| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Judicial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Judicial oversight |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brune & Richard lawyers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Parse
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell's lawyers
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant (Maxwell)
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Schulte
|
Defendant judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Sentencing Commission
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror judicial authority |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Victims asked the court to reject a plea agreement due to CVRA violations. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Amicus NACDL urges the Court to grant a petition to resolve a conflict among circuits regarding g... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court asked Belohlavek about juvenile victim's parents/guardian agreement with plea. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court allowed Jane Doe #2 to join the action. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court declines to issue writ of mandamus. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Anonymous statement to the court opposing bond for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed sentencing: 30 months total, divided into 12 months and 6 months consecutive in county j... | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court declines Maxwell's motion to strike surplusage at this juncture. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moves to strike surplusage from the S1 superseding indictment, specifically allegations r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court favors severance, deciding to try perjury counts separately for fair and expeditious resolu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court considers burden of separate trials for perjury and Mann Act counts. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Resolution of the Defendant's motion or a hearing. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury sent a note regarding Count Four and transportation of Jane. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court rejected the defendant's request for additional instructions regarding Count Two. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (50-question survey) | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing where an attorney is arguing regarding juror selection strategy and potential ineff... | Courtroom | View |
This document is an email from Associate Warden Charisma Edge to Lamine N'Diaye dated August 1, 2019, providing a synopsis of Jeffrey Epstein's recent activities and psychological status. It details that Epstein was taken off 'psych ops' on July 30, but a Suicide Risk Assessment (SRA) was conducted on August 1 after he returned from court with a note indicating suicidal tendencies; the assessment found him to be psychologically stable.
This email, dated July 8, 2019, from Lamine N'Diaye provides an update on inmate Jeffrey Epstein (Reg. 76318-054) following his arrival at MCC New York on July 6, 2019. Epstein was placed in a special housing unit pending evaluation and was arraigned in court on the day of the email. The document outlines the procedure for his psychological evaluation, including a suicide risk assessment, and the conditions under which he would be placed on PSYCHOLOGICAL OBSERVATION or Suicide Watch.
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed speaker, likely the judge, details the logistical plan for the final phase of jury selection, explaining how 58 remaining jurors will be questioned for bias via a live feed and how counsel will then exercise peremptory strikes on a smaller pool of 40 jurors.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book (possibly by Alan Dershowitz) containing a transcript of court testimony regarding the Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody dispute. Dershowitz testifies that he was not trying to be Allen's criminal lawyer but that Farrow had asked him to intervene, and he expresses his belief that Allen received terrible legal advice which escalated the situation. The text includes Dershowitz's commentary on the testimony, noting that the court would not allow him to expand on a perceived 'hidden agenda' during the proceedings.
This document page is a legal disclaimer and copyright notice from a 2018 Goldman Sachs document, specifically addressing regulatory compliance in the United Kingdom under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. It lists GSI's London address and its regulators (Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority). The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation.
This document is a legal disclaimer page (page 14) from a Goldman Sachs presentation or report, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026922, indicating it was part of a US Congressional investigation. It details regulatory compliance, licensing exemptions, and restrictions for distributing financial materials in various jurisdictions including Australia, Brazil, Chile, Dubai, Israel, Singapore, and the UAE. It specifically notes that Goldman Sachs entities are not licensed to provide investment advice in Israel and outlines 'wholesale client' restrictions in Australia.
This document is a standard legal disclaimer and privacy notice page from Goldman Sachs, dated 2018. It outlines regulatory compliance and investment warnings for Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom, alongside a data privacy statement regarding the EU. The document bears a Bates stamp indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee investigation (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026908).
This document is a disclaimer and endnote page from a Goldman Sachs Investment Strategy Group presentation or report, produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026906). It lists sources and citations from 2018, details the various global entities of Goldman Sachs providing services, and includes standard legal warnings regarding investment risks, options, and derivatives. While the document is part of a larger production likely related to financial oversight, this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or specific transactions.
This document is a printout of a Law & Crime article filed as a court exhibit in April 2019. It details Alan Dershowitz's aggressive denial of sexual misconduct allegations made by Virginia Roberts, characterizing them as an extortion plot effectively shielded by litigation privileges. The text also covers Dershowitz's defense of the controversial non-prosecution agreement (plea deal) secured for Jeffrey Epstein by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, with Dershowitz stating he is 'proud' of the deal as a legal achievement.
This document is a standard legal disclaimer and disclosure page (page 31) from a Goldman Sachs Investment Management Division presentation. It outlines the role of the Investment Strategy Group (ISG), disclaims liability for economic forecasts, lists global regulatory entities providing services, and details investment risks regarding money market funds and ETFs. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025694', indicating it was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely regarding financial institutions' relationships with Jeffrey Epstein, though no specific individuals are named in the text of this page.
A scanned page from a contact directory containing names, phone numbers, and addresses organized in columns. The document lists various individuals and services, including entries for Ghislaine Maxwell, Harrods, drivers, and massage services in the UK. It appears to be a page from a larger contact book, indicated by page number 88 and legal discovery stamps.
This document is a page from an address book (page 86) containing contact information for several individuals, with a significant focus on Les Wexner. It details Wexner's various properties (Aspen, London, New Albany, Tallassee Plantation), his flight department, and his company 'The Limited Inc.', listing numerous staff members, vehicles (including multiple Mercedes, Jeeps, and Range Rovers), and phone numbers. Other notable entries include fashion designer Vera Wang, Cristalle Wasche, Alexia Wallaert, and a contact entry for the White House.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity