MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A discussion of the legal standard (the McDonough standard) for granting a new trial based on a j... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interaction | MAXWELL subsequently interacted with Minor Victim-1 on multiple occasions at Epstein’s residences. | Epstein’s residences | View |
| N/A | Trip | Jane was induced to travel across state lines to New York for the purpose of being abused. She tr... | New York | View |
| N/A | Conviction | Maxwell was convicted for conspiracy, transportation of a minor, and sex trafficking following a ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Motion to compel | Giuffre moved to compel Maxwell to answer additional intimate and personal questions that she had... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Jane met Maxwell and Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | Juan Alessi witnessed driving Jane, Maxwell, and Epstein to a plane and watched them board together. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | An unidentified commercial return flight from New Mexico for Jane, which Maxwell allegedly arrang... | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury's indictment of Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | A conversation between Maxwell and Kate where Maxwell stated Epstein needed massages constantly. ... | A building with stairs and ... | View |
| N/A | Massage | Maxwell gave Annie Farmer a massage in which she massaged her pectoral muscles. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Epstein sexually abused Minor Victim-3 during massages that were arranged and encouraged by MAXWELL. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crossing state lines (mann act offense) | The defendant, Epstein, and Jane crossed state lines, and Epstein flew Jane to New York with Maxw... | New York | View |
| N/A | Legal ruling | Chief Judge McMahon granted the Government's application, finding Maxwell's reliance on a protect... | Court | View |
| N/A | Trip | A. Farmer took a trip to New Mexico, which she later chose not to write about in her journal beca... | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Shopping trip | Maxwell and Epstein purchased boots for A. Farmer. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Jane was sexually abused by Maxwell and Epstein during so-called massages. This included being fo... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Group encounters | Maxwell and Epstein would sometimes involve Jane in horrifying group encounters with other women. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Maxwell and Epstein took Jane, a 14-year-old girl, on weekend trips to New York. | New York | View |
| N/A | Trip | Virginia Roberts traveled with Epstein and Maxwell on Epstein's private plane. | New York and the Virgin Isl... | View |
| N/A | Trial | The Maxwell trial, where a large number of exhibits were admitted and later made available to the... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip/isolation | Annie was lured to New Mexico where she found herself isolated with only Maxwell and Epstein, con... | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | Negotiation of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Jane was sexually abused by Maxwell and Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Information exchange | Carolyn gave her cell phone number, her mom's cell phone number, and Shawn's home phone number to... | N/A | View |
EFTA00020540.pdf
This document is an internal email thread between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated October 17, 2018. The correspondence circulates a legal opinion by Judge Sweet regarding the 'Right of Public Access Judicial Document' in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, which the sender noted reading about in the New York Law Journal (NYLJ).
EFTA00020493.pdf
An FBI Intake report dated August 20, 2020, detailing a call from a male source in Essex, NY, who claims to have worked with Leslie Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein and was pardoned by a U.S. President. The caller reported contacting a female victim in Manhattan who is writing a book and is in touch with hundreds of other victims. The caller alleged the existence of films recording prominent men, specifically naming Epstein, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump, as well as Maxwell, and inquired about who hired Epstein at 'Bear' (likely Bear Stearns).
EFTA00020392.pdf
This document is an email dated July 10, 2020, sent to an individual at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email attaches a scheduling order for Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming detention/bail hearing and discusses logistics, specifically noting that the order contains dial-in information for public audio access which can be provided to victims if requested.
EFTA00020102.pdf
This document is an internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated October 11, 2021. The email transmits draft letters addressed to the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) regarding 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell), as indicated by the attachment filenames. The email includes the sender's signature block with the SDNY office address.
EFTA00019928.pdf
This document is an email dated December 2, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Maxwell' case. The email discusses an attached order from Judge Nathan which requires the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal team to file a letter with the court by the following Friday. The sender requests a call to discuss the matter.
EFTA00019914.pdf
This document is an email dated June 19, 2021, between personnel at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the management of legal files. The sender requests a contractor to save attached PDF 'prep notes' related to testifying witnesses into specific '3500 folders' (referring to Jencks Act material) on the 'Epstein share drive' in preparation for the Maxwell trial.
EFTA00019193.pdf
This document is an email header dated October 10, 2021, transmitting a document titled 'Maxwell Jury Questionnaire'. The attachment appears to be a legal draft coordinating jury selection questions between the Defense and the Government (prosecution), likely for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00019043.pdf
This document is an email dated October 8, 2021, concerning the preparation of jury questionnaires and voir dire questions, likely for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial as indicated by the attachment filename. The sender discusses difficulties in combining drafts from opposing legal teams and schedules a conferral for that afternoon to discuss the documents further.
EFTA00018707.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted email from February 22, 2021, exchanged between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line 'Opposition to Maxwell GJ Motion' indicates the correspondence concerns legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically regarding a Grand Jury motion. The email includes an embedded message file with the same subject.
EFTA00018658.pdf
An email chain from December 30, 2020, in which a DOJ Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Paris forwards a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) request from French authorities. The request relates to the investigation of an individual (name redacted) who was recently arrested in Paris. The sender notes they are already in contact with the recipients regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings.
EFTA00018005.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated September 22, 2021. The email discusses the review of evidence files including FBI files and FedEx records, mentions the discovery of 'Maxwell phone records,' and attaches a 'Household Manual' dated 2005 in preparation for an upcoming interview with the manual's source.
EFTA00016829.pdf
An email dated January 24, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to recipients labeled as 'TROOPERS'. The email requests the service of a subpoena to Expedia regarding travel records for 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell).
EFTA00016792.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) dated December 18, 2020, notifying the recipient (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel) that a CD containing a 'small corrected production of discovery' regarding Maxwell has been sent via FedEx.
EFTA00016392.pdf
An email dated June 29, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding a 'Corrected Maxwell Arrest Warrant'. The sender apologizes for a date error in a previous warrant and asks if Judge Smith can sign the attached corrected version.
EFTA00016313.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the SDNY to FBI agents dated June 12, 2020, requesting a follow-up call regarding the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. The email specifically seeks information on Maxwell's active financial accounts, credit cards, a connection to UMB Bank, the status of returns from a subpoena issued on September 25, 2019, and recent SAR/CTR (Suspicious Activity Report) checks.
EFTA00015971.pdf
This document is an email dated December 21, 2020, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'interlocutory appeals' and it contains an attachment titled 'Maxwell_Brief_re_Interlocutory_Appeals.pdf', indicating it relates to the legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00015835.pdf
An email dated August 22, 2021, discussing a draft letter to Judge 'AJN' (likely Alison J. Nathan) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints about VTC (Video Teleconference) access at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The sender notes a deadline of the following day and mentions coordinating with MDC legal counsel for review.
EFTA00015203.pdf
An email thread from June 30, 2020, involving Deputy US Attorney Audrey Strauss (SDNY). The correspondence concerns a '3:30 Q and A prep' session and includes an attachment titled 'Maxwell_possible_QA_v2.docx', suggesting preparations for a press event or legal proceeding regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (who was arrested shortly after, on July 2, 2020).
EFTA00015174.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated October 7, 2021. The email discusses a draft '3500 Cover Letter' (referring to Jencks Act material) and an attachment named 'Maxwell_Cover_Letter', likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The sender asks for review regarding language about a redacted individual.
EFTA00014713.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 23, 2021. It contains a forwarded message from journalist Aaron Katersky inquiring about the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Katersky notes for a 'preview piece' that Maxwell's 'most prominent public accuser' (name redacted) and another individual (name redacted) are not on the government's witness list and asks if there are any issues with this assessment.
EFTA00014709.pdf
An email sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York on November 23, 2021. The email transmits an attachment containing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The document is heavily redacted regarding personal identifiers.
EFTA00014506.pdf
A formal notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated July 18, 2017, announcing a change in the assigned case manager for docket 16-3945cv ([Redacted] v. Maxwell). The document lists Robert A. Katzmann as Chief Judge and references the underlying District Court case (15-cv-7433) presided over by Judge Sweet.
EFTA00014499.pdf
An email dated January 3, 2019, from Stan Pottinger of Edwards Pottinger LLC regarding a confidentiality order in a legal case against Maxwell presided over by Judge Sweet. The email forwards three PDF attachments identified as a Sealed Opinion, a Protective Order, and a notice of Case Manager Assignment, with the body text noting that 'These documents are public.'
EFTA00013300.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 29, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It discusses an order issued by Judge Nathan directing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to take specific actions by April 30, 2021. The emails coordinate the filing and transmission of this order to the Judge's chambers.
EFTA00013270.pdf
An internal email from January 8, 2021, between USANYS officials regarding 'Writeups'. The email includes an attachment related to Public Corruption updates for January 2021. The body text mentions a requested write-up on 'Maxwell' followed by redacted bullet points and the word 'obstruction'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Carolyn's career aspirations
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Epstein's sexual preferences and needs
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Instruction to undress
She told me to get undressed.
Small talk during massage
making small talk
Legal Review
Review of discovery materials
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Denial of motion
Denied Maxwell's motion for a new trial.
Motion for new trial
Moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity