Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Brune & Richard lawyers

Person
Mentions
2
Relationships
4
Events
10
Documents
1
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
4 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Conrad
Legal representative
6
1
View
location court
Legal representative
6
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Juror Conrad
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Hearing A hearing where Laurie Edelstein testified about the alternatives considered by the Brune & Richa... Court View
2011-07-15 Conference call Telephone conference call with the Court N/A View
2011-07-08 Legal filing Motion for a new trial filed N/A View
2011-07-08 Legal filing A Memorandum of Law was created/filed. N/A View
2011-06-20 Receipt of communication Brune & Richard lawyers received a copy of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor. N/A View
2011-01-01 N/A Discoveries/information gathering by lawyers (referenced retrospectively). Unknown View
2011-01-01 Discovery Brune & Richard lawyers made discoveries relevant to a case. N/A View
2011-01-01 Research Brune & Richard lawyers conducted research N/A View
2011-01-01 N/A Events surrounding the July 8 Memorandum of Law and discussions of ethical duties. Court View
0012-05-01 Decision Brune & Richard lawyers reviewed alternatives after an investigation and decided to do nothing re... N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00009453.jpg

This document is an exhibit (A-5849) filed on Feb 24, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), but originates from a 2012 filing in the 'United States v. Daugerdas' case (1:09-cr-00581-WHP). The text analyzes the ethical conduct of lawyers from the firm Brune & Richard regarding their knowledge of misconduct by 'juror Conrad' and whether they had a duty to disclose information discovered in March and May 2011. It concludes that the lawyers did not have 'actual knowledge' requiring disclosure under Rules 3.3(b) and 3.5(d).

Legal exhibit / court opinion or report
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
7
As Recipient
0
Total
7

Conference call

From: Brune & Richard lawyers
To: Court

Conference call with the Court

Phone call
2011-07-15
Communication Source

Conference call

From: Brune & Richard lawyers
To: Court

Conference call with the Court

Phone call
2011-07-15
Communication Source

New trial

From: Brune & Richard lawyers
To: Court

Motion for a new trial

Motion
2011-07-08
Communication Source

Memorandum of Law

From: Brune & Richard lawyers
To: Court/Tribunal

Legal filing discussed in the text regarding disclosures and discoveries made in March/May.

Memorandum
2011-07-08
Communication Source

Ethical obligations

From: Brune & Richard lawyers
To: Court

Memorandum regarding ethical obligations

Memorandum
2011-07-08
Communication Source

Ethical obligations

From: Brune & Richard lawyers
To: Court

Memorandum regarding ethical obligations

Memorandum
2011-07-08
Communication Source

New trial

From: Brune & Richard lawyers
To: Court

Motion for a new trial

Motion
2011-07-08
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search