Osama bin Laden
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ali
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mohamed
|
No direct link established |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
two other unnamed defendants
|
Alleged co conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Turki
|
Antagonistic official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Kingdom (Saudi Arabia)
|
Willful ignorance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Erik Prince
|
Thematic comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CIA
|
Alleged asset liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Suleiman al Rajhi
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Turki
|
Alleged facilitator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Abdel Abdul Jalil Batterjee
|
Alleged supporter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Enaam M. Arnaout
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NAL
|
Supporter affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Al Rajhi family
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Al Shamal Bank
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wa’el Julaidan
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ayman al-Zawahri
|
Professional hierarchical |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ICA
|
Alleged financier beneficiary |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bakr bin Laden
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Tariq bin Laden
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Batterjee
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Kamel
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sultan
|
Meeting alleged funding support |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mohammed Jamal Khalife
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ayman al-Zawahiri
|
Friend |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Funding of Osama bin Laden | Sudan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged provision of material support to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda. | Sudan (implied context) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden following Iraq's invasion of Kuw... | Unknown (likely Saudi Arabia) | View |
| 2011-05-02 | N/A | Raid on Osama bin Laden's compound where he was killed and evidence (SSE) was collected. | Bin Laden's compound | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | bin Laden raid | Pakistan | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | Killing of Osama bin Laden (referenced event) | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | Killing of Osama bin Laden | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | Operation to kill Osama bin Laden using Navy SEALs. | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | Death of Osama bin Laden | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | The killing of Osama bin Laden | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2007-09-01 | N/A | Eve of the sixth anniversary of 9/11. | N/A | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | The 9/11 terrorist attacks (referred to as 'when the Twin Towers fell 10 years ago'). | New York, The Pentagon | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Terrorist Attacks | United States | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | African embassy bombings | Africa | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | Bombing of United States embassies. | Nairobi and Dar es Salaam | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | al-Qaeda's abrupt departure from Sudan to Afghanistan. | Sudan to Afghanistan | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | Osama bin Laden declared war on Americans | Global | View |
| 1995-01-01 | N/A | Osama bin Laden identified Human Concern International Society as a supporter. | Unknown | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Stripping of Osama bin Laden's citizenship | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Osama bin Laden began singling out the US for attack | N/A | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Establishment of Al Shamal Bank | Sudan (implied) | View |
| 1988-01-01 | N/A | Founding of al-Qaeda by Bin Laden and Azzam. | Afghanistan | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Facilitation of jihad operations | Sudan | View |
| 1980-01-01 | N/A | Osama bin Laden traveled to Afghanistan to participate in the jihad. | Afghanistan | View |
| 1971-01-01 | N/A | Family picture taken featuring Young Osama bin Laden. | Sweden | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017887.jpg
This document is page 822 from a Federal Supplement court opinion (House Oversight record) regarding 9/11-related lawsuits (Ashton and Burnett complaints). The court dismissed complaints against individuals Tariq, Omar, and Bakr Binladin for lack of jurisdiction but denied the motion to dismiss for the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), citing the need for discovery regarding SBG's potential ties to al-Qaeda and operations in Maryland. The document also outlines allegations against the 'SAAR Network,' described as a web of charities allegedly established to fund terrorist organizations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017885.jpg
This document is page 820 from a Federal Supplement court opinion regarding the 'Burnett action,' a lawsuit related to the September 11 attacks. The text analyzes personal jurisdiction over Saudi defendants, specifically the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and Abdulrahman bin Mahfouz, detailing their alleged business ties to the U.S. and connections to entities accused of financing terrorism, such as the Blessed Relief Society (Muwaffaq). The court denies NCB's motion to dismiss but notes the complaint lacks specific actions by Mahfouz directed at the U.S. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017881.jpg
This document is a page from a Federal Supplement court opinion (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) discussing motions to dismiss by Saudi defendants. The court grants the motion to dismiss for Prince Mohamed, ruling that his role as an officer of DMI, IICG, and FIBS does not establish personal jurisdiction in the U.S. and that there is no evidence linking him to al Qaeda financing. It also introduces the Estate of Mohammad Abdullah Aljomaih as a defendant added in May 2003. While the prompt mentions Epstein, this specific page pertains to 9/11 litigation and contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017880.jpg
This document is page 815 of a court opinion (In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) from the S.D.N.Y. dated 2005. It details allegations that Prince Mohamed, as CEO of DMI (Dar al-Maal al-Islami Trust), provided financial support and banking services to al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through institutions like Faisal Islamic Bank and Al Shamal Islamic Bank. The text discusses jurisdiction arguments and lists specific terrorist events (1993 WTC bombing, 1998 embassy bombings, 9/11) as part of a common scheme. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion discussing allegations against Prince Mohamed regarding the financing of terrorism through financial institutions like Al Shamal Islamic Bank and various charities. The text details claims by plaintiffs that Prince Mohamed provided material support to al Qaeda and questions whether the court has personal jurisdiction over him based on his contacts with the United States.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017878.jpg
This document is page 813 of a court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text details the court's decision to grant motions to dismiss claims against Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki due to a lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient factual evidence linking their charitable donations to the purposeful support of al Qaeda or terrorism in the United States. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017872.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. The text focuses on legal arguments for establishing personal jurisdiction over foreign defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2), arguing that by assisting Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, the defendants purposefully directed their activities at the United States. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
This document is page 803 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York (2005) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details the Federal Plaintiffs' allegations that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia aided terrorists through various charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and the Kingdom's defense based on sovereign immunity and findings from the 9/11 Commission Report stating no evidence was found of Saudi institutional funding. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court opinion discussing motions to dismiss in a case involving allegations of material support for terrorism. It analyzes legal precedents such as *Halberstam* and *Boim* to determine if Prince Turki and Prince Sultan can be held liable for supporting charities allegedly linked to al Qaeda, noting distinctions regarding when organizations were officially designated as terrorists. The court examines whether plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient facts to show the defendants knew the charities were fronts for illegal activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017862.jpg
This document is page 797 of a legal opinion titled 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (349 F.Supp.2d 765). It details legal arguments regarding subject matter jurisdiction and the 'torts exception' to sovereign immunity, specifically addressing allegations against Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki for allegedly funding al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through Islamic charities. While the user prompt mentions Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page; the document is focused entirely on 9/11 litigation and liability under New York law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017860.jpg
This document is page 795 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal arguments surrounding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and whether the court has jurisdiction over Saudi Arabia ('The Kingdom'), Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki. The text details allegations that these defendants provided material support to charities that funded al Qaeda and willfully ignored the threat of Osama bin Laden. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017852.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) detailing allegations against the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and its leadership, specifically Khalid bin Mahfouz. It discusses claims that NCB and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) facilitated financial support for al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through charities and direct funding. The text references various legal complaints (Ashton, Burnett) and begins a discussion on the defendants' status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017851.jpg
This document is page 786 from a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely *In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details allegations by plaintiffs that Prince Turki (Head of Saudi Intelligence) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided financial and logistical support to al Qaeda and the Taliban, including facilitating money transfers and supporting charities linked to terrorism. The text also outlines Prince Turki's defense, where he denies these claims, citing his official role in attempting to extradite Osama bin Laden and Saudi Arabia's severance of ties with the Taliban in 1998. NOTE: While the prompt mentions Epstein, this specific page deals exclusively with 9/11 litigation and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017849.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal reporter (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) detailing civil litigation related to the 9/11 attacks (specifically the 'Burnett' and 'Ashton' complaints). It outlines allegations against Saudi Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, claiming he funded Islamic charities (IIRO, Al Haramain, MWL, WAMY) that served as fronts for Al Qaeda. The text details a 1990 meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden, and notes $6 million in personal contributions from Sultan to these organizations since 1994.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017845.jpg
This document is a page from a Federal Supplement (legal opinion) regarding civil litigation stemming from the September 11 attacks. It discusses motions to dismiss filed by Saudi defendants, specifically Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, as well as the National Commercial Bank, in cases alleging they provided material support to al Qaeda. The text details procedural history involving the transfer of cases between the District of Columbia and the Southern District of New York, and mentions a $4.5 billion claim by insurance companies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017830.jpg
This document is page 765 of a Federal District Court opinion (S.D.N.Y.) dated January 18, 2005, regarding litigation stemming from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001). The text discusses jurisdictional issues concerning a defendant named 'Privatbank' and dismisses claims against individual defendants Horath and Buchmann. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, often associated with investigations into financial institutions (like Deutsche Bank) that may overlap with Epstein investigations, this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017601.jpg
This document appears to be a compilation of notes and correspondence submitted to the House Oversight Committee (stamped 017601). It contains conspiratorial text linking Erik Prince, 9/11 events, and Benghazi to a 'New World Order,' alongside criticism of Obama's Gitmo policy. It includes a transcript of a Facebook message to Dick Cheney about interrogation techniques and a specific email to 'Deputy Lyddy' describing a female subject as exhausted, sleep-deprived, and hungry, followed by commentary on 'reversed-engineered SERE' and the APA's role in torture justification.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017600.jpg
This document, marked as a House Oversight record, draws parallels between private military contractor Erik Prince (Blackwater) and Osama Bin Laden as intelligence assets. It details the controversial legal defense of Jeffrey Epstein by Ken Starr and others, specifically highlighting the sweeping immunity granted by the Southern District of Florida non-prosecution agreement. The text explicitly suggests Epstein's light sentence is best explained by the use of children for 'government-sponsored sexual blackmail.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017441.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript or memoir, likely by Alan Dershowitz (evidenced by references to his books *The Case For Peace* and *The Case For Israel*). The text details the author's experience with anti-Israel protests, specifically an incident at Faneuil Hall where police escorted him away for safety, and compares current anti-Israel sentiment to historical hatreds like Nazism and Apartheid. It concludes by quoting an article by Kassim Hafeez about overcoming antisemitic upbringing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018094.jpg
This document is a page from a New Yorker article titled 'Zawahiri at the Helm' by Lawrence Wright, dated June 16, 2011. It details Ayman al-Zawahiri's ascension to the leadership of Al Qaeda following Osama bin Laden's death, discussing his history of imprisonment in Egypt, his introduction of suicide bombing tactics, and his role as bin Laden's personal physician. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018094' footer, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018087.jpg
This document appears to be page 3 of a House Oversight file containing a geopolitical analysis of the Arab Spring (circa mid-2011). The text analyzes the political instability in Bahrain, Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, and Syria, discussing the roles of Western powers (US, France, NATO) and regional dynamics involving Israel, Turkey, and Iran. It specifically mentions the death of Osama bin Laden and quotes academic Ahmed Driss and commentator Rami Khouri regarding the future of democracy in the region.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023507.jpg
This document is a New York Times article authored by Juan C. Zarate, dated April 17, 2011, discussing Al Qaeda's strategic response to the Arab Spring. It details how figures like Ayman al-Zawahri and Anwar al-Awlaki attempted to align the terrorist group with the uprisings in Libya and Egypt to regain relevance. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023414.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes (97-116) from a legal filing related to 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text discusses legal claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) against Saudi financial institutions, specifically Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank (SAMBA), and NCB, regarding allegations of material support provided to Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. It references various international treaties regarding aviation safety and terrorist bombings, and discusses the 'mental state' required for banking services to constitute material support of terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023399.jpg
This document is page 39 of a legal brief or court opinion (Westlaw) regarding 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It discusses the legal liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and Alien Tort Statute (ATS) for defendants who provided financial and material support to al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, specifically noting funding provided in Sudan in the early 1990s. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023399', suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation, likely related to financial institutions involved in terrorist financing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023398.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 Westlaw legal opinion regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001). It details legal arguments concerning the liability of entities including DMI Trust, Dallah al Baraka, and individual Saleh Abdullah Kamel for providing material support to al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden in the 1990s. The text discusses pleading standards under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and criticizes a lower court for applying an incorrect standard regarding the causal connection between 1990s support and the 2001 attacks. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Osama bin Laden | Al Shamal Bank | $50,000,000.00 | Capital contribution to the bank around the tim... | View |
| 1991-01-01 | Paid | Osama bin Laden | Al Shamal Bank | $50,000,000.00 | Capital provided to establish the bank | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Received | Saudi Binladin Group | Osama bin Laden | $1,000,000.00 | Annual disbursements. | View |
Bitterness toward Saudi Royals
Fatwa expressing extreme bitterness toward Saudi Royal family.
Use of MWL offices
Reached agreement that al-Qaeda would use MWL offices to launch attacks.
Satellite Phone Battery
Delivery of a battery for a satellite phone used by Osama bin Laden to coordinate bombings.
Support for Saudi military forces
Bin Laden purportedly offered his family's support to Saudi military forces after Iraq invaded Kuwait.
Attack planning
Communications regarding who might carry out strikes, proposing and rejecting names.
Reject capitalism/Embrace Islam
Warning to reject capitalist way of life and embrace Islam to end the Iraq war.
Weapons
Note regarding al Qaeda's need for weapons, found during Bosnian raid of BIF offices.
Ties to Julaidan
Acknowledged close ties to Wa’el Julaidan.
Killing Americans
The ruling to kill Americans and their allies is an individual duty for every Muslim.
Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the La...
Asserted the American enemy is the main cause of the situation and efforts should be concentrated on destroying them.
Against the United States
Diatribes delivered before leaving Saudi Arabia.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity