state attorney

Person
Mentions
22
Relationships
9
Events
14
Documents
11

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
9 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Professional
5
1
View
person Michele Pagan
Professional
5
1
View
person Alexander Acosta
Professional deferential
5
1
View
organization USAO
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Alexander Acosta
Professional jurisdictional
5
1
View
person Michael Reiter
Conflict
5
1
View
organization PALM BEACH POLICE
Professional conflict
1
1
View
person Villafaña
Corresponded via email
1
1
View
person Detective
Receiving information via subpoena from
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Hearing A court hearing is held on the matter of the offender's petition for relief from registration. the circuit in which the pe... View
N/A N/A Referral of case to FBI Palm Beach View
N/A Legal proceeding A state plea hearing for which State Attorney Acosta deferred victim notification to the state. N/A View
N/A N/A State Attorney in Palm Beach County dropped a case regarding Jane Doe #3. Palm Beach County View
2025-12-22 N/A Meeting with State Attorney regarding Epstein's custody at the jail. N/A View
2021-04-23 N/A Plea Hearing SDNY Court View
2018-01-01 N/A Grand Jury proceedings Court View
2008-06-30 N/A State Plea Hearing State Court (implied) View
2008-02-20 Legal proceeding A direct examination took place where Jack Goldberger's co-counsel refused to provide copies of d... N/A View
2007-09-12 N/A Meeting of USAO representatives, Epstein's defense attorneys, State Attorney, and lead state pros... Unknown View
2006-05-01 N/A Plea deal negotiation where the State Attorney offered Epstein a misdemeanor with probation inste... Palm Beach (Implied) View
2006-01-01 N/A State Attorney agreed to charge Epstein only with one count of aggravated assault with no intent ... Florida View
2005-10-07 N/A Subpoena issued and executed/delivered to witness. Palm Beach County, FL View
2005-07-15 N/A Transmission of a document containing an agreement regarding confidential information obtained vi... Palm Beach View

DOJ-OGR-00000190.tif

This document discusses the legal proceedings and agreements related to Epstein, detailing how his sentencing was handled and reduced. It highlights Acosta's role in approving the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and references an email exchange between the State Attorney and Villafaña regarding the resolution of the case. The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) concluded that the agreement allowed Epstein to resolve a federal investigation for an 18-month state sentence.

Report excerpt / legal analysis
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00023321.tif

This document is a conclusion from an OPR report detailing the investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by federal prosecutors. It outlines the Miami Herald's 2018 report, the subsequent OPR investigation into the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving R. Alexander Acosta, and the findings regarding victim rights violations. The report identifies five former USAO attorneys, including Acosta, as subjects of the investigation concerning their involvement in the NPA and victim notification.

Report conclusion
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030380.jpg

This legal document details the specific criteria and judicial process for a sexual offender to petition for removal from a lifetime registration requirement. It stipulates conditions such as a 25-year period without arrest post-release for certain offenses and compliance with the federal Adam Walsh Act. The procedure involves petitioning a circuit court, notifying the state attorney who may oppose the request, and ultimately providing a certified court order to the registering department to have the classification removed.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021487.jpg

This document is a page from a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report reviewing the conduct of Alexander Acosta and the USAO regarding the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). OPR concludes that while no professional misconduct occurred regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) due to legal ambiguities at the time, Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' by failing to ensure victims were notified of the state plea hearing. The report also details how an FBI administrative employee sent misleading form letters to victims stating the case was still 'under investigation' without proper coordination with prosecutors.

Government report (opr report) / court filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021372.jpg

This document is page 172 of a DOJ OPR report (filed in court in 2021 and 2023) criticizing former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text details Acosta's justification for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), citing the 'Petite policy' and a desire to avoid stepping on state sovereignty, reasoning the report calls 'flawed and unduly constricted.' The report notes that Acosta admitted the NPA was not an 'appropriate punishment' federally and that Epstein faced 168-210 months under federal guidelines.

Government report (likely doj opr report)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021197.jpg

This document is a table of contents from a legal filing, outlining a timeline of events from September 2007 to June 2008 related to the federal investigation of Epstein. It details the actions of the USAO, FBI, defense attorneys, and individuals like Acosta and Villafaña concerning a non-prosecution agreement (NPA), victim notification procedures, and Epstein's eventual state guilty plea on June 30, 2008. The document highlights the complex legal maneuvering and ongoing investigative efforts by both the prosecution and defense during this critical period.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019373.jpg

An FBI file clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated August 14, 2006, detailing the conflict between Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team following Epstein's indictment for felony solicitation of prostitution. The article highlights personal attacks by Epstein's lawyers against Reiter, calling him 'childish' and a 'loose cannon,' while also reporting on Reiter's ongoing divorce proceedings. The document is part of a larger file with classification number 31E-MM-108062.

Newspaper clipping / fbi form fd-350
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010547.jpg

This document consists of pages 206 and 207 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It details the conflict between Palm Beach Police and the State Attorney in 2006 regarding the charges against Jeffrey Epstein for soliciting underage females. The text explains how the State Attorney reduced charges to avoid jail time, prompting local police to request a federal investigation, and notes a 2007 meeting between federal prosecutors and Epstein's lawyer, Roy Black.

Book excerpt (filthy rich) / legal narrative
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010525.jpg

This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') stamped as a House Oversight exhibit. It details the account of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, who describes facing significant pressure from the local wealthy community and a specific 'prominent Palm Beach politician' to drop the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein (implied). Reiter recounts being told the victims were not believable due to their lifestyles and that investigating a 'Palm Beacher' was a mistake, but he refused to back down and referred the case to the FBI.

Book excerpt / legal exhibit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010501.jpg

This document is a page from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' (stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee). It details Police Chief Michael Reiter's early concerns about the Epstein investigation, specifically the involvement of underage females and the pressure he faced from 'powerful circles' to alter his approach. It also briefly introduces Detective Joe Recarey's work in February, mentioning his analysis of car-rental records linked to El Brillo Way and interviews with witnesses, including a David Rogers and a Swedish masseuse.

Book excerpt / legal exhibit (house oversight committee)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014105.jpg

This document is page 22 of a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, in the case involving Alan Dershowitz. It details the Defendant's objections to Requests for Production #12 and #13, which seek evidence regarding claims that Jane Doe #3 lied about world leaders and that a Palm Beach County State Attorney dropped a case due to her lack of credibility. Dershowitz's defense emphasizes that his original declaration stated these claims were made 'on information and belief' and agrees to produce non-privileged documents in his possession.

Legal response to request for production of documents
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
2
As Recipient
3
Total
5

Victim Notification

From: Acosta/USAO
To: state attorney

OPR found no evidence that Acosta's decision to defer victim notification was communicated to state authorities.

Lack of communication
N/A

No Subject

From: state attorney
To: Villafaña

'Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation.'

Email
N/A

No Subject

From: Villafaña
To: state attorney

'Sounds great.'

Response
N/A

Plea Deal

From: state attorney
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Offered plea to aggravated assault with probation.

Legal offer
N/A

Epstein Investigation

From: Michael Reiter
To: state attorney

Reiter informed the attorney about the investigation into a 'noteworthy person' involving underage females and requested close coordination.

Meeting
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity