This legal document, filed by the Government, outlines the defendant's significant and complex financial resources, arguing they pose a flight risk. It details numerous large transactions, including a $15 million property sale in 2016, multi-hundred-thousand-dollar transfers in 2019, and historical transfers of over $20 million involving accounts associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The Government contends that these activities make the defendant's total financial picture opaque and difficult to determine.
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 1, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The court clerk notified the appellant that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell was rejected because the PDF file was not text-searchable, violating Local Rules 25.1 and 25.2. The document lists Judge Nathan as the District Court judge and references the underlying SDNY docket number 1:20-cr-330-1.
This document is a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on March 30, 2021, on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that the filing does not comply with federal and local court rules. The notice lists numerous specific reasons for the defect, ranging from missing acknowledgments and supporting papers to formatting issues like incorrect pagination and font.
This is a formal court notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated March 29, 2021. It confirms that the 'Record on Appeal - Electronic Index' has been filed in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket #: 21-770), originating from the SDNY under Judge Nathan.
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated January 12, 2021, for the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 21-58). The document confirms that the "Record on Appeal - Electronic Index" has been officially filed with the court. The notice is issued under the authority of Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, discussing the scheduling of a trial's jury deliberation. An unnamed speaker (likely the judge) explains the necessity of the current schedule, citing a significant increase in COVID-19 omicron variant cases in New York City, which poses a risk to trial completion and could lead to a mistrial. Mr. Pagliuca, addressing 'Your Honor,' expresses concern about jurors deliberating through the weekend and New Year's, arguing against retracting a prior commitment from the Court to give them those days off, suggesting deliberation only during the workweek.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. The presiding judge explains the decision to extend jury deliberations by one hour each day due to a significant spike in COVID-19 cases (omicron variant) in New York City, which poses a risk of disrupting the trial. A participant, Mr. Everdell, briefly acknowledges the judge's statement.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer. The questioning centers on a document from a victims' compensation program in which Farmer identified New York City and New Mexico as locations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion clarifies the specific entries made by the witness on the form.
This document is a page from the Curriculum Vitae of Stephen Gillers, likely submitted as an exhibit in a court case (possibly as an expert witness). It details his legal and public service activities between 1979 and 1992, including roles with the ABA, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, and the David Dinkins Mayoral Transition Search Committee. It also lists his bar memberships in New York and various federal courts. The document bears stamps from multiple court filings, including a 2012 criminal case and a 2022 civil case (likely Guiffre v. Maxwell), and a DOJ production number.
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the timeline following Jeffrey Epstein's August 2019 suicide, including the dismissal of his indictment in SDNY and the conclusion of CVRA litigation in Florida where the court found the government had not litigated in bad faith but had violated the CVRA. It summarizes the appellate history of 'Jane Doe 1' seeking a writ of mandamus in the 11th Circuit regarding the non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Additionally, it marks the initiation of the OPR investigation into DOJ attorney misconduct, triggered by a request from Senator Ben Sasse following the Miami Herald's November 2018 reporting.
A page containing three handwritten phone message slips addressed to 'Jeffrey' dated January 10, 2005. The callers are identified as Jean-Luc, Darren, and Mr. Copperfield, with specific New York area code phone numbers recorded for Jean-Luc and Mr. Copperfield. The document includes Department of Justice processing marks and a date stamp from 2019.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details surveillance and investigation activities in April 2005 regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1-05-000368). Officers documented voicemails from Haley Robson arranging transport for a female to Epstein's house, conducted trash pulls at 358 El Brillo revealing flight logs (N908JE) and notes with names of associates like Sarah Kellen and potential victims, and investigated a minor student named Zachary Brian at Summit Christian School. The report also documents subpoena attempts for phone records and coordination with the FBI (SA Mighdoll).
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. A judge explains the decision to modify the jury deliberation schedule due to a significant spike in COVID-19 (omicron variant) cases in New York City, aiming to prevent a mistrial. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the change, arguing that the court should honor its initial commitment to the jury regarding time off for the weekend and New Year's.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. A judge explains the decision to extend daily jury deliberations by one hour due to a significant spike in COVID-19 cases from the omicron variant in New York City. The judge's concern is that jurors or trial participants might need to quarantine, which would risk the completion of the trial.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Visoski. Visoski describes visiting Mr. Epstein's office at Madison Avenue and 51st Street in Manhattan approximately once a week between 1994 and 2004. The primary purpose of these visits was to submit expense reports and receive reimbursement checks, though the witness also spoke with other employees about travel plans and provided a physical description of the small office.
This document is page 60 of a court transcript (Opening Statement by Ms. Sternheim) filed on August 10, 2022, likely from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that unlike the 9/11 fund, the Epstein compensation fund claims were based on 'unreliable' memories. The text focuses on an accuser named 'Jane,' describing Epstein as a 'benefactor' who paid for her professional schooling, vocal lessons, and a Wall Street apartment where she lived with her family.
This is a 'Notice of Case Manager Change' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 27, 2021, regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Case 21-58cr). The document lists Debra Ann Livingston as Chief Judge and Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe as Clerk of Court, and references the lower court proceedings in the SDNY under Judge Nathan.
This legal document details the procedural history of the criminal case against Schulte, a former CIA employee. It covers his August 2017 arrest for leaking national defense information, subsequent indictments, and a trial in early 2020 which resulted in a guilty verdict on two counts and a mistrial on eight others. The document concludes by noting that the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City immediately after the trial caused a suspension of court proceedings.
This legal document is an "Opinion & Order" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated March 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Joshua Adam Schulte. The court denies a motion by Schulte, a former CIA employee accused of leaking information to Wikileaks, to dismiss a superseding indictment. Schulte argued the grand jury was unconstitutional due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the court rejected this claim, allowing the prosecution to proceed towards a second trial.
This document is a scanned image of a handwritten note containing the name 'Gora Dowsen' and a phone number (917 572 9796). The document bears Department of Justice markings indicating it is part of a public records request processed in 2017.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from April 20, 2006, details a victim's account of being sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein on multiple occasions under the guise of massages, for which she was paid $200 each time. The report also documents the ongoing investigation, including the results of subpoenas to telecom companies and Western Union, which confirmed a wire transfer from Epstein to the victim and identified phone numbers belonging to Epstein's associates, Janusz Banasiak and Christina Venero.
This document is a narrative account from a legal filing, describing the author's interaction with a woman named Maria, an artist. It details Maria's history with Epstein and Maxwell, explaining how she was introduced to Epstein through New York socialite Eileen Guggenheim and lawyer Bert Fields. The text highlights Maria's fear of Epstein, her distrust following an experience with Vanity Fair, and how Epstein ultimately hired her for a job at his New York City mansion.
This document is the Preliminary Statement of a legal filing (Document 171) dated March 23, 2021, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's third application for bail. It outlines a massive proposed bail package including $28.5 million in bonds, $9.5 million in property, renunciation of foreign citizenship, and home confinement in NYC. The filing argues these strict conditions are sufficient to assure her appearance at trial.
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Jane by Ms. Moe, filed on August 10, 2022. Jane testifies that she moved from New York City to Los Angeles in October 1999 for an acting job. She confirms that after her move, she remained in contact with Epstein and Maxwell until late 2002 and continued to travel with Epstein on his private jet.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness identified as 'Jane.' Jane discusses the psychological impact of her past trauma, stating it ruined her self-worth and ability to trust. She testifies that she moved from Palm Beach to New York City at age 17 and that Jeffrey Epstein paid for her tuition at the Professional Children's School for her senior year of high school.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity