| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Defense
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DOJ-OIG
|
Information sharing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-24 | Legal deadline | Deadline for the parties to meet and confer regarding redactions to the Defendant's reply brief. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-28 | N/A | Court Order directing parties to indicate proposed redactions. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-10 | N/A | Court Hearing / Bail Hearing | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-01 | N/A | Deadline set by Judge Nathan for parties to provide an update letter. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Scheduled Arraignment, Initial Conference, and Bail Hearing (Remote). | Remote / Teleconference | View |
| 2020-07-06 | N/A | Judge Nathan directs parties to file a letter by 9pm. | Court | View |
| 2020-04-24 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 35 in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. | N/A | View |
| 2020-04-10 | N/A | Deadline for prosecution opposition | Court | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (USA v. Epstein). | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 0011-10-01 | N/A | Receipt of discovery material (3500 material) | N/A | View |
This is the final page (page 15) of a court transcript filed on December 19, 2019, for Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. The judge rules to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act until April 20, 2020, to allow for discovery production and motion preparation. The hearing is adjourned, and the defendants' bail status remains unchanged.
This legal document is a motion filed by 'Juror 50' on February 24, 2022, requesting to intervene in a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The juror seeks to protect his privacy rights and right against self-incrimination in light of a potential investigation into juror misconduct. To determine whether to file a brief, Juror 50 requests access to his jury questionnaire and voir dire transcript, asking that they be released under seal to his attorney, the Prosecution, and Defense Counsel.
This legal document, filed on October 13, 2021, argues for the necessity of individual, sequestered voir dire (jury questioning) for a high-publicity case involving a well-known defendant. The filing contends that the sensitive and inflammatory nature of the charges, specifically sexual abuse of minors, makes it unlikely for jurors to be candid in a group setting, thus hindering the ability of both the defense and prosecution to identify biases and ensure a fair trial.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | State/Government | prosecution | $150,000.00 | Prosecution costs for the Tyson case. | View |
Ms. Moe refers to issues 'raised in advance of trial' and 'briefed in advance'.
Discovery material (Jencks Act material) referenced by Ms. Moe.
Loftus admitted on cross-examination that core memories of trauma are stronger than other types of memory.
45-minute discussion regarding pretrial schedule proposals.
Referenced in attachment filename.
Referenced in attachment filename.
Following up on the Court's question regarding the defendant's registration status.
Defense rejected the federal plea option and resumed negotiations for an NPA for Epstein to plead to only state charges.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity