Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OFF
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] AUSA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Efrain Reyes
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Oath Keepers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Investigation (2018R01618)
|
Investigating authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell by the Southern District of New York | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were in touch with the Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-10 | N/A | UMB received a request/subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. | UMB (Kansas City, MO) | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Filing of detention submission document for JE (Jeffrey Epstein). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Miami Herald filed federal court motion seeking access to sealed documents. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009466.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a curriculum vitae or list of professional activities for Stephen Gillers. It details his public service roles and activities on various legal committees, commissions, and bar associations from the late 1970s through the early 1990s. The document also lists his state and federal bar memberships, including admission to the New York bar in 1968 and the United States Supreme Court bar in 1972.
DOJ-OGR-00009448.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal opinion or declaration filed in April 2012 (and re-filed in 2022) regarding the ethical conduct of lawyers from the firm Brune & Richard. The text argues that the lawyers had no obligation to disclose certain research regarding juror Catherine Conrad at specific times. It lists various documents reviewed, including briefs, letters, and hearing transcripts from 2011 and 2012, and cites New York Rules of Professional Conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009308.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The testimony covers Brune's professional background, specifically leaving the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York in November 1997 to start the law firm Brune & Richard with Hillary Richard in February 1998. The witness confirms that while Hillary Richard has done criminal cases, she is primarily a civil lawyer.
DOJ-OGR-00004816.jpg
This document is a page from a filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), but the text itself recounts the narrative of the Bill Cosby sexual assault case (Commonwealth v. Cosby, [J-100-2020]). It details the progression of the relationship between Andrea Constand and Bill Cosby, including meetings at Temple University, dinners at Cosby's Cheltenham residence involving unwanted physical contact, and a trip to Foxwoods Casino in late 2003. This document was likely filed in the Maxwell case as legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements or evidence of prior bad acts.
DOJ-OGR-00004810.jpg
This legal letter, dated July 2, 2021, from Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan, cites the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision vacating William Henry Cosby Jr.'s conviction. The letter argues that this precedent supports Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges, as the government allegedly failed to honor a non-prosecution agreement, similar to the District Attorney's office in the Cosby case. It details the circumstances of the Cosby case, including Andrea Constand's allegations and the initial decision by DA Bruce Castor not to prosecute due to insufficient evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00014616.jpg
This document is page 216 of a court transcript (Document 767) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains the judge's charge to the jury regarding 'Count Three,' specifically outlining the requirements to prove a conspiracy to transport minors for illegal sexual activity between 1994 and 2004. The text explains that the jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant agreed with another person to commit these acts.
DOJ-OGR-00011738.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details procedural discussions between the Judge, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey regarding jury instructions for handling binders, the display of nonsealed exhibits, and a recess. The text also outlines the court's plan for the trial schedule over the Christmas and New Year's holidays.
DOJ-OGR-00025180.jpg
This document is an email chain from November 5, 2019, initiated by a U.S. Marshal's request for reports on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The request is forwarded by MCC New York Associate Warden Charisma Edge to other Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, including James Petrucci. The response from Petrucci and a drafted official reply both state that no report can be released because the investigation is active and ongoing, directing any inquiries to the BOP's Office of General Counsel, the OIG, or the FBI.
DOJ-OGR-00020042.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her defense counsel was in regular communication with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive who was hiding and changing locations.
DOJ-OGR-00005402.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated October 29, 2021, arguing for the use of pseudonyms for testifying victims. It cites several legal precedents from the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, including the cases of Raniere, Martinez, Schulte, and Hernandez, to support the argument that protecting victims from harassment, embarrassment, and encouraging testimony outweighs defense interests, particularly in sensitive cases like sex trafficking and national security.
DOJ-OGR-00005382.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 3 of 3) of a legal filing submitted on October 26, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is signed by Damian Williams (United States Attorney) and Assistant US Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach on behalf of the Southern District of New York. The document indicates a copy was sent to Defense Counsel via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00005318.jpg
This document is a transcript of Judge Alison Nathan's preliminary remarks to potential jurors in the case of United States v. Maxwell, filed on October 22, 2021. The judge welcomes the jury pool to the Southern District of New York and outlines the two-phase jury selection process, which includes filling out a questionnaire and potential in-person questioning starting in mid-November.
DOJ-OGR-00020382.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on May 27, 2021, for Case 21-58. Assistant United States Attorney Maurene Comey certifies that a related opposition filing adheres to the word count limitations set by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, stating the document contains 5,164 words.
DOJ-OGR-00020381.jpg
This is the conclusion page of a legal document filed on May 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach argue that a motion filed by an individual named Maxwell should be denied. The document is electronically signed by Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00002861.jpg
This document is page 19 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 29, 2021. It details overt acts including Epstein sending a package via FedEx to Minor Victim-4 in Florida in 2002, and Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or employees calling the victim between 2001 and 2004 to schedule massages. The page also introduces Count Six, charging Maxwell with Sex Trafficking of a Minor between 2001 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00002853.jpg
This document is page 11 of a criminal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in March 2021. It details allegations that between 2001 and 2004, Maxwell and Epstein groomed 'Minor Victim-4' by sending gifts (including lingerie) and encouraged her to recruit other underage girls for sexualized massages at the Palm Beach residence in exchange for cash. Additionally, it alleges that in 2016, Maxwell committed perjury during a civil deposition regarding her role in these abuses.
DOJ-OGR-00002823.jpg
This legal document details the procedural history of the criminal case against Schulte, a former CIA employee. It covers his August 2017 arrest for leaking national defense information, subsequent indictments, and a trial in early 2020 which resulted in a guilty verdict on two counts and a mistrial on eight others. The document concludes by noting that the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City immediately after the trial caused a suspension of court proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00014464.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe. She argues that crimes occurred within the Southern District of New York, citing evidence related to several counts, including trips to Manhattan by individuals named Jane and Annie, and Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule 'sexualized massages' in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005254.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 5) of a legal filing from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, filed on October 18, 2021 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 355). The text concludes an argument regarding jury selection (voir dire), stating that group discussion is safe and efficient. It is signed by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00005245.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated October 15, 2021. It contains a submission by the US Attorney's office followed by a 'SO ORDERED' endorsement from the Judge (Alison J. Nathan). The Judge denies a specific order requested by the defense but establishes a firm expectation that Maxwell should receive legal mail within approximately one business day to ensure she can prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005240.jpg
This is the final page (page 4) of a legal filing by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues against the defense's schedule regarding 'sensitive issues' and requests the Court maintain the October 18, 2021, deadline for Rule 412 motions (regarding admissibility of victim sexual history), or set a final deadline of October 25, 2021. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach under US Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00005236.jpg
This is the signature page (page 3 of 3) for Document 350 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 15, 2021. The document is submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York. It indicates that Defense Counsel was copied via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00020129.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The court cites her substantial resources, foreign ties (including citizenship in a non-extradition country), history of living in hiding, and lack of candor regarding finances as reasons for considering her a flight risk. The background section outlines the timeline of her indictment in June 2020, arrest in New Hampshire in July 2020, and the previous denial of bail on July 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00008800.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3 of 3) of a legal filing submitted on January 5, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is respectfully submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York. The document notes that Defense Counsel was copied via the Electronic Case Files (ECF) system.
DOJ-OGR-00008763.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Instruction No. 40) for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 19, 2021. It defines the legal concept of 'Venue' within the Southern District of New York and lists the specific counties included in that jurisdiction. The instruction clarifies that the Government must prove venue by a 'preponderance of the evidence' rather than 'beyond a reasonable doubt,' stating that Maxwell must be acquitted of any specific offense if venue is not established for it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity