Ruiz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Flachsbart's nonprofit projects
|
Founder consultant |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Ruiz, 894 F.2d 501 (2d Cir. 1990) | 2d Cir. | View |
| 1989-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Ruiz, 702 F. Supp. 1066 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1986-01-01 | N/A | Ruiz lied to a grand jury about possession of a Senate Ethics Committee letter. | New York | View |
| 1984-01-01 | N/A | Ruiz made false statements on loan applications. | New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00003106.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a defendant's motion. The prosecution asserts that the defendant's false statements, made in a civil deposition, were intended to obstruct a criminal investigation by the FBI and a grand jury, and are therefore connected to the substantive offenses. The argument cites several legal precedents to support the claim that the charges should not be severed.
DOJ-OGR-00003105.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing arguing against a defendant's motion to sever charges. The prosecution contends that perjury charges from 2016 (Counts Five and Six) are directly connected to earlier charges of victim abuse from 1994-1997 and 1999-2002 (Counts One through Four). The connection is based on the defendant's broad, false denials in 2016 of the very conduct alleged in the earlier counts, including a scheme involving Giuffre, Epstein, and Minor Victim-2.
DOJ-OGR-00003104.jpg
This document is page 170 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text presents a legal argument supporting the joinder of perjury charges with substantive offenses, citing the precedent of *United States v. Ruiz* regarding a NY State Senator who lied to conceal a financial scheme. The prosecution argues that, like in *Ruiz*, the current defendant's perjury was part of a common scheme to conceal her role in the charged sexual offenses.
DOJ-OGR-00002956.jpg
This document is page xxi from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It serves as a table of authorities, listing various legal precedents in the format 'United States v. [Defendant]'. Each entry includes the case citation and the corresponding page numbers where it is referenced within the main document.
Unknown
Letter regarding ethics, possession of which was lied about to a Grand Jury.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity