troubled youth and victimization by sex trafficker Ron Eppinger in Miami prior to her involvement with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017869.jpg
This is page 804 of a legal opinion from the Federal Supplement (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, though the case name is not explicitly at the top). It details the court's decision to grant the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's motion to dismiss a complaint based on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The text also discusses standards for Personal Jurisdiction and the New York Long-Arm Statute, citing various legal precedents. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017836.jpg
This document is a page from a legal reporter (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the litigation 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It lists legal headnotes (35-43) defining the standards for establishing personal jurisdiction over foreign defendants in conspiracy cases under New York law. While part of a House Oversight production (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017836), the specific text discusses allegations against Saudi Arabian Princes regarding the 9/11 attacks and does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, though such legal precedents regarding conspiracy and jurisdiction are often cited in complex international litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017817.jpg
This document is the final page of a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit in April 2019. It features quotes from retired FBI agent Kenneth Lanning regarding child abuse trauma and statements from a victim advocate named Wild criticizing the government's protection of Epstein. It also references Ghislaine Maxwell's role as an associate and her participation in a TED Talk.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017804.jpg
This document is a court filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) containing a printout of a Miami Herald article dated April 3, 2019. The article discusses a legal battle between Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards, who represents Epstein's victims, and details the background of victim Virginia Roberts, including her prior trafficking by Ron Eppinger. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017724.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), detailing specific rights afforded to victims, such as the right to be heard and the right to restitution, and argues that the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure must be amended to reflect these statutory rights. The text cites Senators Kyl and Feinstein and references the Oklahoma City bombing case as a catalyst for the legislation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017669.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 34 of 78 in the production) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 17 subpoenas. The text argues that victim privacy and dignity interests should subordinate defense strategy interests, criticizing the Advisory Committee's notes on ex parte procedures. The document bears the name David Schoen (a known attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017507.jpg
This document is a four-page condensed transcript (pages 66-69) of a deposition of Scott Rothstein. He is questioned by Ms. Haddad regarding the electronic filing of federal court cases via PACER in 2009, specifically concerning a complaint filed by attorney Brad Edwards around July 24th. Rothstein admits that while he lacks specific recollection of the filing or a July 23rd meeting, the case may have been utilized to further his Ponzi scheme. The document ends with a question regarding whether Cara Holmes was an FBI or IRS agent.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017290.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the reference to his book 'The Best Defense') submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details two specific legal cases involving attempted murder: one involving the 'factual impossibility' of killing a corpse, and another utilizing a biblical analogy (the 'Abraham Defense') regarding a man who threatened his sister's abuser but was stopped by police. Both cases highlight complex legal defenses regarding intent and impossibility, resulting in the clients going free.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010505.jpg
This document is a page from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich') contained within House Oversight files. It details the background of State Attorney Barry Krischer, specifically focusing on sexual harassment allegations filed against him in 1992 by his former secretary, Jodi Bergeron, which were dismissed. The text juxtaposes Krischer's legal troubles with Chief Reiter's investigations into both Rush Limbaugh and Jeffrey Epstein, mentioning potential felony charges and a case titled 'B.B. vs. Epstein'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028968.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, among Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg) regarding a media inquiry from Reuters. David Ingram of Reuters contacted Martin Weinberg seeking comment on a newly filed federal lawsuit in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The legal team's internal discussions regarding the response are redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023012.jpg
This document provides a chronological summary of legal proceedings associated with the Epstein case during a specific year, detailing allegations made by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and Ghislaine Maxwell. It covers court filings in January, a federal judge's ruling in April regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and a defamation lawsuit filed by Roberts against Maxwell in September.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023008.jpg
This document is a timeline, likely from a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, detailing the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein between May 2008 and July 2009. It covers his guilty plea to state solicitation charges, his 18-month sentencing, the subsequent work release program where he spent 12 hours a day at his office, and his early release in 2009. The text also highlights the Miami Herald's investigative work ('Perversion of Justice') in exposing the deal and the lack of notification provided to victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015624.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal response by Edwards and Cassell in a case against Alan Dershowitz, arguing that sexual abuse allegations are inherent to the lawsuit and not peripheral. The text references legal precedents regarding confidentiality and cites Dershowitz's own counterclaim, which quotes specific allegations that Epstein forced a minor (Jane Doe #3) to have sexual relations with Dershowitz in various locations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013463.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards regarding the civil case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. It details Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), his repeated invocation of the 5th Amendment during depositions to avoid self-incrimination regarding sex crimes against minors, and the depositions of his co-conspirators who were employed to procure underage girls. The document highlights that Jane Doe refused to limit her damages to $150,000 as stipulated in the NPA and asserts that Epstein's co-conspirators helped protect him from law enforcement detection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308.jpg
This legal document is page 5 of Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It details that Epstein settled three cases on July 6, 2010, following court-ordered mediation, with confidential terms. The text argues against Epstein's claims that he was a victim of a scheme involving Edwards and Rothstein (RRA), noting Edwards had severed ties with Rothstein prior to the settlements, and highlights a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts as significant evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters correspondent David Ingram seeking comment from Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who subsequently forwarded it to Darren Indyke. The email includes an attachment titled 'katie johnson v trump complaint.pdf', and a significant portion of the correspondence between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram contacting attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California federal court. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwards it to his legal team (Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger). Portions of the attorney communications are redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029833.jpg
This document is a printed email chain from April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows this inquiry being forwarded rapidly from Weinberg to Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com), and then from Epstein to his legal team (Dershowitz, Black, Goldberger), with subsequent legal discussions redacted for privilege.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029831.jpg
This document is an email chain dated April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows the inquiry being forwarded from Weinberg to Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com), and subsequently discussed by attorneys Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Roy Black, though the specific legal advice is redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029399.jpg
This document is a page from a Law.com article by Jenna Greene dated October 11, 2016, analyzing a lawsuit filed by 'Katie Johnson' (Jane Doe) against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein alleging rape in 1994 when the plaintiff was 13. The article discusses the addition of a new lawyer named Mason to the plaintiff's team, details graphic allegations of assault at Epstein's NYC townhouse, and notes Trump's lawyer Alan Garten's denial. The author expresses skepticism about the initial pro se filing's professional formatting despite the plaintiff's claimed lack of legal experience.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v. Trump) alleging rape by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwarded it to his legal defense team, including Alan Dershowitz and Roy Black. The document includes a 'Privileged - Redacted' stamp, indicating sensitive attorney-client communication was removed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029232.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 19, 2015, featuring a media inquiry from Washington Post reporter John Sullivan to Alan Dershowitz. Sullivan requests a discussion regarding a declaration Dershowitz filed in federal court, in which Dershowitz stated he had reason to believe allegations that Bill Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein's Caribbean island were untrue. Dershowitz subsequently forwarded this inquiry to an unknown recipient.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029229.jpg
This document contains an email thread from March 19, 2015, initiated by Washington Post reporter John Sullivan to Alan Dershowitz. Sullivan is requesting a discussion regarding allegations that former President Bill Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein's Caribbean island, noting that Dershowitz had previously filed a court declaration stating he believed these allegations to be untrue. Dershowitz forwarded this inquiry to an unknown recipient approximately one hour later.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021967.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (Chapter 26, pages 108-109) detailing Jeffrey Epstein's financial dealings in the 1980s. It describes his tax avoidance pitches and a specific 1982 oil-drilling investment scam involving Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics. Stroll invested $450,000 but only received $10,000 back (which Epstein claimed in court was payment for a horse); the resulting lawsuit was settled out of court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity