| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ali
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mohamed
|
No direct link established |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
two other unnamed defendants
|
Alleged co conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Turki
|
Antagonistic official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Kingdom (Saudi Arabia)
|
Willful ignorance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Erik Prince
|
Thematic comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CIA
|
Alleged asset liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Suleiman al Rajhi
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Turki
|
Alleged facilitator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Abdel Abdul Jalil Batterjee
|
Alleged supporter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Enaam M. Arnaout
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NAL
|
Supporter affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Al Rajhi family
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Al Shamal Bank
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wa’el Julaidan
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ayman al-Zawahri
|
Professional hierarchical |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ICA
|
Alleged financier beneficiary |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bakr bin Laden
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Tariq bin Laden
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Batterjee
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Kamel
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sultan
|
Meeting alleged funding support |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mohammed Jamal Khalife
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ayman al-Zawahiri
|
Friend |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Funding of Osama bin Laden | Sudan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged provision of material support to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda. | Sudan (implied context) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden following Iraq's invasion of Kuw... | Unknown (likely Saudi Arabia) | View |
| 2011-05-02 | N/A | Raid on Osama bin Laden's compound where he was killed and evidence (SSE) was collected. | Bin Laden's compound | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | bin Laden raid | Pakistan | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | Killing of Osama bin Laden (referenced event) | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | Killing of Osama bin Laden | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | Operation to kill Osama bin Laden using Navy SEALs. | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | Death of Osama bin Laden | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | The killing of Osama bin Laden | Pakistan (implied) | View |
| 2007-09-01 | N/A | Eve of the sixth anniversary of 9/11. | N/A | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | The 9/11 terrorist attacks (referred to as 'when the Twin Towers fell 10 years ago'). | New York, The Pentagon | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Terrorist Attacks | United States | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | African embassy bombings | Africa | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | Bombing of United States embassies. | Nairobi and Dar es Salaam | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | al-Qaeda's abrupt departure from Sudan to Afghanistan. | Sudan to Afghanistan | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | Osama bin Laden declared war on Americans | Global | View |
| 1995-01-01 | N/A | Osama bin Laden identified Human Concern International Society as a supporter. | Unknown | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Stripping of Osama bin Laden's citizenship | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Osama bin Laden began singling out the US for attack | N/A | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Establishment of Al Shamal Bank | Sudan (implied) | View |
| 1988-01-01 | N/A | Founding of al-Qaeda by Bin Laden and Azzam. | Afghanistan | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Facilitation of jihad operations | Sudan | View |
| 1980-01-01 | N/A | Osama bin Laden traveled to Afghanistan to participate in the jihad. | Afghanistan | View |
| 1971-01-01 | N/A | Family picture taken featuring Young Osama bin Laden. | Sweden | View |
This document is a judgment from the European Court of Human Rights regarding the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. The United Kingdom, concerning the extradition of six terrorism suspects (including Abu Hamza) to the United States. The applicants argued that extradition would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the risk of solitary confinement at ADX Florence and the possibility of grossly disproportionate life sentences. The Court unanimously ruled that extradition would not violate Article 3, finding that conditions at ADX Florence and the potential sentences did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
An internal SDNY email dated October 7, 2020, distributing daily news clippings. The digest highlights articles specifically about Ghislaine Maxwell (prosecutors withholding photos, lawyer connections) and other general interest legal/political news involving figures like Trump, Giuliani, and Steve Bannon.
This document appears to be page 16 of a briefing paper or policy summary produced during the House Oversight Committee investigations. It summarizes the Obama administration's stance and actions regarding the Afghanistan/Pakistan conflict and domestic military spending cuts around the year 2011. It specifically references the withdrawal of surge troops, the death of bin Laden, and a proposed $400 billion cut to defense spending.
This document, dated November 16, 2011, outlines Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials and overview as part of a larger report. It details major initiatives such as the Afghanistan surge, the New START treaty, and the killing of Osama bin Laden, while analyzing how his foreign policy record might serve as a centerpiece for his reelection strategy amidst economic challenges.
This page, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031940, contains an article or report excerpt written by journalist Burak Bekdil. The text analyzes death tolls in Middle Eastern conflicts, citing research by Gunnar Heinsohn and Daniel Pipes to argue that the vast majority of Muslim deaths in the region are caused by other Muslims rather than the Arab-Israeli conflict. It concludes with a famous quote by former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir.
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report analyzing intelligence gathered after the raid on Osama Bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad. It details Bin Laden's 'hands-on' leadership style, his paranoia regarding security and drone attacks (which he called the 'intelligence war'), and the internal friction between Zawahiri and other operatives like Atiyah. The text also notes that analysts found no evidence ('smoking gun') of Pakistani government complicity in hiding Bin Laden.
This document is a Washington Post article by David Ignatius titled '10 years after 9/11, al-Qaeda is down but not out.' It details the intelligence gathered from the May 2 raid on Osama bin Laden's compound, specifically focusing on communications between bin Laden and his deputy Atiyah Abd al-Rahman regarding plans for a significant attack on the U.S. involving economic targets. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a Congressional production.
This document is page 4 of a text, stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It contains an opinion piece by Michael Tomasky (Newsweek/Daily Beast) analyzing the 'Obama Doctrine' of foreign policy. The text defends Obama's prudent, multilateral approach to conflicts in Syria and Libya, contrasts it with the 'Bush Doctrine' applied to Iraq, and mentions the control of $37 billion in Libyan assets. While part of a document dump that may contain Epstein-related materials, this specific page is political commentary on US foreign policy circa 2011.
This document is a page from a House Oversight Committee file containing a reprint of a New York Times opinion piece by Roger Cohen titled 'Iran Without Nukes,' published on June 13, 2011. The article discusses the political climate in Iran two years after the 2009 election protests, referencing the Green Movement and quoting academics Hamid Dabashi and Nader Hashemi regarding democracy and civil rights in the Middle East. While part of a larger discovery batch (indicated by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031895), the text itself focuses on geopolitical analysis of US-Iran relations and does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or his associates on this page.
This page appears to be a printout of an internet listicle or historical trivia compilation found within a larger evidence cache (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). It describes two historical items: an incident involving opera singer Maria Callas being sued in Chicago in 1955, and a description of a 1971 family photo of Osama bin Laden in Sweden (though the photo itself is not visible). The document contains no direct text references to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
This document is page 30 of a Westlaw printout detailing a court order from 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). The text outlines the court's rulings on various motions to dismiss filed by numerous defendants, including charities, financial entities (National Commercial Bank), and individuals such as Tarik Hamdi, Abdulrahman Alamoudi, and members of the Saudi royal family (Prince Salman and Prince Naif mentioned in footnotes). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
A Westlaw printout of a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929. The text detailed the court's decision to dismiss complaints against various entities (including Mar-Jac Poultry, IIIT, and African Muslim Agency) alleged to be part of the 'SAAR Network' and accused of funding al Qaeda or Islamic Jihad. The court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide specific factual grounds that these entities knew their donations were funding terrorism. There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in the text of this specific page.
This document is page 23 of a legal opinion from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539), printed from Westlaw with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It discusses the dismissal of certain claims (TVPA, negligence) against defendants including the IIRO, SAAR Network, and Tarik Hamdi, while analyzing RICO liability standards. A specific section details allegations against Tarik Hamdi, accusing him of supplying a satellite phone battery to Osama bin Laden in 1996, which was subsequently used to coordinate the African embassy bombings.
This document is page 20 of a legal opinion (392 F.Supp.2d 539) regarding *In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*. It discusses the court's jurisdiction over defendants Wa'el Jalaidan and the Rabita Trust, detailing Jalaidan's alleged role as a founder and logistics chief for al Qaeda and his connections to Osama bin Laden. While the document bears a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017923), often associated with broader financial investigations, the text itself focuses strictly on 9/11 terrorist financing liability and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This page from a court opinion discusses motions to dismiss regarding jurisdiction over Saudi princes and the Rabita Trust in litigation related to the September 11, 2001 attacks. The court grants the motions to dismiss for Prince Salman and Prince Naif due to a lack of minimum contacts with the United States necessary for personal jurisdiction. The document also begins discussing allegations against the Rabita Trust, including its designation as a terrorist entity and alleged ties to al Qaeda.
This document is page 17 of a legal opinion titled 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539), bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017920. The text discusses the court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Saudi Prince Naif and Prince Salman regarding their official acts under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), while analyzing whether personal jurisdiction exists for alleged private acts or conspiracy with al Qaeda. It details Prince Naif's role as Minister of Interior, his 1994 actions against Osama bin Laden, and the legal standards for establishing jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute and conspiracy theories.
This document is a page from a court opinion regarding the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, specifically discussing allegations against Saudi Princes Salman and Naif. It details claims that Prince Salman and Prince Naif used their positions and various charities (such as the SHC, IIRO, and SJRC) to fund and support Islamic militants, including Al Qaeda and Hamas, in regions like Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Palestine. The text cites various complaints alleging the princes knowingly supported terrorist networks and ignored warnings from Western governments.
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 court case, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, detailing allegations against the Saudi High Commission (SHC) and Prince Salman for funding and supporting terrorism. It outlines claims that the SHC diverted charitable funds to al Qaeda, employed terrorists in Bosnia, and possessed incriminating materials related to attacks on U.S. targets.
This page from a legal opinion (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) addresses motions to dismiss in the Ashton and Burnett cases involving terrorism allegations. The court dismisses claims against Al Baraka and Mr. Kamel due to insufficient factual allegations, denies NCB's motion to dismiss without prejudice pending discovery on immunity and jurisdiction, and allows limited jurisdictional discovery regarding the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG).
This document is a page from a court opinion in the case "In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001." It dismisses complaints against Arab Bank for lack of factual evidence linking them to terrorism financing and introduces claims against Al Baraka Investment & Development Corporation and Saleh Abdullah Kamel regarding their alleged ties to al Qaeda and the 9/11 hijackers through subsidiaries and employees like Omar al Bayoumi. The text details allegations involving financial support for hijackers in San Diego and banking ties deemed suspicious by Israel.
This document is page 834 from a Federal Supplement (349 F. Supp. 2d) concerning 9/11-related litigation (Ashton and Burnett complaints). It details the court's decision to grant Saudi American Bank's motion to dismiss claims that it provided material support to al Qaeda. It also introduces allegations against Arab Bank regarding its financial support for terrorist organizations, including al Qaeda and Hamas, and its alleged role in facilitating the September 11 attacks. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
This document is page 833 from a 2005 Federal Court opinion (In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding motions to dismiss by various banking defendants. The text details the court's decision to grant Al Rajhi Bank's motion to dismiss due to a lack of factual allegations connecting the bank to terrorist financing. It also introduces background on the Saudi American Bank, its formation from Citibank branches, and allegations regarding its employees' potential ties to Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda financing.
This document is a page from a legal opinion (Federal Supplement) regarding the 'Burnett Plaintiffs' lawsuit against Al Rajhi Bank concerning liability for the September 11 attacks and terror financing. The text details allegations that Al Rajhi Bank and its owners funded fronts for Hamas (Tulkarm Charity Committee) and al Qaeda, and discusses the legal standards for liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp but does not mention Jeffrey Epstein; it focuses entirely on banking compliance and terrorism financing litigation.
This document is page 825 of a 2005 U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) opinion titled 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text focuses on denying a motion by defendant Mr. Batterjee to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, citing his ties to Al Shamal Islamic Bank, Al Qaeda, and the Benevolence International Foundation (BIF), as well as his travel to Chicago and Florida. It also outlines the legal standards for a 'Failure to State a Claim' and the definition of material support under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). The document bears a House Oversight stamp, but contains no textual references to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a federal court opinion regarding the 'Burnett' litigation, involving claims against Abdel Abdul Jalil Batterjee, the Benevolence International Foundation (BIF), and the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY) for alleged ties to Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. The text details allegations that Batterjee funded BIF, commissioned a biography of Bin Laden, and transferred control of the charity to Enaam Arnaout, who was indicted for roles in the 9/11 attacks. Batterjee disputes these claims, denying financial support to BIF after 1993 and denying knowledge of Bin Laden's activities, while also contesting jurisdiction and service of process.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Osama bin Laden | Al Shamal Bank | $50,000,000.00 | Capital contribution to the bank around the tim... | View |
| 1991-01-01 | Paid | Osama bin Laden | Al Shamal Bank | $50,000,000.00 | Capital provided to establish the bank | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Received | Saudi Binladin Group | Osama bin Laden | $1,000,000.00 | Annual disbursements. | View |
Reached agreement that al-Qaeda would use MWL offices to launch attacks.
Bin Laden purportedly offered his family's support to Saudi military forces after Iraq invaded Kuwait.
Fatwa expressing extreme bitterness toward Saudi Royal family.
Delivery of a battery for a satellite phone used by Osama bin Laden to coordinate bombings.
Communications regarding who might carry out strikes, proposing and rejecting names.
Warning to reject capitalist way of life and embrace Islam to end the Iraq war.
Note regarding al Qaeda's need for weapons, found during Bosnian raid of BIF offices.
Acknowledged close ties to Wa’el Julaidan.
The ruling to kill Americans and their allies is an individual duty for every Muslim.
Asserted the American enemy is the main cause of the situation and efforts should be concentrated on destroying them.
Diatribes delivered before leaving Saudi Arabia.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity