Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Anita Hill

Person
Mentions
10
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Judge Thomas
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015038.jpg

This document is a Table of Contents page from a manuscript or book, bearing the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015038'. The content appears to be a collection of satirical or counter-culture essays (resembling the work of Paul Krassner) covering topics such as religion, presidential sex lives, and subcultures. It lists chapter titles referencing figures like Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky, and Sarah Palin.

Table of contents / manuscript page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025203.jpg

This document appears to be a narrative excerpt (possibly from a book or memoir) labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025203'. It depicts a scene in a Senate office where Judge (Clarence) Thomas describes a graphic pornographic film involving a donkey to Senators Simpson and Hatch, who joke about it. The narrator, observing the 'boys' locker room' atmosphere, decides to leak Anita Hill's statement to the press after Thomas mentions Hill's views on abortion.

Narrative excerpt / congressional record exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.jpg

An email from Jeffrey E. (Epstein) to Paul Krassner dated September 18, 2018. Epstein responds with the single word 'great' to an email from Krassner that contains a satirical or investigative piece titled 'Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit,' which describes a 1991 conversation between Clarence Thomas and Senators Hatch and Simpson.

Email
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028442.jpg

This document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028442', is a commentary piece from circa late September 2018 analyzing the cultural impact of the #MeToo movement in the context of the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation. It focuses on the allegations made by Deborah Ramirez, as reported in The New Yorker, arguing that women are increasingly demanding that their fragmented but deeply felt memories of trauma be taken seriously, even against staunch denials from powerful men. The author contrasts Ramirez's case with the past experiences of Anita Hill and the more recent, tragic story of Amber Wyatt to illustrate a shift in expectations about whose stories are heard and believed.

News article / commentary (submitted as evidence to house oversight)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search