Federal Court

Organization
Mentions
186
Relationships
0
Events
3
Documents
87
Also known as:
Federal courts Federal Court in New York Federal Courts Federal Court in California Los Angeles federal court U.S. Federal Court Federal Court / Southern District of Florida Federal Court South Florida Federal Court (Southern District of New York implied by Judge Nathan)

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2008-08-21 Legal proceeding The court ordered the government to provide petitioners with a copy of the NPA subject to a prote... Federal Court View
2008-07-01 N/A A victim filed an emergency petition for enforcement of rights under the CVRA. Southern District of Florida View
2008-01-01 Legal event The Federal Court orders the USAO to disclose the NPA to victims, and the USAO sends a revised vi... N/A View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021833.jpg

Page 10 of a deposition transcript marked 'ROUGH DRAFT ONLY' bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves an interviewer questioning a witness about the ethical responsibilities of an attorney when signing pleadings filed in Federal Court, specifically the Southern District of Florida. The witness defines the obligation as ensuring a good-faith pleading based on facts and law while zealously representing the client.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021745.jpg

This document details a sentencing hearing for a defendant named McDaniel. The defense (Hunt) argued for leniency, while the prosecutor (Villafaña) requested 5-6 years. The victim's mother provided a statement highlighting the trauma inflicted and revealing that McDaniel had violated a no-contact order and previously discussed sexual acts with another minor. Judge Zloch interrupted the proceedings to inquire specifically about the mention of another incident involving a minor girl.

Legal narrative / court proceeding summary (house oversight record)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021665.jpg

An FBI FD-350 form containing a Palm Beach Post article dated January 26, 2010. The article details the obstruction charges against Alfredo Rodriguez, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein, who attempted to sell a 'black book' containing victims' names to an undercover agent for $50,000. The FBI affidavit by Special Agent Christina Pryor notes that this withheld evidence contained hundreds of victims and could have significantly altered the original federal case against Epstein.

Fbi form fd-350 (newspaper clipping)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021523.jpg

This document is an FBI filing (Form FD-350) containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated February 1, 2008. The article details a second civil lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein in two weeks, seeking over $50 million for sexual acts committed against a minor (Jane Doe No. 2) in 2004 or 2005 at his Palm Beach mansion. The article outlines the recruitment method involving another girl, the specific allegations of sexual contact during a massage, and a $200 payment.

Fbi form fd-350 (newspaper clipping)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032396.jpg

An email chain from December 2016 between Ken Starr and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). Starr expresses warm affection ('Love ya', 'A prince art thou') and informs Epstein he has taken a high-profile appeal case against Johnson & Johnson. Earlier in the chain, Epstein asks Starr a legal question regarding Donald Trump, JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act), and constitutional challenges.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032396.jpg

An email chain from December 2016 between Ken Starr and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). Starr expresses warm affection ('Love ya', 'A prince art thou') and informs Epstein he has taken a high-profile appeal case against Johnson & Johnson. Earlier in the chain, Epstein asks Starr a legal question regarding Donald Trump, JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act), and constitutional challenges.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016451.jpg

This document, likely from a House Oversight investigation, details the 2011 fallout where victim Roberts publicly accused Epstein, Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew of sexual abuse. It describes Alexander Acosta's defense of his decision not to prosecute Epstein federally, citing a 'year-long assault' by Epstein's legal team. However, the report notes that documents show prosecutors capitulated to the defense team's demands, abandoning a prepared 53-page indictment from 2007.

Investigative report / congressional record
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016438.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a Miami Herald article (part of the 'Perversion of Justice' series) included in a House Oversight file. It details the investigative process into Jeffrey Epstein, mentioning how investigator Recarey was overwhelmed by the number of victims and describing aggressive tactics used by Epstein's private investigators, including intimidation, trash picking, and posing as police officers. It also highlights the involvement of Alan Dershowitz and Sarah Kellen, noting Kellen's role in allegedly warning victims against speaking to law enforcement.

News article printout / investigative report
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022375.jpg

This document is a one-page political analysis report from EY, dated 'Election 2016,' discussing the results and implications of the 2016 U.S. election. It analyzes the Republican majorities in the House and Senate, potential legislative challenges like the Senate's 60-vote cloture rule, and the change in the number of GOP House seats. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related activities.

Political analysis report
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012403.jpg

This document is a fragment of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects and instructs the witness not to answer questions if their knowledge comes from their private conversations, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness denies having knowledge of the lawsuit from any other source.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-17

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012402.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit recently filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects, citing attorney-client privilege and instructing his client not to answer if their knowledge comes only from their protected conversations. The exchange becomes tense, with Mr. Leopold mistakenly calling the questioning attorney 'Lewis'.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-17

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012401.jpg

This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unnamed witness, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, is questioned about their connection to an apartment and their knowledge of a criminal case. The questioning reveals that Mr. Leopold recently filed a $50 million lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein in federal court, prompting an objection from the lawyer.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-17
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity