Trove
Sign In Sign Up

GOVERNMENT

Organization
Mentions
2805
Relationships
178
Events
870
Documents
1344
Also known as:
Government of Australia Government of the Republic of Cyprus United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Office of Government Relations PRC Government US Government (The Americans) Government Exhibit Office of Government Information Services Government / USA Orban Government Palestinian government IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE) Hamas Government Saudi Arabian government Orange County, California (Government) Netanyahu government British Government American government Pakistan Government/Military Canadian Government Australian government Government of Ecuador New Zealand Government Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands Gov't (Government) Government / DOJ American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals United States of America (Government) US Government (implied by SDNY context)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
178 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Lack of communication contact
1
1
View
person Witness-3
Witness subject of motion
1
1
View
person Recipient
Investigative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... N/A View
N/A N/A Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... N/A View
N/A N/A Argument that defendants should be able to rely on government promises in written agreements and ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... N/A View
N/A N/A Broader investigation into Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, covering periods beyond the Indictment. N/A View
N/A N/A Government's review of 'Materials' (documents and photographs) related to Epstein's sexual abuse ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... N/A View
N/A N/A Ex parte proceeding where government allegedly misled Chief Judge McMahon to obtain a subpoena. Court View
N/A N/A Client's arrest and detention despite voluntary surrender. N/A View
N/A N/A Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. Court View
N/A N/A Government initiated a massive OPR investigation into the execution of the NPA. N/A View
N/A N/A Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... N/A View
N/A N/A NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims N/A View
N/A N/A Search warrants executed at properties of Jeffrey Epstein. New York and Virgin Islands View
N/A N/A Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... N/A View
N/A N/A Depositions taken as a result of government-supported civil suits against the speaker. N/A View
N/A N/A Indictment of Thomas S.D.N.Y. View
N/A N/A Opening of Grand Jury Investigation Unknown View
N/A N/A Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Planned resolution of pending redaction issues N/A View
N/A N/A Victims' lawsuit against the government Court View
N/A N/A Ex parte modification of the protective order by Judge McMahon. Court View

DOJ-OGR-00020577.jpg

This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.

Court docket / legal case log
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020568.jpg

This legal document is a court docket summary from July 2022, detailing filings and orders from February 2022 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries, primarily orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan, concern procedural matters like redactions and amicus briefs. The most significant action is the Court's order for an evidentiary hearing to investigate whether 'Juror 50' failed to truthfully disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection, a matter which could impact the validity of the trial's verdict.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020532.jpg

This document is a page from a court docket related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from August 23, 2021, to August 30, 2021. It details various orders and letters, including the scheduling of a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and the resolution of issues regarding attorney-client video teleconferences.

Court docket sheet
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020516.jpg

This document is a court docket log from April 16, 2021, detailing significant rulings by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and other grounds, but granted the motion to sever perjury charges for a separate trial. The document also notes the filing of reply memoranda by defense attorney Christian Everdell and establishes deadlines for pretrial disclosures involving Brady and Giglio materials.

Court docket / case log
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020515.jpg

This document is a page from a court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from April 15 and April 16, 2021. It details a motion to continue the trial date, an order regarding redactions of documents, a government memorandum opposing various defense motions to dismiss or suppress evidence, and an order regarding the filing of reply briefs and redactions.

Court docket / legal filing log
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020503.jpg

This legal document, a page from the court docket in Case 22-1426, details several filings and orders from December 2020 concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan issues an order approving redactions to letters, denying an in-camera conference, and setting a detailed briefing schedule for Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document also logs letters filed on Maxwell's behalf by Christian R. Everdell, as well as a letter from Sophia Papapetru and John Wallace regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020472.jpg

This document is a page from the docket of the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, showing entries from April 2022. It details the denial of a motion for a new trial involving Juror 50, scheduling orders for sentencing, and an Opinion & Order denying a Rule 29 motion while granting a motion regarding multiplicitous counts. The document establishes that judgment of conviction will be entered on Counts Three, Four, and Six.

Court docket report
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020468.jpg

This document is a page from a court docket related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing proceedings and filings in late February 2022. It includes orders regarding the questioning of Juror 50, motions for a new trial, amicus briefs, and various correspondence between the defense, prosecution, and Judge Alison J. Nathan.

Court docket sheet
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020467.jpg

This document is a court docket summary from February 2022 for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details several procedural orders regarding motions for a new trial, redactions to protect juror privacy, and the filing of an amicus brief. The most significant entry is an order granting an evidentiary hearing to investigate whether Juror 50 failed to truthfully disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection, while denying a broader hearing involving other jurors.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020462.jpg

This document is a court docket log covering the proceedings of the jury trial against Ghislaine Maxwell from December 21, 2021, to January 5, 2022. It records daily minute entries for the trial, the guilty verdict on multiple counts, subsequent orders regarding sentencing schedules and medical requests, and various letters filed by legal counsel.

Court docket / case log
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020450.jpg

This document is a log of court filings from November 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries detail orders and a memorandum opinion concerning evidentiary motions, specifically the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court is ruling on what testimony from this witness regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein will be permissible, setting deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to court documents.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020431.jpg

This document contains a series of court docket entries from August 2021 related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding unsealing documents, scheduling a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and addressing attorney-client communication issues at the MDC. It also logs various letters exchanged between the defense counsel and the prosecution.

Court docket sheet
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020414.jpg

This document is a page from the court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 15-16, 2021. It lists several entries, including a motion by the defense to continue the trial date, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions and the docketing of legal memorandums, and the Government's memorandum in opposition to twelve pre-trial motions filed by the defense. The judge also issued an order regarding the filing of reply briefs and procedures for requesting redactions.

Court docket (case 22-1426)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020408.jpg

This document is a court docket sheet dated February 4, 2021, listing numerous filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan requiring the docketing of redacted documents, followed by a series of defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment based on arguments including due process, perjury, pre-indictment delay, and breach of a non-prosecution agreement. The filings identify Maxwell's attorneys as Jeffrey Pagliuca and Mark Cohen.

Court docket sheet / case log
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020402.jpg

This legal document, a page from a court case file dated July 8, 2022, details court activities from December 2020 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes a court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions to letters, denying an in-camera conference, and ordering parties to prepare a briefing schedule for Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The document also logs several letters filed with the court and a subsequent order establishing specific deadlines for the bail motion submissions.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00019022.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. An attorney, Ms. Comey, asks the judge to direct the jury to review Government Exhibit 14, specifically focusing on a child's name and birth date entry. The opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, states he has no objection to this request.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018990.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Comey, and the judge regarding whether the defense had an adequate opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The judge also mentions a planned briefing on "Government Exhibit 52" as indicated by a Mr. Rohrbach.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018978.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers authenticates their pilot logbook, confirming it is an accurate record kept in the regular course of their duties. The government attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully moves to admit the logbook into evidence as a sealed exhibit (662) and a redacted public version (662-R), which the court accepts without objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018977.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers, a former employee and crew member for Mr. Epstein, describes a personal logbook they maintained, which recorded flight dates, destinations, flight times, and passenger names for only the flights they personally worked on. The witness is then directed to examine a document identified as Government Exhibit 662.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018970.jpg

This document is a transcript of a sidebar conference during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense (Mr. Everdell) argues against admitting evidence regarding the death of Maxwell's father and her subsequent move to a smaller apartment, claiming it predates the alleged conspiracy by three years. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues this evidence is relevant to establish motive, specifically that Maxwell was not wealthy and participated in crimes with Jeffrey Epstein in exchange for financial support, including the purchase of a large townhouse.

Court transcript (sidebar conference)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018962.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a transition between witnesses. After counsel finishes with a witness named Mrs. Hesse, she is excused, and the government's counsel, Ms. Comey, calls David Rodgers to the stand. Mr. Rodgers is sworn in and, during the initial phase of his direct examination, identifies his profession as a pilot.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018951.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse, by an attorney named Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on confirming the spelling of the name 'Carolyn' and identifying a specific message on 'Government Exhibit 2T' that is addressed 'for Mr. Epstein'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018949.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It shows a brief portion of the direct examination of a witness named Hesse, where a questioner directs their attention to a piece of evidence labeled "Government Exhibit 1B".

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018946.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a discussion between the judge and an attorney, Ms. Moe, about admitting message books as evidence. The judge overrules an objection and indicates a preference for admitting the full books, which Ms. Moe agrees to. Following this exchange, the witness, Mrs. Hesse, is dismissed.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018940.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Prosecutor Ms. Moe discusses the admissibility and formatting of message exhibits and specifically reads from Government Exhibit 606, a 'household manual,' detailing strict instructions for employees on how to record phone messages.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search