DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg

995 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (condensed)
File Size: 995 KB
Summary

This document is a condensed transcript (pages 221-224) from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. It features the testimony of Ms. Conrad, a suspended New York attorney who served as a juror in a complex tax shelter fraud case presided over by Judge Pauley. The questioning revolves around her motives for serving on the jury while suspended, specifically whether she used the service to demonstrate stability for her bar reinstatement petition, which she denies.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ms. Conrad Witness/Juror
A suspended New York attorney being questioned about her service as a juror in a previous trial (Daugerdas).
Mr. Okula Attorney
Conducting cross-examination of Ms. Conrad.
Mr. Gair Attorney
Conducting redirect examination of Ms. Conrad.
Judge Pauley Judge
The judge presiding over the trial Ms. Conrad served on as a juror.
Paul M. Daugerdas Defendant (Case Title)
Named in the case caption: United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States of America
Plaintiff in the case.
Southern District Reporters
Court reporting service.
New York Bar
Implied organization regarding Ms. Conrad's suspension and petition for reinstatement.

Timeline (2 events)

December 20th (Year unspecified)
Previous appearance by Ms. Conrad in court.
Courtroom
February 15, 2012
Court testimony of Ms. Conrad regarding her juror service.
Courtroom

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of Ms. Conrad's attorney license.
Venue of the trial.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Conrad Juror/Judge Judge Pauley
Ms. Conrad served as a juror in a case presided over by Judge Pauley.
Mr. Okula Opposing Counsel Mr. Gair
Okula conducts cross, Gair conducts redirect; Gair objects to Okula's questions.

Key Quotes (4)

"At the time that you were selected to serve as a juror in this case, your status was a suspended New York attorney, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg
Quote #1
"It's apples and oranges. The two thoughts never crossed."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg
Quote #2
"Not at all. It was my civic duty."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg
Quote #3
"Which part was your civic duty? The part where you lied?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,689 characters)

Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 646-10 Filed 05/24/22 Page 47 of 67
A-5665
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
February 15, 2012
[Page 221]
C2frdau7 Conrad - cross
1 MR. OKULA: Let me have one moment, your Honor.
2 Q. Ms. Conrad, a few more questions. I'm sorry. Are you
3 ready?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. At the time that you were selected to serve as a juror in
6 this case, your status was a suspended New York attorney,
7 correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. You were not working, correct?
10 A. Correct.
11 Q. Is it fair to say that even though the daily witness fee
12 that you received for your service was rather meager, it was
13 not irrelevant to you in your service as a juror?
14 A. Yes, that's correct.
15 Q. After all, you were basically out of work, correct?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. You referred earlier during Mr. Gair's questioning to a
18 motivation that you had in the form of intellectual curiosity
19 with respect to tax shelters, is that correct?
20 MR. GAIR: Objection to the form of the question, your
21 Honor.
22 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.
23 THE COURT: All right.
24 Q. You remember in Judge Pauley's initial instructions he
25 described in general terms the subject matter of the case, in
[Page 222]
C2frdau7 Conrad - cross
1 particular tax charges, correct?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. You heard certain things about tax shelters in the
4 introductory instructions, correct?
5 A. Vaguely.
6 Q. Is it correct that the subject matter of the case was of
7 some interest to you when you were answering questions during
8 voir dire and considering your motives for serving on the jury?
9 A. Yes, it piqued my curiosity. I had no experience ever with
10 tax work.
11 Q. Had you ever sat as a juror in a federal criminal case
12 before?
13 A. No.
14 Q. Was one of your motivations a desire to see a trial through
15 with this complexity from beginning to end?
16 A. Partially.
17 Q. One final question, Ms. Conrad. Is it correct that you
18 waited until Judge Pauley told you it was appropriate for you
19 to begin your deliberations and the consideration of the
20 evidence based on his instructions, and that's what guided your
21 verdict in this case?
22 A. Yes.
23 MR. OKULA: I have nothing further, Judge.
24 THE COURT: Redirect examination, Mr. Gair.
25 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
[Page 223]
C2frdau7 Conrad - redirect
1 BY MR. GAIR:
2 Q. Can you explain to us how it is you can remember the
3 substance of many specific jury instructions that you received
4 8 1/2 months ago when you cannot remember things that you said to
5 Judge Pauley on December 20th when you appeared in this court?
6 A. Because I'm familiar with the PJI and they are sort of
7 basically the same IN state court as in federal court.
8 Q. Did you have any trouble understanding my questions when I
9 was asking you questions earlier?
10 A. To which are you referring?
11 Q. Any of them.
12 A. I don't have the transcript written in my head.
13 Q. You certainly didn't have any trouble with Mr. Okula's
14 questions, correct?
15 A. He's pretty straightforward.
16 Q. You didn't find anything that Mr. Okula said that you
17 disagreed with, correct?
18 A. Correct.
19 Q. Did you know what Mr. Okula was going to ask you today?
20 A. No, I don't. This is the first time I've ever actually
21 spoken to Mr. Okula.
22 Q. Mr. Okula asked you about whether or not you wanted to see
23 through this trial as a juror. Do you remember that question?
24 A. Yes.
25 Q. You did, right?
[Page 224]
C2frdau7 Conrad - redirect
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. You did that in the context of just a day or two before the
3 trial having filed a petition for readmission or reinstatement
4 to the bar, is that correct?
5 A. That's the correct chronology, yes.
6 Q. You believed that by seeing through this trial, by serving
7 as a juror for a lengthy trial, you could help demonstrate your
8 stability to the bar authorities, correct?
9 A. No. It's apples and oranges. The two thoughts never
10 crossed.
11 Q. Never occurred to you once that seeing this through might
12 be something that would be helpful to you with the bar
13 authorities?
14 A. Not at all. It was my civic duty.
15 Q. Which part was your civic duty? The part where you lied?
16 A. No, of course not.
17 Q. Mr. Okula asked you some questions about the instructions
18 that Judge Pauley gave you. Do you remember those?
19 A. I remember both.
20 Q. You said that you had followed Judge Pauley's instructions,
21 correct?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. But the truth is you only followed those of Judge Pauley's
24 instructions that you wanted to follow, correct?
25 A. I don't know what that question means, sir.
Page 221 - Page 224 (56) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS
DOJ-OGR-00009948

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document