Trove
Sign In Sign Up

prosecution

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
5
Events
35
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
5 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization Defense
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
organization Defense
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization DOJ-OIG
Information sharing
5
1
View
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization Defense
Adversarial
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Parkinson. Courtroom View
N/A Jury selection (voir dire) The document argues for the necessity of individual and sequestered voir dire due to the sensitiv... Federal jury trial View
N/A Legal proceeding Discussion of factors determining if a government agency is part of the 'prosecution team' for di... N/A View
N/A N/A Stipulation regarding Defense Exhibit A-1 being received in evidence. Court View
2022-06-22 Court filing Filing of Document 670 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-03-11 Legal filing Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-02-25 Legal filing Filing of Document 620 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-02-24 N/A Filing of Document 615 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Court View
2021-12-17 N/A Deadline for parties to docket their respective letters USDC SDNY View
2021-12-16 N/A Deadline for parties to submit letters regarding legal authority USDC SDNY View
2021-12-07 N/A Court Adjournment Courtroom View
2021-11-29 N/A Scheduled date for opening statements. Court View
2021-11-29 N/A Parties exercised peremptory strikes; twelve jurors and six alternates were seated. Court View
2021-11-10 N/A Scheduled Conference Court View
2021-11-10 N/A Status Conference Courtroom 110, 40 Centre St... View
2021-11-01 N/A In-person pretrial conference Courtroom 518, Thurgood Mar... View
2021-10-29 Legal filing Filing of Document 383 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2021-10-22 Legal filing Filing of Document 365 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2021-10-12 N/A Deadline for parties to submit joint letter regarding trial estimate. USDC SDNY View
2021-10-11 N/A Deadline for proposed juror questionnaire and joint proposed voir dire. SDNY View
2021-10-08 N/A Conversation between prosecution and recipients regarding the case Unknown View
2021-10-04 N/A Discovery production made available to defense counsel via USAfx and to defendant via CD. New York View
2021-05-13 N/A Parties conferred by telephone for approximately 45 minutes regarding the pretrial schedule. Telephone View
2021-04-16 Legal filing Filing of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2021-04-01 N/A Court Hearing Court (Southern District) View

DOJ-OGR-00021991.jpg

This is the final page (page 15) of a court transcript filed on December 19, 2019, for Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. The judge rules to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act until April 20, 2020, to allow for discovery production and motion preparation. The hearing is adjourned, and the defendants' bail status remains unchanged.

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008983.jpg

This legal document is a motion filed by 'Juror 50' on February 24, 2022, requesting to intervene in a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The juror seeks to protect his privacy rights and right against self-incrimination in light of a potential investigation into juror misconduct. To determine whether to file a brief, Juror 50 requests access to his jury questionnaire and voir dire transcript, asking that they be released under seal to his attorney, the Prosecution, and Defense Counsel.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005215.jpg

This legal document, filed on October 13, 2021, argues for the necessity of individual, sequestered voir dire (jury questioning) for a high-publicity case involving a well-known defendant. The filing contends that the sensitive and inflammatory nature of the charges, specifically sexual abuse of minors, makes it unlikely for jurors to be candid in a group setting, thus hindering the ability of both the defense and prosecution to identify biases and ensure a fair trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$150,000.00
1 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$150,000.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received State/Government prosecution $150,000.00 Prosecution costs for the Tyson case. View
As Sender
5
As Recipient
3
Total
8

Relevance of uncharged conduct and witness testimony

From: prosecution
To: Court

Ms. Moe refers to issues 'raised in advance of trial' and 'briefed in advance'.

Briefing/notes
N/A
Communication Source

3500 Material

From: prosecution
To: defense

Discovery material (Jencks Act material) referenced by Ms. Moe.

Document
N/A
Communication Source

Memory studies

From: prosecution
To: Loftus

Loftus admitted on cross-examination that core memories of trauma are stronger than other types of memory.

Cross-examination
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pretrial schedule discussions

From: prosecution
To: defense

45-minute discussion regarding pretrial schedule proposals.

Telephone conference
2021-05-13
Communication Source

JE defense supplemental letter requesting preservation an...

From: defense
To: prosecution

Referenced in attachment filename.

Letter
2019-08-01
Communication Source

JE defense letter requesting preservation and production

From: defense
To: prosecution

Referenced in attachment filename.

Letter
2019-07-26
Communication Source

Sex offender registration status

From: prosecution
To: New York state authori...

Following up on the Court's question regarding the defendant's registration status.

Meeting/conferral
2019-07-24
Communication Source

Rejection of federal plea and shift to state-only resolution

From: defense
To: prosecution

Defense rejected the federal plea option and resumed negotiations for an NPA for Epstein to plead to only state charges.

Negotiation
2007-09-20
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search