NEW YORK CITY
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000225.tif
This document outlines the conviction and sentencing of a petitioner for their role in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse network between approximately 1994 and 2004. The petitioner was found guilty of conspiring to transport minors for sexual activity, transporting minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking of a minor, receiving a 240-month prison sentence. The document details the pattern of abuse involving identifying vulnerable girls, isolating them, and paying them for sexualized massages, which took place at Epstein's residences in Palm Beach, Florida, and New York City.
DOJ-OGR-00000157.tif
This document provides an overview of the initial investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, starting with a 2005 complaint to the Palm Beach Police Department. It details how the local investigation led to a state grand jury indictment in 2006, and subsequently, dissatisfaction with state handling prompted a referral to the FBI. An Assistant U.S. Attorney, with knowledge from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, then worked with FBI agents to build a federal case, discovering more victims and drafting a 60-count indictment by May 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00000049.tif
This document, likely a legal petition or brief, discusses the reasons for granting a petition filed by 'Maxwell' after an en banc rehearing was denied. It focuses on a circuit split regarding the binding nature of plea agreements made by a U.S. Attorney's office in one district on other U.S. Attorney's offices. The document cites Santobello v. New York as a precedent suggesting that such promises should be binding across different prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00033232.tif
This document details various accommodations and financial assistance provided by Jeffrey (Epstein) to his employees and their family members. Examples include tuition payments for children, medical support, and flexible work arrangements, illustrating his alleged generosity and support for his staff's well-being and educational pursuits.
DOJ-OGR-00033229.tif
This document details Jeffrey's philanthropic activities, highlighting his significant contributions to educational and civic organizations. He supported scholars at risk globally, sponsored awards for women economists, and funded Rwandan students' education in the US. Jeffrey also donated to various wellness and civic organizations in New York City and the Virgin Islands, including the Robin Hood Foundation and Antilles School.
DOJ-OGR-00033227.tif
This document, page 7 of a larger report (likely a defense submission), details Ghislaine Maxwell's arrival in NYC in 1991 following her father's death and her subsequent relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. It characterizes Epstein as a supportive figure who helped her through depression with intellectual engagement and comedy clubs, and arranged a business loan which she repaid. The text notes their romantic relationship ended amicably around 2000 due to his work demands, comparing the breakup to one with 'Eva', and concludes with a positive character statement written by Maxwell about Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00033225.tif
This document excerpt describes aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's character and relationships through the recollections of a friend, Eisenstein, and details about his long-term intimate relationship with Eva Andersson. It highlights his playful nature in high school, his enduring friendship with Eisenstein, and his financial support and involvement in Eva Andersson's medical education.
DOJ-OGR-00033224.tif
This document, titled 'Personal Characteristics', compiles testimonials from three friends of Jeffrey (Kathleen Lindman, Terry B. Kafka, and Warren Eisenstein) who describe his loyalty, generosity, and caring nature. The friends provide specific examples of Jeffrey's support, including funding a friend's son's education, offering business and academic advice, and sharing experiences from their youth like driving taxicabs.
DOJ-OGR-00033223.tif
This document describes Jeffrey's professional life as a family office advisor for the ultra-wealthy, his personal background including his relationships with Eva Andersson and Ghislaine Maxwell, and his multiple residences. It also details his 2005 trip with former President Bill Clinton to Africa for an AIDS Initiative and illustrates his role as an advisor with a hypothetical scenario involving a pre-nuptial agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00018391.jpg
This document is a transcript of court testimony from a witness named Kate. She describes Maxwell's role as managing properties for Jeffrey and ensuring they met his standards. Kate testifies that Maxwell claimed to own houses in London and New York City, with the latter being a gift from Jeffrey, and also claimed to be friends with prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Donald Trump.
DOJ-OGR-00017881.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Paul Kane by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. Mr. Kane identifies himself as the director of finance for the Professional Children's School in New York City and provides a brief description of the school's history and purpose.
DOJ-OGR-00014911.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript, dated January 15, 2025, from a case identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features a Q&A session, likely a deposition or testimony, where an individual (the Answerer) discusses the concept of 'grooming' in relation to child sexual abuse, its historical presence in scientific literature since the 1980s, and the foundation of their expert opinions on the subject. The discussion emphasizes grooming as a process involving increasing dependency and coercion, rather than an isolated event.
DOJ-OGR-00001494.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (likely a detention memo) from the Government in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It argues the defendant is a flight risk due to massive financial resources, citing over 15 bank accounts with balances reaching $20 million, a $15 million NYC property sale in 2016, and recent large transfers in 2019. A footnote explicitly links the defendant to Jeffrey Epstein, noting that over $20 million was transferred from Epstein's accounts to hers between 2007 and 2011.
DOJ-OGR-00001310.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 5, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The notice indicates that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted by the United States (Appellee) did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules, though the specific reason is not checked in the visible list. The document lists Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe as court officials.
DOJ-OGR-00001118.jpg
This court filing details Ghislaine Maxwell's financial history from 2015 to 2020, citing a 'Macalvins report.' It documents her 2015 net worth ($20.2M), the sale of an NYC apartment for $15M, her 2016 marriage, and the subsequent transfer of assets into a trust controlled by her spouse. Footnotes clarify discrepancies between her self-reported assets during a Pretrial Services interview ($3.8M) and her actual financial standing, attributing the difference to lack of access to records while detained.
DOJ-OGR-00001105.jpg
This legal document outlines a series of proposed conditions for the pretrial release of Ms. Maxwell. The conditions include home confinement in New York City with GPS monitoring, supervision by Pretrial Services, surrender of travel documents, and the presence of 24/7 private security guards paid for by Ms. Maxwell. The document argues that these measures, supported by legal precedent from the Second Circuit, are sufficient to ensure she will not flee and will appear in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001094.jpg
This legal document, dated April 1, 2021, addresses the issue of attorney-client access for detainees at a federal facility (MDC). It argues that current measures, such as video and phone conferences, are sufficient for defendants like Ms. Maxwell to prepare their defense, especially given the ongoing pandemic in New York City. The court orders the government to work with the defense to ensure adequate communication, noting that the MDC is also planning to resume in-person visits in the near future.
DOJ-OGR-00000838.jpg
This is a Docketing Notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770), dated March 29, 2021. It notifies counsel that the appeal has been docketed and provides instructions regarding the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, which must be returned within 14 days. The document references the lower court case (1:20-cr-330-1) presided over by Judge Nathan in the SDNY.
DOJ-OGR-00000807.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6 million Paris residence, ownership of private jets used for frequent international travel, and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals that a recent search of his New York City home uncovered an expired Austrian passport with his photo but another name, listing a residence in Saudi Arabia, further heightening concerns about his potential to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00000720.jpg
This document is page 82 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a victim impact statement where an unnamed woman describes the psychological devastation of realizing she was one of many young girls in a 'rotation' performing for Epstein for money. She details her background as a vulnerable 16-year-old and contrasts her naivety with Epstein's ability to manipulate powerful figures in the legal and scientific communities.
DOJ-OGR-00000703.jpg
This document is a victim impact statement from 'Jane Doe 7' filed on September 3, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The victim describes being unknowingly recruited by an agent and subsequently sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein at his New York City mansion. She details the severe psychological aftermath, including becoming a recluse, suffering from shame and guilt, and struggling with suicidal thoughts.
DOJ-OGR-00000678.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It contains a victim impact statement from an unnamed former model who describes being sexually assaulted by Epstein, receiving money immediately after the act, and subsequently suffering from depression and leaving the modeling industry. The transcript concludes with Mr. Edwards introducing another victim, Jane Doe No. 4, who begins her statement.
DOJ-OGR-00000677.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where victims are giving statements. An unidentified speaker discusses the societal problem of victim-blaming. Another victim, Jane Doe No. 3, begins her testimony, recounting how she moved to New York City 15 years prior to pursue modeling and was subsequently introduced to Mr. Epstein by a woman who portrayed him as someone who could help her career.
DOJ-OGR-00000608.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript (filed July 26, 2019) detailing a judge's rationale for denying bail to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights testimony from victims Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild regarding their safety, the seriousness of sex trafficking charges involving minors as young as 14, and evidence of witness intimidation. It also details Epstein's flight risk, citing his private planes, foreign residence in Paris, and items seized from his NYC mansion, including $70,000 cash, diamonds, and a fake Austrian passport.
DOJ-OGR-00000536.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding transcript dated July 24, 2019, discussing a case involving federal interest and an indictment against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Weinberg, identified as Deputy Attorney General, explains his approval in May or June 2008 for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the federal government's involvement, including urging Florida to bring additional charges against Mr. Epstein. The discussion also touches upon the roles of Mr. Sloman and Mr. Filip within the Department of Justice and the scope of the U.S. Attorney's Office in New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity