MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-14 | Bail hearing | Judge Nathan held a bail hearing for Maxwell, heard oral arguments, and received statements from ... | District Court | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Legal proceeding | A lengthy bail hearing was held for Maxwell, at which bail was denied. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Bail hearing where Judge Nathan heard arguments and victim statements, ultimately ordering Maxwel... | District Court | View |
| 2020-07-13 | N/A | Arraignment (implied by 'next week's arraignment' in July 10 email) | Court | View |
| 2020-07-10 | N/A | Maxwell detention/bail hearing | Court (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal proceeding | Indictment S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) was filed with ministerial corrections. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal proceeding | Superseding Indictment S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) was filed. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-06 | N/A | Transport of Ghislaine Maxwell involves transfer of personal property (released to defense) and s... | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | Arrest | Maxwell was arrested. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Initial appearance call | Court (Virtual/Telephonic) | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Transfer to NY | From arrest location to New... | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Maxwell consented to remand | Unknown (Holding) | View |
| 2020-07-02 | Arrest | Maxwell was arrested and the original indictment was unsealed. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-30 | N/A | Transmission of subscriber information for phone numbers in contact with Maxwell via email attach... | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Indictment 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) was filed, charging Maxwell in six counts. | N/A | View |
| 2020-04-10 | N/A | Date associated with GM (Ghislaine Maxwell) prosecution memo attachment. | New York (implied context) | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Federal Grand Jury Subpoena issued (referenced in subject line: Fed GJ SBP 2020-01-23). | n/a | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Arrest | The arrest of Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | COVID-19 Pandemic | Global/General Context | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal discovery | Maxwell learned that the government had obtained a file by grand jury subpoena and had instituted... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Financial disclosure | Maxwell represented to Pretrial Services that she possessed around $3.5 million in assets. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Arrest | Arrest of Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Financial reporting | A report estimated the net worth of Maxwell and her spouse to be approximately $22.5 million. | N/A | View |
| 2019-11-13 | N/A | Maxwell's ISP activity detected for Facebook. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-10-30 | N/A | Subpoena issued for tolls on Maxwell's phone (referenced as past action in email). | N/A | View |
EFTA00030300.pdf
This document is an email dated March 7, 2020, sent by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email transmits a draft legal document titled 'Maxwell draft elements, order of proof', likely related to the prosecution strategy for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00029955.pdf
This document is an email dated March 30, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email discusses the dismissal of a lawsuit by Judge Koeltl and outlines a plan to request materials that were disclosed to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team during an upcoming discussion.
EFTA00029861.pdf
An email dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a team of colleagues. The email distributes a draft press release regarding the impending arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'), which the sender hopes will occur 'tomorrow or Thursday at the latest' (July 1st or 2nd, 2020). The document includes an attachment titled '2020-06-30,_GM,_press_release,_draft.docx'.
EFTA00029578.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 circulating a transcript from the 'US V Maxwell' trial. The emails contain an attachment named 'LBAAMAXH.pdf'. The sender and recipient identities are heavily redacted, though one recipient appears to be designated as a contractor.
EFTA00029464.pdf
This document is an email dated February 5, 2019, sent by a Government representative to the Chambers of Judge Sweet regarding the case 'v. Maxwell, et al., 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS)'. The email transmits an attachment related to an unsealing application and order, which the Government requests be filed under seal. The sender and recipient email addresses are redacted.
EFTA00029224.pdf
An internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated October 5, 2021. The email confirms that a thumb drive provided by defense counsel has been loaded with the latest discovery production for Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM') and asks colleagues to approve attached letters associated with the transfer.
EFTA00029194.pdf
An email dated October 1, 2021, with redacted sender and recipient. The subject and attachment refer to 'Maxwell Jury Exercise Takeaways,' suggesting legal strategy or jury consulting work related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The body text provides brief feedback on the attached document's introduction.
EFTA00029149.pdf
This document is an email header/metadata page dated October 26, 2020. The subject line indicates it transmits notes from a call that took place on the same day with the Georgia U.S. Attorney's Office (GA USAO) regarding 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The actual content is contained in an embedded .msg file not shown in the image. The sender and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00028845.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 concerning the US v. Maxwell case, specifically regarding requests from defense counsel to view highly confidential images and physical evidence. The emails detail logistics for reviewing evidence, including questions about image formats, metadata, the need for multiple laptops for review, inventory lists of physical items, and proposed dates and locations for the review at 500 Pearl Street.
EFTA00028381.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 6, 2019, involving Geoffrey Berman and other SDNY officials, coordinating the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. It confirms that Judge Moses signed a search warrant, Epstein was confirmed on a flight with two pilots (manifest provided by CBP), and was subsequently taken into custody upon arrival. The emails also mention agents performing 'approaches' regarding Maxwell and another individual on the same day.
EFTA00028278.pdf
This document is an email dated November 12, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a colleague. The sender requests the preparation of a binder for an upcoming court appearance on the following Monday, attaching various legal documents related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, including motions regarding 'MV-3' (Minor Victim 3), expert witnesses Dietz and Loftus, and responses to the defense.
EFTA00028138.pdf
This document is an email header dated January 5, 2021, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns activity in the criminal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), specifically regarding the setting or resetting of deadlines. The specific names of the senders and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00027871.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding an upcoming court update for Maxwell's conditions of confinement, due on April 6, 2021. The sender proposes a call to discuss the matter, particularly issues raised in defense counsel's letter, and attaches a PDF document titled 'MDC_Conditions_Letter_2-16_FINAL.pdf'. Redactions are present for sender and recipient names.
EFTA00027710.pdf
An email chain dated November 15, 2021, discussing the provision of a password for a hard drive intended for 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell). A legal assistant requests the password to provide the hard drive to her the following day, and a subsequent email attaches a letter containing the necessary password. The document references the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) in the attachment filename.
EFTA00027459.pdf
This document is a chain of three emails forwarded between June 28 and June 30, 2021. The subject concerns a 'Maxwell Suppression Opinion,' referencing the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20cr330). The final email includes attachments of a sealed opinion and order dated June 25, 2021. All participants in the email chain are redacted.
EFTA00027438.pdf
This document is a printout of an email header dated December 8, 2020. The subject is 'Maxwell Related Question,' likely pertaining to Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is identified as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The email originated from an Outlook/Exchange environment and included an embedded message attachment.
EFTA00027420.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York dated September 13, 2021. The email attaches a discovery letter related to the Maxwell case and discusses procedural etiquette regarding whose name should appear in the signature block of such letters.
EFTA00027359.pdf
An email dated April 1, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a 'Maxwell bail briefing' and includes four attachments related to Ghislaine Maxwell's legal proceedings, including bail motions, denial orders, and arraignment records spanning from July 2020 to April 2021.
EFTA00027261.pdf
An email sent on August 11, 2019, sharing a link to a New York Post article about Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruiters. The sender highlights a specific claim from the article that Ghislaine Maxwell is cooperating with authorities. The identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00027082.pdf
This document contains the metadata and header information for an email sent on February 22, 2021, with the subject 'Re: Maxwell Follow Up'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is visible in the BCC field. The document appears to be part of a larger production, marked with the identifier EFTA00027082.
EFTA00027075.pdf
This document contains the header information of an email sent by an FBI agent in New York on October 20, 2020. The subject line 'Maxwell discovery review' suggests it relates to the legal proceedings or investigation involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists metadata including message ID and an embedded message file, but heavily redact sender and recipient identities.
EFTA00026597.pdf
This document contains the metadata header for an email sent on February 22, 2021, with the subject 'RE: Maxwell Follow Up'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is identified as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The document includes a Message-ID indicative of Microsoft Outlook architecture.
EFTA00026596.pdf
This document is an email dated February 22, 2021, with the subject 'Opposition to Maxwell GJ Motion'. It was sent from a redacted sender to multiple redacted recipients, including 'USANYS' and 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' in Bcc, and includes an embedded message file named 'Opposition_to_Maxwell_GJ_Motion.msg'.
EFTA00026478.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding a telephone conference for the Maxwell case presided over by Judge Nathan. The email follows up on previous communication from Bobbi Sternheim and provides dial-in information for the defendant, referencing an attached court order.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Travel
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Setting up appointment times for so-called massages
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Mr. Epstein's status
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Maxwell Reply
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
Instruction to touch Epstein
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
General life updates and invitations
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Travel
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Reconsideration of the District Court's response
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Travel and an invitation to an island
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
Scheduling massage appointments
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Carolyn's career aspirations
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Epstein's sexual preferences and needs
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity