This document is a condensed transcript (pages 221-224) from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. It features the testimony of Ms. Conrad, a suspended New York attorney who served as a juror in a complex tax shelter fraud case presided over by Judge Pauley. The questioning revolves around her motives for serving on the jury while suspended, specifically whether she used the service to demonstrate stability for her bar reinstatement petition, which she denies.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Conrad | Witness/Juror |
A suspended New York attorney being questioned about her service as a juror in a previous trial (Daugerdas).
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Conducting cross-examination of Ms. Conrad.
|
| Mr. Gair | Attorney |
Conducting redirect examination of Ms. Conrad.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
The judge presiding over the trial Ms. Conrad served on as a juror.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant (Case Title) |
Named in the case caption: United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff in the case.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters |
Court reporting service.
|
|
| New York Bar |
Implied organization regarding Ms. Conrad's suspension and petition for reinstatement.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of Ms. Conrad's attorney license.
|
|
|
Venue of the trial.
|
"At the time that you were selected to serve as a juror in this case, your status was a suspended New York attorney, correct?"Source
"It's apples and oranges. The two thoughts never crossed."Source
"Not at all. It was my civic duty."Source
"Which part was your civic duty? The part where you lied?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,689 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document