Prince Turki
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sultan
|
Co defendants |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
DGI
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ICA
|
Diplomatic political |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Osama bin Laden
|
Antagonistic official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
King Fahd
|
Subordinate official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Osama bin Laden
|
Alleged facilitator |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
al Qaeda
|
Alleged support |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DGI
|
Professional official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Saudi charities
|
Donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Zouaydi
|
Alleged denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
Government official |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden following Iraq's invasion of Kuw... | Unknown (likely Saudi Arabia) | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Legal Opinion Issued | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Publication/Filing of this court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765). | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2004-09-14 | N/A | Court heard oral argument on motions to dismiss. | Court | View |
| 2003-09-10 | N/A | Filing of the complaint by Federal Plaintiffs. | United States Court | View |
| 2002-09-04 | N/A | Lawsuit filed | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1998-06-01 | N/A | King Fahd sent Prince Turki to Kandahar to meet with the Taliban to request bin Laden's extradition. | Kandahar | View |
| 1997-01-01 | N/A | Prince Turki began serving on a joint information-sharing committee with the United States. | Unspecified | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031879.jpg
This page contains an analysis of an opinion column written by Prince Turki (likely in the Washington Post). The author of the document notes the ominous tone of Turki's writing, describing him as a skilled diplomat but lacking charm. The text warns that Saudi moderation regarding Israel may be ending due to pressure from the 'Arab street,' culminating in a threatening quote about Israel facing its 'comeuppance.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017916.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion (*In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) status of Saudi defendants. It details the court's denial of a motion to supplement the record against Prince Salman and Prince Naif regarding a 1998 article linking Saudi charities to al Qaida, citing lack of authentication. It also establishes the 'Saudi High Commission' (SHC) as an organ of the Saudi government, noting Prince Salman's role as its President. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017902.jpg
This document is page 837 of a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The page details the court's rulings on motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi defendants, including the SAAR Network, Adel A.J. Batterjee, the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), and members of the Saudi royal family (Prince Sultan, Prince Turki). While some motions were granted for lack of jurisdiction, others (such as those for SAAR Network and Batterjee) were denied, allowing claims to proceed. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was likely part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion discussing allegations against Prince Mohamed regarding the financing of terrorism through financial institutions like Al Shamal Islamic Bank and various charities. The text details claims by plaintiffs that Prince Mohamed provided material support to al Qaeda and questions whether the court has personal jurisdiction over him based on his contacts with the United States.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017878.jpg
This document is page 813 of a court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text details the court's decision to grant motions to dismiss claims against Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki due to a lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient factual evidence linking their charitable donations to the purposeful support of al Qaeda or terrorism in the United States. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
This document is page 803 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York (2005) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details the Federal Plaintiffs' allegations that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia aided terrorists through various charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and the Kingdom's defense based on sovereign immunity and findings from the 9/11 Commission Report stating no evidence was found of Saudi institutional funding. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017866.jpg
This document is page 801 from a 2005 legal opinion regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation (349 F.Supp.2d 765). The text discusses the 'discretionary function' exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and the court's finding that this exception bars claims against Saudi Royals Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, who were accused of donating to charities linked to al Qaeda. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was likely part of a Congressional document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court opinion discussing motions to dismiss in a case involving allegations of material support for terrorism. It analyzes legal precedents such as *Halberstam* and *Boim* to determine if Prince Turki and Prince Sultan can be held liable for supporting charities allegedly linked to al Qaeda, noting distinctions regarding when organizations were officially designated as terrorists. The court examines whether plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient facts to show the defendants knew the charities were fronts for illegal activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017863.jpg
This is a page from a Federal Supplement court opinion (page 798) analyzing legal standards for 'aiding and abetting' and 'civil conspiracy.' It cites key precedents including 'Halberstam v. Welch' (burglary/murder liability) and 'Boim v. Quranic Literacy Inst.' (terrorism financing). The text discusses how a defendant can be liable for the acts of another if they provide substantial assistance or are generally aware of their role in the illegal activity. While the document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT,' suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation (possibly related to Epstein banking/finance inquiries where these specific legal standards are often applied to banks), the text itself focuses on 9/11 litigation ('Burnett II') and Prince Sultan/Turki's defenses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017862.jpg
This document is page 797 of a legal opinion titled 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (349 F.Supp.2d 765). It details legal arguments regarding subject matter jurisdiction and the 'torts exception' to sovereign immunity, specifically addressing allegations against Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki for allegedly funding al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through Islamic charities. While the user prompt mentions Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page; the document is focused entirely on 9/11 litigation and liability under New York law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017860.jpg
This document is page 795 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal arguments surrounding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and whether the court has jurisdiction over Saudi Arabia ('The Kingdom'), Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki. The text details allegations that these defendants provided material support to charities that funded al Qaeda and willfully ignored the threat of Osama bin Laden. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017858.jpg
This document is page 793 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and rules that alleged money laundering or charitable contributions by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki do not constitute 'commercial activity' that would strip them of sovereign immunity. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017854.jpg
This page is from a 2005 court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding the immunity of Saudi officials and entities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court rules that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki are immune from suit for official acts. It also discusses the National Commercial Bank's (NCB) claim to immunity as a government instrumentality of Saudi Arabia, analyzing share ownership by the Public Investment Fund (PIF) and transactions involving the bin Mahfouz family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017853.jpg
This document is page 788 from a legal opinion in the Federal Supplement (349 F.Supp.2d) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It addresses whether immunity extends to Prince Sultan and Prince Turki of Saudi Arabia for actions taken in their official capacities. The text references a complaint filed on September 10, 2003, where plaintiffs argued Prince Turki was not entitled to immunity because he was serving as the Ambassador to the UK at the time. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017851.jpg
This document is page 786 from a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely *In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details allegations by plaintiffs that Prince Turki (Head of Saudi Intelligence) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided financial and logistical support to al Qaeda and the Taliban, including facilitating money transfers and supporting charities linked to terrorism. The text also outlines Prince Turki's defense, where he denies these claims, citing his official role in attempting to extradite Osama bin Laden and Saudi Arabia's severance of ties with the Taliban in 1998. NOTE: While the prompt mentions Epstein, this specific page deals exclusively with 9/11 litigation and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017849.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal reporter (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) detailing civil litigation related to the 9/11 attacks (specifically the 'Burnett' and 'Ashton' complaints). It outlines allegations against Saudi Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, claiming he funded Islamic charities (IIRO, Al Haramain, MWL, WAMY) that served as fronts for Al Qaeda. The text details a 1990 meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden, and notes $6 million in personal contributions from Sultan to these organizations since 1994.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017848.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the legal standards for jurisdictional discovery when sovereign immunity is asserted and begins detailing allegations against Prince Sultan of Saudi Arabia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017846.jpg
This document is page 781 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York concerning 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details procedural history, specifically oral arguments heard in October 2004 regarding motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi banking, corporate, and individual defendants (including the Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) based on lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, though no direct textual link to Jeffrey Epstein appears on this specific page.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Prince Turki | Saudi-based chari... | $0.00 | Personal contributions to charities allegedly k... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Prince Turki | Saudi charities | $0.00 | Allegations that Prince Turki made personal don... | View |
Palestinian problem / Relations with West
An ominous column warning of widening ideological distances and consequences for Israel.
Extradition of Osama bin Laden
Relay official Saudi request that Osama bin Laden be extradited to Saudi Arabia for trial.
Information Sharing
Served on a joint information-sharing committee with the United States.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity