| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Jurisdictional coordination conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Jurisdictional coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
1 CLEARLAKE CENTRE LLC
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States attorney
|
Jurisdictional separation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO (Federal Prosecutors)
|
Conflict jurisdictional dispute |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
PALM BEACH POLICE
|
Professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated stopped communicating |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Obligated to discuss with |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency communication |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Investigated involved in case of |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to actions |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAFLS
|
Professional jurisdictional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of prosecution by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Distrust |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Federal Prosecutor (Sender)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
PBPD
|
Adversarial distrust |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement consultation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
federal prosecutors
|
Professional strained |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001-05-01 | N/A | Palm Beach PD asked the state attorney's office to issue an arrest warrant for Jeffrey Epstein | Palm Beach, FL | View |
This document is an envelope from the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. in Miami, Florida, addressed to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. The envelope is postmarked April 2, 2008, from North Miami Beach, FL, with postage of $0.41. The document also contains footer information indicating it is page 35 of 114 from a public records request dated 07/26/17.
This document is a Certificate of Service dated April 2, 2008, certifying that a legal document was sent via facsimile and U.S. mail to attorneys Jack A. Goldberger and Lanna Leigh Belohlavek in West Palm Beach, Florida. The document is part of a larger file (page 34 of 114) released under a Public Records Request in 2017.
This document is a page from a plea agreement involving Epstein, detailing sentencing timelines and conditions regarding 'gain time' during incarceration in Florida. It outlines confidentiality expectations and stipulates that if Epstein fulfills the agreement, the United States will not prosecute named co-conspirators and will suspend federal Grand Jury investigations.
This document is a page from a plea agreement outlining the terms under which Epstein will plead guilty to charges in Palm Beach County, Florida. He agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and another offense requiring sex offender registration, in exchange for a recommended 30-month sentence divided into 18 months of county jail and 12 months of community control. The agreement is contingent on a judge's approval and also stipulates that Epstein will provide documents to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
This page is part of a legal agreement detailing the terms under which the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, R. Alexander Acosta, agrees to defer federal prosecution of Epstein. The deferral is in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, contingent upon Epstein's compliance with the agreement's conditions. The document also outlines the procedure for initiating federal prosecution, including a notice period, should Epstein violate the terms.
This is a 'Request for Warrant' form filed by Detective Joe Recarey of the Palm Beach Police Department on May 1, 2006, against defendant Haley Robson (DOB 04-09-1986). The document indicates the victim was acquainted with the defendant and lists case number 05-368 (3). Handwritten notes on the filing checklist confirm that the Witness/Evidence List, Criminal History, and Property Receipt were 'Previously Given to ASA Belohlavek.'
This document is a 'Request for Warrant' from the Palm Beach Police Department for defendant Jeffrey Epstein, dated May 1, 2006. The form, completed by Lead Officer Det. Joe Recaery, indicates that the victim was acquainted with Epstein and lists several attached case documents (arrest form, affidavits, etc.) that were delivered to the State Attorney's Office, with some items having been previously given to ASA Belohlavek.
This document is a 'Request for Warrant' from the Palm Beach Police Department regarding defendant Sarah Kellen, dated May 1, 2006. The lead officer is Detective Joe Recarey (ID #7915), investigating case number 05-368 (2). Handwritten notes indicate that the witness/evidence list, criminal history, and property receipt were previously given to Assistant State Attorney (ASA) Belohlavek.
This document is the 'Appearances' page (Page 2) of a legal transcript, likely a deposition or hearing related to the Epstein investigation. It lists Daliah H. Weiss representing the State, Donnie Murrell representing a witness, and Detective Joe Recarey of the Palm Beach Police Department as present. The document bears a footer date of 07/26/17, which refers to a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) processing date rather than the original event date.
This document is the cover page or envelope for a letter dated July 26, 2017, from the law firm Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A. to the State Attorney's Office, Circuit Court Division. Both entities are located in West Palm Beach, Florida. The document includes a public records request number (17-295) and a Department of Justice control number (DOJ-OGR-00030533).
This letter, dated February 9, 2006, is from Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek to attorney Guy Fronstin. It formally invites Fronstin's client, Jeffrey Epstein, to voluntarily appear before the Palm Beach County Grand Jury on March 7, 2006, to address 'matters suggesting possible criminal conduct.' The letter explicitly states that this is not an offer of immunity, participation is voluntary, and any testimony provided by Epstein could be used against him in a future criminal prosecution.
This document is an image of an envelope or a cover sheet for a mailed item. It indicates that ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A., a law firm, sent mail to Lanna Belohlavek, Esquire, at the State Attorney's Office. The mail was postmarked on August 5, 2005, with a postage of $0.630.
This document is a letter from Jack A. Goldberger outlining the terms of a pretrial intervention agreement for his client, Mr. Epstein, following a meeting on July 21, 2006. The agreement requires Epstein, at his own expense, to undergo polygraphs by George Slattery & Associates and sessions with Dr. Stephen Alexander, with results reported to the State Attorney's Office. A key condition is that Epstein must provide a formal admission of soliciting women for prostitution (related to Case No. 06-9454 CF A99) to be kept on file by the State Attorney's Office for potential future prosecution if the agreement is violated.
This legal document, filed on December 6, 2006, is a 'Waiver of Speedy Trial' for the case of the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey E. Epstein in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The document, signed by Epstein's attorney Jack A. Goldberger, formally relinquishes the defendant's right to a speedy trial. It also certifies that copies were mailed to the State Attorney's Office and to Epstein himself.
This document is a scanned envelope sent by the law firm Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. (known for representing Jeffrey Epstein) to Lanna Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach, Florida. The envelope bears a postage meter stamp dated January 2, but a vertical received/processed stamp dated December 3, 2008. The document was part of a public records request processed in 2017.
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated January 2, 2008. It confirms service or address to Lanna Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach and is signed by attorney Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. The document bears Department of Justice Bates stamps and public records request identifiers from 2017.
This is a legal Notice of Hearing filed on December 7, 2007, for the case of the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 2006CF009454AXX). The notice, sent by Epstein's attorney Jack A. Goldberger, schedules a Plea Conference before Judge Sandra McSorley for January 4, 2008. A copy was furnished to the State Attorney's Office via Lanna Belohlavek.
This document is the signature page of a legal filing faxed on January 2, 2008. It features the signature of attorney Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., certifying service to Lanna Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach, Florida. The page is part of a larger Department of Justice public records release dated July 26, 2017.
This document is an envelope from the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. in Miami, FL, addressed to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach, FL. The envelope was postmarked on January 18, 2008, and stamped as received on January 22, 2008, indicating a legal or professional communication between the two parties.
This letter, dated January 18, 2008, is from attorney Jeffrey Herman of the law firm Herman & Mermelstein PA to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. Herman formally notifies the State Attorney's Office that his firm has been retained to represent a client and his minor daughter in their legal claim against Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 5 of a legal agreement (the Non-Prosecution Agreement) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines sentencing dates (2007/2008), stipulations regarding 'gain time' in prison, and a confidentiality clause attempting to keep the agreement out of the public record. Crucially, it contains the controversial immunity clause stating the U.S. will not prosecute any potential co-conspirators (names redacted) and agrees to suspend the federal Grand Jury investigation.
This legal document outlines several terms of an agreement with Epstein, stipulating that he must waive challenges to information from the State Attorney's Office, enter a guilty plea by September 28, 2007, and begin his sentence by October 15, 2007. In exchange, the United States will provide his attorneys with a list of up to forty victims and move for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. The document also details Epstein's waiver of his constitutional right to a speedy trial.
This document is a page from an OPR report detailing the failure of the USAO (specifically Acosta, Villafaña, and Sloman) to coordinate with the State Attorney's Office regarding victim notification for Jeffrey Epstein's June 2008 plea hearing. It reveals that despite a draft letter in December 2007 intended to provide a list of victims to the state, no evidence exists that the letter was sent, leaving state prosecutors (Krischer and Belohlavek) unaware of the federal identified victims. A footnote highlights that Epstein's attorneys explicitly asked the USAO not to inform victims of their rights under state charges.
This document is a page from a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report criticizing Alexander Acosta for 'poor judgment' during the Jeffrey Epstein case. Specifically, it details how Acosta failed to ensure victims identified in the federal investigation were notified of the state plea hearing, erroneously deferring this responsibility to the State Attorney without communicating that decision or providing the necessary victim information. The report highlights that while not legally required to notify victims of a state hearing, Acosta should have recognized the logistical failures that would result from a lack of coordination.
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report detailing the decision-making process behind the failure to notify victims of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 state plea hearing. It highlights a December 19, 2007 letter where US Attorney Acosta deferred notification responsibility to the State Attorney, citing jurisdiction issues. The text reveals internal conflicts and justifications, including fear that victim notification might cause the plea deal (NPA) to fall apart or lead to victim impeachment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity