| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
This document is an email dated March 7, 2020, sent by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email transmits a draft legal document titled 'Maxwell draft elements, order of proof', likely related to the prosecution strategy for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is an email dated March 30, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email discusses the dismissal of a lawsuit by Judge Koeltl and outlines a plan to request materials that were disclosed to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team during an upcoming discussion.
An email dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a team of colleagues. The email distributes a draft press release regarding the impending arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'), which the sender hopes will occur 'tomorrow or Thursday at the latest' (July 1st or 2nd, 2020). The document includes an attachment titled '2020-06-30,_GM,_press_release,_draft.docx'.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 circulating a transcript from the 'US V Maxwell' trial. The emails contain an attachment named 'LBAAMAXH.pdf'. The sender and recipient identities are heavily redacted, though one recipient appears to be designated as a contractor.
This document is an email dated February 5, 2019, sent by a Government representative to the Chambers of Judge Sweet regarding the case 'v. Maxwell, et al., 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS)'. The email transmits an attachment related to an unsealing application and order, which the Government requests be filed under seal. The sender and recipient email addresses are redacted.
An internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated October 5, 2021. The email confirms that a thumb drive provided by defense counsel has been loaded with the latest discovery production for Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM') and asks colleagues to approve attached letters associated with the transfer.
An email dated October 1, 2021, with redacted sender and recipient. The subject and attachment refer to 'Maxwell Jury Exercise Takeaways,' suggesting legal strategy or jury consulting work related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The body text provides brief feedback on the attached document's introduction.
This document is an email header/metadata page dated October 26, 2020. The subject line indicates it transmits notes from a call that took place on the same day with the Georgia U.S. Attorney's Office (GA USAO) regarding 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The actual content is contained in an embedded .msg file not shown in the image. The sender and recipients are redacted.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 concerning the US v. Maxwell case, specifically regarding requests from defense counsel to view highly confidential images and physical evidence. The emails detail logistics for reviewing evidence, including questions about image formats, metadata, the need for multiple laptops for review, inventory lists of physical items, and proposed dates and locations for the review at 500 Pearl Street.
This document is an email chain from July 6, 2019, involving Geoffrey Berman and other SDNY officials, coordinating the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. It confirms that Judge Moses signed a search warrant, Epstein was confirmed on a flight with two pilots (manifest provided by CBP), and was subsequently taken into custody upon arrival. The emails also mention agents performing 'approaches' regarding Maxwell and another individual on the same day.
This document is an email dated November 12, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a colleague. The sender requests the preparation of a binder for an upcoming court appearance on the following Monday, attaching various legal documents related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, including motions regarding 'MV-3' (Minor Victim 3), expert witnesses Dietz and Loftus, and responses to the defense.
This document is an email header dated January 5, 2021, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns activity in the criminal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), specifically regarding the setting or resetting of deadlines. The specific names of the senders and recipients are redacted.
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding an upcoming court update for Maxwell's conditions of confinement, due on April 6, 2021. The sender proposes a call to discuss the matter, particularly issues raised in defense counsel's letter, and attaches a PDF document titled 'MDC_Conditions_Letter_2-16_FINAL.pdf'. Redactions are present for sender and recipient names.
An email chain dated November 15, 2021, discussing the provision of a password for a hard drive intended for 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell). A legal assistant requests the password to provide the hard drive to her the following day, and a subsequent email attaches a letter containing the necessary password. The document references the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) in the attachment filename.
This document is a chain of three emails forwarded between June 28 and June 30, 2021. The subject concerns a 'Maxwell Suppression Opinion,' referencing the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20cr330). The final email includes attachments of a sealed opinion and order dated June 25, 2021. All participants in the email chain are redacted.
This document is a printout of an email header dated December 8, 2020. The subject is 'Maxwell Related Question,' likely pertaining to Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is identified as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The email originated from an Outlook/Exchange environment and included an embedded message attachment.
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York dated September 13, 2021. The email attaches a discovery letter related to the Maxwell case and discusses procedural etiquette regarding whose name should appear in the signature block of such letters.
An email dated April 1, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a 'Maxwell bail briefing' and includes four attachments related to Ghislaine Maxwell's legal proceedings, including bail motions, denial orders, and arraignment records spanning from July 2020 to April 2021.
An email sent on August 11, 2019, sharing a link to a New York Post article about Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruiters. The sender highlights a specific claim from the article that Ghislaine Maxwell is cooperating with authorities. The identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
This document contains the metadata and header information for an email sent on February 22, 2021, with the subject 'Re: Maxwell Follow Up'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is visible in the BCC field. The document appears to be part of a larger production, marked with the identifier EFTA00027082.
This document contains the header information of an email sent by an FBI agent in New York on October 20, 2020. The subject line 'Maxwell discovery review' suggests it relates to the legal proceedings or investigation involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists metadata including message ID and an embedded message file, but heavily redact sender and recipient identities.
This document contains the metadata header for an email sent on February 22, 2021, with the subject 'RE: Maxwell Follow Up'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is identified as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The document includes a Message-ID indicative of Microsoft Outlook architecture.
This document is an email dated February 22, 2021, with the subject 'Opposition to Maxwell GJ Motion'. It was sent from a redacted sender to multiple redacted recipients, including 'USANYS' and 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' in Bcc, and includes an embedded message file named 'Opposition_to_Maxwell_GJ_Motion.msg'.
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding a telephone conference for the Maxwell case presided over by Judge Nathan. The email follows up on previous communication from Bobbi Sternheim and provides dial-in information for the defendant, referencing an attached court order.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
She told me to get undressed.
making small talk
Review of discovery materials
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity