Saudi Arabia
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
|
Financial |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
United States
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Iyad Allawi
|
Political support |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Political economic |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Geopolitical rivals |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Military supplier |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Strategic alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial cold war |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Denmark-Norway
|
Economic comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BofA Merrill Lynch
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Israel
|
Geopolitical |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Diplomatic economic |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Egypt
|
Diplomatic |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USA
|
Allies |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Holocaust survivors
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The West (US)
|
Political alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Muslim Brotherhood
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial deterrence |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Bahrain
|
Military support alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial geopolitical rivals |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bahrain (Ruling Family)
|
Allies |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Alliance dependency |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jamie Fullerton
|
Alleged connection |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Egypt
|
Diplomatic tension |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Saudi Arabia lifted 'unofficial ban' on citizens traveling to Lebanon | Lebanon | View |
| N/A | N/A | Laying the foundation stone for the King Salman Bridge. | Red Sea (between Saudi Arab... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Delimitation of maritime boundaries (transfer of Tiran and Sanafir islands). | Red Sea | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attempted arms sale via emergency powers | Washington D.C. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Development of entertainment sector (theme parks, cinemas) | Saudi Arabia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lebanese Civil War involving proxy militias. | Lebanon | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed arms sale to Saudi Arabia via emergency powers. | USA/Saudi Arabia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bahraini Protests/Crackdown | Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | War on Houthi in Yemen | Yemen | View |
| 2030-01-01 | N/A | Vision 2030 | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Target date for increasing religious tourists (Hajj and Umrah) by an estimated 10mn per annum. | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Ongoing political negotiations regarding Yemen conflict | Kuwait | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Implementation of Saudi Vision 2030 | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Passage of the 9/11 Saudi bill (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act) | USA | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Order of 22 Hawk trainers placed. | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | Saudi Arabia exported c.1mbpd of oil products. | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 2011-03-14 | N/A | Saudi armed vehicles and tanks entered Bahrain under the aegis of the Gulf Cooperation Council. | Bahrain | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Intervention to quell domestic unrest | Bahrain | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Negative experience with militias (Houthis). | Yemen/Saudi Border | View |
| 1998-09-01 | N/A | Saudi Arabia suspended diplomatic relations with the Taliban. | Unspecified | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | Bombing of Khobar Towers. | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 1988-01-01 | N/A | Purchase of stakes in US refineries. | USA | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017884.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001'. It details the arguments of National Commercial Bank (NCB) against US jurisdiction, citing the closure of its NYC branch in 1992, the dissolution of its subsidiary SNCB Securities Inc. in 2001, and its lack of physical presence or general business solicitation in the US. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017883.jpg
This document is a page from a Federal Supplement court opinion (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the court's decision to grant Mr. Al-Husani's motion to dismiss due to lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient evidence linking him to the 'Golden Chain' list of al Qaeda donors. The document also introduces the analysis of jurisdiction over NCB (National Commercial Bank), noting Plaintiffs' arguments regarding NCB's subsidiary in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017881.jpg
This document is a page from a Federal Supplement court opinion (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) discussing motions to dismiss by Saudi defendants. The court grants the motion to dismiss for Prince Mohamed, ruling that his role as an officer of DMI, IICG, and FIBS does not establish personal jurisdiction in the U.S. and that there is no evidence linking him to al Qaeda financing. It also introduces the Estate of Mohammad Abdullah Aljomaih as a defendant added in May 2003. While the prompt mentions Epstein, this specific page pertains to 9/11 litigation and contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion discussing allegations against Prince Mohamed regarding the financing of terrorism through financial institutions like Al Shamal Islamic Bank and various charities. The text details claims by plaintiffs that Prince Mohamed provided material support to al Qaeda and questions whether the court has personal jurisdiction over him based on his contacts with the United States.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017869.jpg
This is page 804 of a legal opinion from the Federal Supplement (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, though the case name is not explicitly at the top). It details the court's decision to grant the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's motion to dismiss a complaint based on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The text also discusses standards for Personal Jurisdiction and the New York Long-Arm Statute, citing various legal precedents. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
This document is page 803 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York (2005) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details the Federal Plaintiffs' allegations that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia aided terrorists through various charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and the Kingdom's defense based on sovereign immunity and findings from the 9/11 Commission Report stating no evidence was found of Saudi institutional funding. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court opinion discussing motions to dismiss in a case involving allegations of material support for terrorism. It analyzes legal precedents such as *Halberstam* and *Boim* to determine if Prince Turki and Prince Sultan can be held liable for supporting charities allegedly linked to al Qaeda, noting distinctions regarding when organizations were officially designated as terrorists. The court examines whether plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient facts to show the defendants knew the charities were fronts for illegal activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017862.jpg
This document is page 797 of a legal opinion titled 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (349 F.Supp.2d 765). It details legal arguments regarding subject matter jurisdiction and the 'torts exception' to sovereign immunity, specifically addressing allegations against Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki for allegedly funding al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through Islamic charities. While the user prompt mentions Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page; the document is focused entirely on 9/11 litigation and liability under New York law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017858.jpg
This document is page 793 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and rules that alleged money laundering or charitable contributions by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki do not constitute 'commercial activity' that would strip them of sovereign immunity. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017857.jpg
This document is page 792 of a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, based on context and case citations). It discusses a motion by the National Commercial Bank (NCB) to dismiss a case based on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court denies the motion without prejudice, ordering 'limited jurisdictional discovery' to determine if the Public Investment Fund (PIF) qualifies as a political subdivision of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The document also references exceptions to sovereign immunity, including 'state sponsor of terrorism' and 'commercial activities.' The footer indicates this document was part of a House Oversight Committee production. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017855.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (Federal Supplement) included in a House Oversight Committee production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017855). It analyzes the legal status of the Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), specifically referencing the 'Dole Food' Supreme Court standard for direct ownership. The text argues that for the National Commercial Bank (NCB) to enjoy immunity, the PIF (its owner) must be proven to be an organ or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, citing affidavits from the Saudi Ministry of Finance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017854.jpg
This page is from a 2005 court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding the immunity of Saudi officials and entities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court rules that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki are immune from suit for official acts. It also discusses the National Commercial Bank's (NCB) claim to immunity as a government instrumentality of Saudi Arabia, analyzing share ownership by the Public Investment Fund (PIF) and transactions involving the bin Mahfouz family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017853.jpg
This document is page 788 from a legal opinion in the Federal Supplement (349 F.Supp.2d) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It addresses whether immunity extends to Prince Sultan and Prince Turki of Saudi Arabia for actions taken in their official capacities. The text references a complaint filed on September 10, 2003, where plaintiffs argued Prince Turki was not entitled to immunity because he was serving as the Ambassador to the UK at the time. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017852.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) detailing allegations against the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and its leadership, specifically Khalid bin Mahfouz. It discusses claims that NCB and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) facilitated financial support for al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through charities and direct funding. The text references various legal complaints (Ashton, Burnett) and begins a discussion on the defendants' status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017851.jpg
This document is page 786 from a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely *In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details allegations by plaintiffs that Prince Turki (Head of Saudi Intelligence) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided financial and logistical support to al Qaeda and the Taliban, including facilitating money transfers and supporting charities linked to terrorism. The text also outlines Prince Turki's defense, where he denies these claims, citing his official role in attempting to extradite Osama bin Laden and Saudi Arabia's severance of ties with the Taliban in 1998. NOTE: While the prompt mentions Epstein, this specific page deals exclusively with 9/11 litigation and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017849.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal reporter (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) detailing civil litigation related to the 9/11 attacks (specifically the 'Burnett' and 'Ashton' complaints). It outlines allegations against Saudi Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, claiming he funded Islamic charities (IIRO, Al Haramain, MWL, WAMY) that served as fronts for Al Qaeda. The text details a 1990 meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden, and notes $6 million in personal contributions from Sultan to these organizations since 1994.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017848.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the legal standards for jurisdictional discovery when sovereign immunity is asserted and begins detailing allegations against Prince Sultan of Saudi Arabia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017847.jpg
This document is page 782 from a court opinion discussing subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It outlines the legal standards for immunity of foreign states, citing precedents like *Saudi Arabia v. Nelson* and *Virtual Countries v. Republic of South Africa*, and details the burden of proof required for plaintiffs to challenge a foreign state's immunity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017843.jpg
This document is a page from a legal reporter (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) containing headnotes (summaries of legal points) 96 through 102. The text details legal rulings regarding the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) and civil lawsuits filed by survivors of the September 11, 2001, attacks against various financial institutions and companies in Saudi Arabia and Egypt. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp (indicating it is part of a Congressional investigation, likely related to Deutsche Bank/Epstein financial probes), the text itself strictly concerns 9/11 litigation, sovereign immunity, and jurisdictional discovery regarding terrorist financing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017839.jpg
This document is page 774 from 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series, containing legal headnotes (61-67) regarding the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) litigation following the September 11, 2001 attacks. The text details court rulings on personal jurisdiction over Saudi Arabian princes, banks, and individuals alleged to be on the 'Golden Chain' donor list for al Qaeda. While found in a House Oversight Committee file (likely related to investigations into financial institutions used by Epstein), the text itself focuses strictly on 9/11-related jurisdictional case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017835.jpg
This document contains legal headnotes from a court case involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) in relation to the September 11, 2001 attacks. It details court rulings that alleged actions by a Saudi Prince and Saudi Arabia—such as charitable contributions and intelligence decisions—fell under the "discretionary function exception" of the FSIA, thereby barring claims from victims' survivors. It also touches on procedural standards for motions to dismiss regarding personal jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017832.jpg
This document is a page of legal headnotes from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (349 F.Supp.2d 765), dated 2005. It outlines legal standards regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), jurisdiction, and the immunity of foreign officials, specifically mentioning the Director of Saudi Arabia's Department of General Intelligence. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a Congressional document production, potentially related to investigations into 9/11 or financial oversight, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017831.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Supplement (349 F. Supp. 2d 766) summarizing legal holdings by Judge Casey regarding civil litigation stemming from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The page outlines 17 specific holdings concerning jurisdiction, sovereign immunity (FSIA), and liability regarding claims brought by survivors and insurance carriers against Saudi Arabia, Saudi Princes, banks, and charities alleged to have supported Al Qaeda. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, though the content specifically concerns 9/11 litigation rather than Jeffrey Epstein directly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017595.jpg
This document appears to be a composite of excerpts and analysis from a House Oversight production. It extensively quotes Peter Dale Scott's 'The American Deep State' regarding the 9/11 Commission's alleged protection of intelligence connections and the role of Saudi/Qatari royals. The text transitions into a conspiratorial analysis linking 'Clinton's daughter' to terrorism ops and notably mentions a 'Bud Horton' (formerly of Accenture) moving to South Carolina after being implicated in a 'continuing child sex scandal,' suggesting a nexus between intelligence operations, cyber crime, and illicit activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017524.jpg
This document is a program brochure for the Swedish-American Life Science Summit (SALSS) 2012, held in Stockholm from August 22-24, 2012. It lists the organizing committee and senior advisory board, which includes Dr. William A. Haseltine (a known name in Epstein-related files) representing ACCESS Health International. The document also features a list of corporate sponsors and an essay on global demographics and economics by Hans Rosling.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity