Laura Menninger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-01 | N/A | Attorney Laura Menninger appeared for oral argument on MAXWELL's behalf. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-24 | N/A | Notice of Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell served via email. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2018-11-07 | N/A | Court hearing where Laura Menninger mentioned Dershowitz as a 'third party'. | Court | View |
| 2016-06-06 | N/A | Deadline for production of documents | Ft. Lauderdale, FL | View |
| 2016-04-21 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Pro Hac Vice motions and discovery disputes. | SDNY Courtroom | View |
| 2016-02-25 | Legal document transmission | Plaintiff's proposed Protective Order (Exhibit 4) was sent to Laura Menninger. | N/A | View |
| 0007-11-01 | N/A | Hearing where Maxwell's lawyer mentioned Dershowitz's name. | Court | View |
EFTA00030934.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated December 28, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The letter formally requests a Bill of Particulars to clarify the allegations in the Superseding Indictment, specifically asking for the real names of Minor Victims 1-3, precise dates and locations of alleged grooming and sexual abuse, details regarding travel in 1996 (NM and FL/NY), and specifics concerning perjury allegations from 2016 depositions.
EFTA00030912.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding various discovery disputes. Key issues include Maxwell's inability to access files on a CD at the MDC prison, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006, missing subscriber info in AT&T records, and clarification regarding missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers. The prosecution responds that the 'missing' Rodgers pages were produced in a separate file (SDNY_GM_00005650-5676) and confirms that a Daily Beast article referenced a document unsealed by a New Hampshire court, not leaked by the prosecution.
EFTA00030900.pdf
An email dated August 9, 2020, from attorney Jeff Pagliuca to redacted recipients and several cc'd attorneys (Menninger, Everdell, Cohen, Simmons). The email transmits an attached conferral letter regarding a protective order and discovery to the USA (likely US Attorney). The document originates from the Ghislaine Maxwell defense team (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman; Cohen Gresser).
EFTA00030861.pdf
This document is an email chain and legal correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. Defense attorney Christian Everdell lists eight specific issues, including the urgent need for a hard drive for Maxwell to review evidence in prison, missing subscriber info for AT&T documents, and specifically noting that the first 27 pages of flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers ('Rodgers000001-000027') were missing. The defense also inquires about a Daily Beast article referencing a cell-site simulator affidavit that they believe was not properly unsealed.
EFTA00030569.pdf
This document is a formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 22 specific discovery requests made on October 13, 2020. The government addresses requests for Epstein's diary, the 'Billionaires Playboy Club' manuscript, flight logs (implied in broader requests but not itemized), and the identities of minor victims, often denying immediate production based on Rule 16 restrictions or asserting that materials have already been produced. The letter also discusses the handling of potential 'Brady' and 'Giglio' materials, stating that impeachment evidence will be produced closer to trial.
EFTA00030306.pdf
This document is a Notice of Deposition filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 24, 2020. The plaintiff (name redacted) notifies the defendants that the oral deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for April 29, 2020, at the offices of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The document lists the legal counsel representing the plaintiff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
EFTA00030305.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 24, 2020, originating from Aneisha Christie and forwarded by Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The email serves as a formal service of a 'Notice of Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell' in the civil case '[Redacted] v. Indyke, et al.' The recipients include Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca, presumably opposing counsel.
EFTA00030092.pdf
A cover letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated March 12, 2021. The letter accompanies a discovery production of photographs and documents received from victims not referenced in the indictment (S1 20 Cr. 330), designated as confidential under a protective order.
EFTA00030084.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 concerning discovery and evidence review in the US v. Maxwell case. The correspondence primarily involves Laura Menninger (defense counsel) and an Assistant United States Attorney, discussing the availability and indexing of highly confidential physical evidence and images held by the FBI. Delays in providing answers and access to evidence are noted, with discussions around FBI team availability and the completeness of existing evidence inventories.
EFTA00030083.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production. The email confirms the production of materials related to victims not referenced in the specific indictment S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), pursuant to a court order from November 2020. The prosecutor requests an FTP link for transfer and notes that a CD copy will be sent to the MDC for Maxwell to review.
EFTA00030068.pdf
An email dated March 8, 2021, from attorney Laura Menninger to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and other defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell, Sternheim). The email serves as a cover letter for an attached PDF concerning a request to view evidence and highly confidential materials in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00030052.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 30, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Redactions'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys known to represent Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The sender information and specific email addresses are redacted.
EFTA00030021.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials (specifically nude images and videos seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices), the transport of physical evidence (including massage tables, plaster busts, and a stuffed dog) from the FBI Bronx warehouse to the courthouse, and the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street. The prosecution refuses to transport bulky items or obscene digital material freely, requiring the defense to view some items at the warehouse or on specific laptops under supervision.
EFTA00029942.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Attorney Christian Everdell raises seven specific discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to access files on disks via the prison computer, missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and significant metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Epstein's devices show modification dates (July 2020) well after his death and device seizure. The email specifically requests metadata overlays to correct these issues and inquires about a gap in document production numbers.
EFTA00029600.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email, dated September 15, 2021, transmits a government letter regarding 'Flatley' and a document labeled '3503-001', likely referring to Jencks Act material (witness statements).
EFTA00029574.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 involving the transmission of Defense Rule 16 Disclosure documents from Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The attachments include certifications from AT&T and FedEx, FedEx invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The thread shows internal USANYS staff coordinating to save these files to a shared drive.
EFTA00029535.pdf
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
EFTA00029423.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca), likely regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence concerns proposed redactions for filings related to 'Witness-3' and includes an attachment referencing a letter to Judge Nathan. Christian Everdell requests a quick phone call with the prosecutor during the exchange.
EFTA00029301.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (specifically a letter regarding legal mail) to prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and her co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email was then forwarded internally within the USANYS office.
EFTA00029236.pdf
This document is an email dated April 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Sternheim is sending a courtesy copy of an ECF filing, specifically a reply letter concerning the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center), to redacted recipients and co-counsel including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00029189.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 21, 2021, regarding the pretrial schedule for Ghislaine Maxwell (referenced as 'GM' in the attachment filename). Laura Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. (defense counsel) contacts the recipients to coordinate a 'joint letter' and scheduling position statement. The recipient replies with a draft of the letter attached, noting it is '[sent_to_defense]'.
EFTA00029180.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Attorney Nicole Simmons submits Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus to Judge Nathan's chambers. The documents were submitted under temporary seal to allow for government redaction proposals.
EFTA00029162.pdf
This document is an email dated August 18, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to other defense counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to transmit a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell. The attachment references 'Letter_re_VTCs', likely concerning Video Teleconferences for the trial proceedings.
EFTA00028845.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 concerning the US v. Maxwell case, specifically regarding requests from defense counsel to view highly confidential images and physical evidence. The emails detail logistics for reviewing evidence, including questions about image formats, metadata, the need for multiple laptops for review, inventory lists of physical items, and proposed dates and locations for the review at 500 Pearl Street.
EFTA00028733.pdf
A discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated May 20, 2021. The production includes 'Interlochen records' and native 'carved' image files from various electronic devices (identified by codes such as NYC024321) that were previously produced in PDF format. The letter and materials are marked confidential under a Protective Order.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx view on April 12; raising issues about specific items (boxes, framed photo) that need to be moved to 500 Pearl; questioning 'missing items' and electronic surveillance formats.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussing logistics for Bronx view. Raising issues about 'Highly Confidential' vs 'bulky' items, specific Florida evidence items, and electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Discussing logistics for Bronx warehouse view and 500 Pearl view. Raising issues about 'highly confidential' vs 'bulky' items, photography rights, and electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Raising issues about spreadsheets: items marked for Bronx that need to be at 500 Pearl (highly confidential but not bulky); questions about photographing bulky photos; questions about electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Addressing logistics: FBI inspections at Bronx warehouse, designation of 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photos, witness statements, use of proffer rooms at 500 Pearl, and bringing 2,100 electronic images to 500 Pearl.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx warehouse visit; 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photo rules; witness statements.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to government proposal; demanding access to photograph items at Bronx warehouse; refusing massage tables.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications regarding photography of items at Bronx warehouse and protocols for electronic media.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications. Requesting access to inspect 'excluded' items at Bronx warehouse. Discussing equipment for playing media and space requirements.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to defense requests; refusing to transport all physical evidence; discussing 'bulky' items like massage tables and plaster busts.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Response regarding logistics for physical evidence review. Refusing to move massage tables/bulky items to Pearl St. Explaining image categories.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, cash, and bulky items (plaster busts, stuffed dog) to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for tapes.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response to defense requests. Refusing to move massage tables, electronic devices that can't be turned on, and bulky items like plaster busts/stuffed dog to 500 Pearl. Agreeing to move 15-20 boxes of physical evidence.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to defense requests; refusing to move all physical evidence to 500 Pearl; agreeing to exclude massage tables and cash from transport; discussing 2,100 highly confidential images.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, framed pictures, and plaster busts to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for recordings.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating the proposal is inadequate for defense. demanding laptops be allowed, all physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl (except massage tables), and questioning why 2,100 'highly confidential' images were not shared earlier.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Complaint that current proposal prevents meaningful defense; requesting all physical evidence be moved to 500 Pearl.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Detailed response regarding deficiencies in prosecution's proposal for evidence review. Requests transport of evidence to 500 Pearl St, permission for laptops, and segregation of 'highly confidential' items.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Stating the Gov proposal is inadequate. Demanding laptops/devices be allowed, and questioning why 2,100 highly confidential images were not previously shared.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Rejecting proposal as inadequate; insisting on laptops/devices during review; demanding physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl; questioning missing highly confidential images.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating previous proposal was inadequate; demanding physical evidence be moved to 500 Pearl; requesting laptops/devices be allowed; asking about 2,100+7 highly confidential images not previously shared.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Detailed explanation of 'Highly Confidential' nude images (2,100 from devices, 3,400 from discs, 7 hard copies). Explaining constraints on reviewing obscene material. Detailing rules for Bronx warehouse review.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Providing spreadsheets of physical evidence. Detailing 2,100 electronic images seized from Epstein's devices (highly confidential/nude), 3,400 images from discs, and 7 hard copy nude images.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity