| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sara
|
Professional exploitative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sara
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed female helper
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Haley
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Espinosa (Witness), THE COURT, MR. EVERDELL
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Speaker
|
Professional service based |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown Blond Female
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Cutler
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Interviewee
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed interviewees
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
takingbackmicrosoft (profile owner)
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Student
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Woman
|
Professional speculated |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Haley
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The lady
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED WITNESS]
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED victim]
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sara
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Wendy brings Mary to Jeff's house. They meet Jeff in the kitchen. Jeff and Wendy confer privately... | Jeff's House | View |
| N/A | Visit | A visit to a two-story, pinkish house with a pool, involving going over a bridge, encountering a ... | A house (described as two-s... | View |
| N/A | Job interview | A prior job interview conducted with the witness (Espinosa) by Jeff and Darren at an office. | the office | View |
| N/A | Job change | The witness, Espinosa, changed jobs from working with Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel to becoming... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interaction/meeting | An older man named Jeff and a tall, blonde woman (possibly his assistant) went upstairs for appro... | A residence or building wit... | View |
| N/A | Encounter / potential sexual assault | The interviewee went to a location where she met 'Jeff guy' and 'the lady'. The lady took her ups... | unspecified location | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness/victim was introduced to 'Jeff' and other females, and to 'Jeff's helper' (white female w... | Palm Beach house, kitchen area | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage setup by an assistant, followed by Jeff entering the room and receiving a massage from th... | Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeff asked the witness/victim to remove clothes; she complied. She straddled him during the massage. | Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeff turned to have his chest rubbed, then used a vibrator on the witness/victim, ejaculated, and... | Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness/victim was paid $350-$400 after the shower. | Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness visited Jeff's house with Haley. | Jeff's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Original meeting regarding case strategy | The Office | View |
| N/A | Trip | First visit to Jeff's house for a massage. The witness was taken by Haley Robson, met Sara, and g... | Jeff's house | View |
| N/A | Trip | Second visit to Jeff's house for a massage, several weeks after the first. The massage was discon... | Jeff's house | View |
| N/A | Massage services | Sara provided massages to Jeff for approximately two years, starting when she was sixteen. | Jeff's house | View |
| N/A | Meeting | An unidentified speaker and their group waited to meet a man named Jeff. They were let in by a bo... | An unspecified location wit... | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The first meeting between the witness and Jeff. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Massage | Jeff gave the witness a massage and asked how old they were. | upstairs | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual misconduct incident | Jeff's residence (Upstairs/... | View |
| N/A | N/A | First visit to Jeff's house. Victim (16) taken by driver. Massage setup. Jeff entered in towel, t... | Jeff's house (Palm Beach) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second visit to Jeff's house. Massage setup. Jeff tried to touch buttocks (blocked by jeans) and ... | Jeff's house (Palm Beach) | View |
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | Service of Subpoena to Interlochen Center for the Arts | New York (Sender location) | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Status update on new camera system installation/repair. Jeff from Signet scheduled to test system... | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Briefing by Jeff regarding the status of the situation. | Unknown | View |
This document is an email chain from August 15-16, 2019, regarding the status of security cameras at MCC New York, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. It details significant camera outages (approx. 14.3%) and establishes a protocol for daily status reports to senior prison leadership specifically regarding cameras in the SHU, Unit 2, PCU, and 10 South (where Epstein was housed). A technician from the company Signet is mentioned as working on the system and testing generator power.
An email exchange from August 12, 2019 (two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death) regarding 'DVR status'. Steve Smith, a Federal Sales Representative for SigNet Technologies, asks an unknown recipient for a morning meeting to 'game plan' next steps after he receives a briefing from a colleague named Jeff. The recipient agrees to fit the meeting in despite being busy.
This document contains an email chain from August 12, 2019 (two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death) between Steve Smith of SigNet Technologies and a redacted recipient. The subject is 'DVR status,' likely referring to video recording systems at the detention facility. Smith requests a call to 'game plan' next steps after being briefed by a colleague named Jeff, emphasizing the need to handle things 'the right way.'
An email dated August 13, 2019 (three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death) from a Federal Sales Representative at SigNet Technologies, Inc. regarding 'DVR status.' The sender proposes a morning discussion to 'game plan' next steps after receiving a briefing from a colleague named Jeff. This communication likely pertains to the technical status of the Digital Video Recorder systems at the facility involved in the investigation.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department Case Report and Persons System Report regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, covering investigations from 2001 to 2005. It details intelligence on the recruitment of young female college students from Palm Beach Atlantic College for massages, surveillance of Epstein's residence at 358 El Brillo Way, and numerous trash pulls that yielded sexually suggestive items and correspondence. The report also documents interviews with potential victims and witnesses, noting allegations of inappropriate touching and the presence of underage girls, though some investigations were initially marked as unfounded or for intelligence purposes.
An email chain from July 16, 2019, in which Susan Harriman forwards information regarding Jeffrey Epstein's financial activities. Harriman highlights a foundation named 'Enhanced Education' registered to Epstein's Virgin Islands address and links to news about donations to Ohio State University, urging the recipient to pass the information directly to an FBI agent rather than the general tip line.
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Chris, Mark, and Jeff, dated July 2, 2020. It serves as formal notification that their client (identified via attachments as Ghislaine Maxwell) was arrested by the FBI that morning in Bradford, New Hampshire. The email attaches the indictment and arrest warrant and outlines the immediate legal steps, including her transport for processing and an expected remote court presentation in the District of New Hampshire later that afternoon.
Internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated August 21, 2019, reacting to a press statement released by Governor Bill Richardson's lawyer, Jeff Brown. The prosecutor expresses frustration, noting that while they told Brown that Richardson was not currently a target or subject due to lack of information, they did not state there were no allegations against him, contrary to Brown's public statement implying exoneration. The prosecutor notes they re-contacted Brown to dispute the accuracy of the statement.
This document is an email chain from December 9, 2009, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) in West Palm Beach. The AUSA forwards an email received from attorney Roy Black regarding Jeffrey Epstein to colleagues, noting it is unusual that Black contacted them directly rather than a superior named 'Jeff'. The AUSA also mentions receiving a voicemail from attorney Brad Edwards and references a complaint against the 'Rothstein firm'.
This document is an email chain from December 2007 between Assistant U.S. Attorneys and colleagues discussing the finalization of paperwork for the Jeffrey Epstein case. The emails discuss a 'plea conference,' identifying a 'factual basis' for the 'procuring statute,' and setting a date for December 21. Notably, one Assistant U.S. Attorney expresses that they find the situation 'very demoralizing' while discussing information requests involving the FBI.
This document is an email chain from November 2007 involving Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), including Alexander Acosta (CC'd). Lefkowitz sends a response to a letter to 'Jeff'. The subsequent internal government emails discuss a Palm Beach Post article, with one official noting they 'especially like the part about how the feds were overreaching the whole time,' likely referencing public perception or a quote in the article.
This document is an email dated November 5, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach to a recipient named Jeff. The email reports that another girl has contacted the FBI after being approached by private investigators working for Epstein, suggesting potential witness tampering or intimidation during the investigation.
This document contains an email exchange from November 5, 2007, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach and an individual named Jeff. The AUSA informs Jeff that another girl has contacted the FBI after being approached by private investigators working for Epstein. Jeff acknowledges the message and notes he has not yet heard from an individual named Jay.
This document appears to be a fragmented handwritten note from August 10, 2006, detailing an encounter where an unidentified person introduced herself, went upstairs, and then stayed downstairs, while 'Jeff' came down in a robe and introduced himself. The notes also record three separate payments: $200.00, $300.00, and another $200.00, along with a phrase 'and told her'.
This document is an excerpt from a report by OPR detailing issues with the handling of the Epstein case, specifically focusing on Acosta's role. It highlights Acosta's decision-making, his perceived distance from the details of the case, and communication failures among key participants like Villafaña, Lourie, and Menchel. The report suggests Acosta's actions were driven by concerns about state authority interference, rather than an intent to benefit Epstein.
This document is an excerpt from a court filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, Document 53, Filed 09/03/19, Page 77 of 86) containing an account from a victim. The narrator describes being a 15-year-old from a small Texas town, struggling financially after her mother's death, when she was approached by a 'lady' who worked for a 'very rich man'. The lady arranged for the narrator to play violin for this man, identified only as 'J or Jeff', which escalated over four visits from massages to forced oral copulation.
This document is page 9 of a Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006. It details the account of a victim identified as 'ML', describing a massage session with Jeffrey Epstein that escalated into sexual assault, including digital penetration, despite her objections. The document also notes financial payments of $200 for the victim and $100 for a recruiter named 'YL', and introduces a second victim interview ('CL') who was recruited by Tatum Miller.
This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department detailing an interview with a victim regarding sexual misconduct by Jeffrey Epstein. The victim describes escalating inappropriate touching during massages, Epstein's knowledge of her student status, and an arrangement where Epstein's houseman rented a vehicle for her use. Police corroborated the vehicle rental details.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It focuses on a woman named Robson (also Haley Robson) who allegedly recruited underage girls to 'work' for Epstein. The document recounts police interviews with two such girls, one of whom (JS) was interviewed with her parents present, and includes a self-incriminating statement made by Robson comparing herself to 'Hollywood Madam' Heidi Fleiss.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, outlines an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details police interviews with a woman named Robson, who admitted to arranging for underage girls to 'work' for Epstein and compared herself to 'Hollywood Madam' Heidi Fleiss. The document also describes interviews with two minors recruited by Robson: a 16-year-old named JS and an unnamed 17-year-old from her high school.
This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department detailing a witness account from an individual identified as "SG." It describes SG being taken to Jeffrey Epstein's residence by an individual named Robson, meeting Epstein and his assistant Sarah Kellen, and a subsequent incident involving a massage and sexual misconduct.
This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details the testimony of a victim, identified as ML, who alleges she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein during a massage at his residence. The document describes the assault in detail, including non-consensual touching and digital penetration, and mentions payments made to ML and to another individual, YL, who brought her there. The affidavit also notes the identification of a second victim, CL, who was recruited to work for Epstein at age fifteen by a high school friend.
This document is a probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department. It details an encounter between a witness/victim and Jeffrey Epstein, including allegations of sexual misconduct and financial transactions. The affidavit also mentions meetings with detectives and other individuals involved in the investigation.
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, sworn by Det. Joe Recarey on May 1, 2006, details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines evidence against Haley Robson for recruiting underage girls, including a recorded statement where she compares herself to 'Heidi Fleiss'. The document also describes interviews with two minors, JS and another unnamed girl, who were brought to Epstein's residence or another house by Robson.
This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit filed by the Palm Beach Police Department charging Sarah Kellen with multiple counts related to unlawful sexual activity with a minor. It details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's residence where minors, allegedly recruited by Haley Robson, were brought to perform massages that escalated into sexual acts. The affidavit specifically cites the testimony of a fourteen-year-old victim identified as "SG."
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Jeff | [Redacted] (16-ye... | $200.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Jeff | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage/sexual act | View |
| N/A | Paid | Jeff | [REDACTED] | $400.00 | Payment for massage/sexual act | View |
| 2004-11-01 | Paid | Jeff | [REDACTED] (victim) | $400.00 | Payment for massage/sexual encounter (stated as... | View |
| 2004-09-01 | Paid | Jeff | [REDACTED victim] | $200.00 | Payment for the massage | View |
| 2004-09-01 | Paid | Jeff | [REDACTED] (victim) | $200.00 | Payment for massage | View |
The witness denied that Jeff (Jeffrey Epstein) ever text messaged them.
Jeff told the victim to leave her telephone number with his assistant because he wanted to see her again and his assistant would contact her for work.
Jeff would come into town and Sara would call him to set up a massage appointment.
"Sarah... You can take Mary upstairs."
The witness denied that Jeff (Jeffrey Epstein) ever chatted with them in a chat room.
The witness denied that Jeff (Jeffrey Epstein) ever e-mailed them.
The witness stated they had never spoken to or met Jeff (Jeffrey Epstein) before going to his house.
Attaching response to a November 5 letter.
Hi Jeff – Another girl just called FBI after being approached by private investigators for Epstein.
Jeff asks what's going on and suggests they hang out, mentioning he never sees the profile owner in school.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity