court
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Judicial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Judicial oversight |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brune & Richard lawyers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Parse
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell's lawyers
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant (Maxwell)
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Schulte
|
Defendant judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Sentencing Commission
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror judicial authority |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Victims asked the court to reject a plea agreement due to CVRA violations. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Amicus NACDL urges the Court to grant a petition to resolve a conflict among circuits regarding g... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court asked Belohlavek about juvenile victim's parents/guardian agreement with plea. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court allowed Jane Doe #2 to join the action. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court declines to issue writ of mandamus. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Anonymous statement to the court opposing bond for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed sentencing: 30 months total, divided into 12 months and 6 months consecutive in county j... | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court declines Maxwell's motion to strike surplusage at this juncture. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moves to strike surplusage from the S1 superseding indictment, specifically allegations r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court favors severance, deciding to try perjury counts separately for fair and expeditious resolu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court considers burden of separate trials for perjury and Mann Act counts. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Resolution of the Defendant's motion or a hearing. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury sent a note regarding Count Four and transportation of Jane. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court rejected the defendant's request for additional instructions regarding Count Two. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (50-question survey) | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing where an attorney is arguing regarding juror selection strategy and potential ineff... | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00018171.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated July 11, 2019. The sender transmits an attachment titled 'Epstein_bail_memo_and_attachments.pdf' regarding a defendant bail submission. The sender notes they are rushing back to court to swear out a 'latest warrant' at 12:45.
EFTA00015630.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 8-9, 2019, between attorney Raymond L. Colon and a redacted individual (likely a prosecutor or court official). The discussion centers on scheduling a plea hearing at the Magistrate's Court in room 5A for July 10, 2019, and exchanging a plea agreement. Notably, on July 8, Colon congratulates the recipient on a 'Job well done' regarding 'the Epstein case,' coinciding with Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
EFTA00014542.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 29, 2019, discussing scheduling a call regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The emails mention a proposed call for Wednesday morning at 9 am and discuss the 'return of property,' directing one party to contact a female Special Agent or speak with someone in court on Wednesday. The identities of the senders, recipients, and the agent are redacted.
EFTA00014153.pdf
This document is an email chain between employees of the USAFLS (likely US Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) dated November 20, 2008. The correspondence concerns a 'Response to Florida Bar Complaint,' indicating a legal challenge against one of the attorneys. The sender requests a colleague to PDF the document and send it to a personal Hotmail account, notes that a judge continued a hearing, and ends with a personal 'I luv u,' suggesting a close relationship between the parties.
EFTA00003463.pdf
A photograph showing a man relaxing on a leather sofa with yellow and brown pillows in a covered outdoor patio area. The background features a large paved courtyard with a central fountain, surrounded by a pink stucco building with arched doorways, white columns, and a tiled roof, characteristic of hacienda-style architecture. The alphanumeric code EFTA00003463 appears in the bottom right corner.
EFTA00003344.pdf
A photograph showing Bill Clinton (identified visually) walking away from the camera on a paved outdoor path. He is accompanied by an unidentified woman in a grey plaid suit and a partially visible man in a dark suit. The setting appears to be a courtyard or garden area adjacent to a brick building. The image is stamped with the identifier EFTA00003344.
EFTA00002648.pdf
This document is a photograph of an architectural floor plan and site layout for a large property, labeled 'MAIN HOUSE, MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN'. It features topographic elevation lines and various room labels such as 'Entrance Garden', 'Courtyard', 'Port-Cochere', 'Kitchen', and 'Living Room'. There are numerous handwritten notes in blue and black ink discussing logistical details like 'Staff / Laundry?', 'Service road', 'Security', 'Lighting', and 'Guests', suggesting a review or design phase of the construction.
EFTA00002646.pdf
This document is an architectural blueprint or floor plan for a property, likely part of the Epstein estate given the context (EFTA bates stamp). It details the layout of a level at 'LEV + 120 FT', featuring an office, library, staircase, water gardens (with lotus), garden fountains, loggia, dining area, kitchen, sound/music room, and a courtyard. Handwritten notes and dimensions are annotated over the printed plan.
DOJ-OGR-00033272.tif
This document is an 'IMPORTANT MESSAGE' slip, likely a phone message, indicating that 'Dolich Wuss' is 'OVER IN COURT'. The message instructs 'Haa' to 'report this to judge', with 'PLEASE CALL' and 'RUSH' marked, suggesting urgency. The date is partially obscured, but a time of 4:2? A.M. or P.M. is visible.
DOJ-OGR-00023273.tif
This document details events surrounding Epstein's state plea, focusing on victim notification failures and the actions of various legal and investigative parties. It highlights Villafaña's efforts to identify victims and contact their attorneys, and statements from victims (Wild, Jane Doe #2) expressing their lack of awareness regarding the plea's implications for their cases. The document also notes discrepancies in the State Attorney's Office's communication about the case closure and Epstein's sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00017813.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the redirect examination of a witness named Jane, who is questioned about a past application to the Professional Children's School and her understanding of the difference between acting and testifying in court. Jane asserts that testifying in court is real and truthful, unlike acting on television.
DOJ-OGR-00008530.jpg
This document contains Jury Instruction No. 55 from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 17, 2021. The instruction advises the jury regarding 'Preparation of Witnesses,' clarifying that it is not improper for witnesses to meet with lawyers (Government, defense, or personal) prior to testifying to review subjects and exhibits. The judge instructs that while the jury may consider this preparation when evaluating credibility, the weight given to it is within their discretion.
DOJ-OGR-00001296.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order filed on February 8, 2021, regarding United States v. Robertson (Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV). The court is reconsidering and granting Mr. Robertson's release to the La Pasada Halfway House due to trial delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the inability to hold in-person attorney-client meetings at the Albuquerque courthouse. The court cites 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and strict conditions as the basis for assuring community safety and the defendant's appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00000783.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from July 16-23, 2019, detailing the proceedings of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19-2221). It documents the denial of Epstein's bail during a hearing on July 18, 2019, presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, attended by FBI and NYPD representatives. Following the remand order, Epstein's defense team filed a Notice of Appeal on July 22, 2019, along with a sealed document placed in the vault.
DOJ-OGR-00000701.jpg
This document is page 63 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a victim impact statement delivered in court following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker describes the lasting trauma of Epstein's abuse, expresses anger at the prison system for allowing Epstein to commit suicide (thereby denying victims their day in court), and concludes by reclaiming their identity as a survivor rather than a victim.
DOJ-OGR-00000650.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in which a representative for the government addresses the court regarding the victims in the case. The speaker confirms that efforts were made to notify all known victims of the proceeding, in compliance with the Crimes Victims' Rights Act, and notes that both the U.S. Attorney's office and the FBI have been in contact with them. The government also commits to continuing to provide services to the victims even if the indictment is dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00000649.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A representative for the government is addressing the court, stating that despite the dismissal of the indictment, related investigations and the possibility of civil asset forfeiture will continue. The speaker also confirms that defense counsel is complying with a protective order to return discovery materials and reaffirms the government's commitment to the victims of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00020562.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering proceedings from December 18 to December 20, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial, various letters exchanged regarding jury charges and closing argument logistics, and judicial orders concerning the public release of exhibits and presentation slides. The document highlights the court's instruction to ensure public access to materials while maintaining necessary redactions for witness anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00020558.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates December 5-9, 2021. It details daily minute entries for the ongoing jury trial, filings regarding witness testimony (specifically 'Witness-3' and alleged sexual activity), and administrative orders including juror reimbursement. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00020500.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from August 25, 2020, to October 6, 2020. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests regarding victim identities, prison conditions, and modifications to a protective order. The docket also records Maxwell's subsequent appeal, the sealing of various documents, and the appearance of new defense counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020457.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 5 to December 9, 2021. It details daily jury trial proceedings, legal correspondence regarding evidence and witness testimony (specifically regarding 'Witness-3' and alleged sexual activity), and administrative orders such as juror reimbursement. The document lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00018424.jpg
This document is page 87 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on a television appearance Kate made with approximately six other women to discuss allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney questions the nature of their interaction, suggesting they appeared as a 'sisterhood' or were affectionate, while Kate clarifies she had only met the other women the day prior at a court appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00016169.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of an opening statement delivered by Ms. Sternheim on August 10, 2022, in a case against Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Sternheim argues that the government is mischaracterizing lawful conduct as 'grooming' and highlights that witnesses testifying for the government have received substantial payments from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, suggesting a potential motive for their testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00002011.jpg
This document is page 39 of a defense filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government only pursued Maxwell as an 'afterthought' following Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody, noting that subpoenas for her financial records were not issued until August 16, 2019 (six days after his death). The text contends there is a lack of documentary corroboration for the charges, characterizing the case as relying on 25-year-old witness testimony, and urges the court to grant bail.
DOJ-OGR-00022062.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Analisa Torres for the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, in the case of United States v. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. Citing the COVID-19 pandemic and a prior order from the Chief Judge, the document postpones the trial from its scheduled date of June 22, 2020, to January 4, 2021. It also schedules a status conference for the parties on September 9, 2020.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity