| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
PBPD / PBSO
|
Inter agency cooperation |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmom
|
Interviewee interviewer |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Investigative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Steele
|
Source terminated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Informant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Collaboration |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Professional bureaucratic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Amanda Young
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Investigative informant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Investigation | An investigation in Florida, after which the defendant was not charged by the USAO-SDFL. | Florida | View |
| N/A | Interview | Minor Victim-4 was interviewed by the FBI and, according to the defense, did not implicate the de... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The FBI received names of other women present at the alleged orgies and attempted to corroborate ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR conducted an investigation into the government's conduct in the Epstein case, reviewing hundr... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | Carolyn was interviewed by the FBI about Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, which a client of the speaker was cooperating with. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR investigated a gap in Acosta's emails related to the Epstein investigation, questioning Acost... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Law enforcement search | The FBI conducted a search of a residence, pulled a safe from a closet, and opened it with a saw.... | residence | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An ongoing and active investigation into associates of Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Search and seizure | A search of a residence was conducted, during which binders containing CDs were seized as evidenc... | A residence | View |
| N/A | Evidence review | The FBI reviewed the CDs that were seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An investigation conducted by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Reporting to law enforcement | The author, Sigrid S. McCawley, went to the FBI, an event which she states led to her life no lon... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Dr. Loftus consulted with various government agencies involved in the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Meetings between witnesses and the government/FBI where the defense alleges manipulation occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Search | The FBI conducted a search and seized CDs from a drawer in a closet on the fifth floor. | closet located on the fifth... | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A federal investigation into Epstein's abuse, which victims and their attorneys were told was ong... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Interviewee had a meeting with the FBI. | interviewee's house | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Interviewee had a conversation with the FBI. | interviewee's father's resi... | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) conducted a review of hundreds of thousands of pa... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A criminal investigation and prosecution where the defendant, Thomas, is seeking discovery materi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Concern raised | The FBI raised concerns with Villafaña that notifying victims could create potential impeachment ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The Epstein investigation, which occurred soon after the passage of the CVRA (Crime Victims' Righ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Disclosure to fbi | Annie Farmer told the FBI that her story and the 'money piece' were not sexualized. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal discovery | Rodgers' flight logs were subpoenaed and turned over to the FBI and plaintiffs' lawyers as part o... | N/A | View |
This document is an email chain from December 2007 involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys in West Palm Beach discussing the finalization of paperwork for Jeffrey Epstein's plea conference. The correspondents discuss drafting a factual basis for the 'procuring statute' that is 'short and sweet with no names,' with a date set for December 21. One prosecutor expresses frustration, stating they find the situation regarding information requests 'very demoralizing.'
An email chain concluding with a formal letter from Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's attorney) to Alex [Acosta] (US Attorney). Lefkowitz argues against federal prosecution, claiming 'Main Justice' is not directing it and that it would be a 'novel application' of statutes. He cites witness testimony alleging women lied about their ages to Epstein and that the FBI pressured women to identify as victims. He requests a meeting to resolve the matter before a July 8 state court deadline.
This document is a chain of emails between likely federal prosecutors or FBI officials discussing the legal strategy regarding Jeffrey Epstein in March 2008. It details the conflict between state and federal indictments, Epstein's attempts to manipulate plea deals to avoid sex offender registration and jail time (seeking work release or home confinement instead), and specific evidence regarding a victim he abused just prior to her 18th birthday. The emails also highlight Epstein's legal team's tactics, such as subpoenaing victims not in the state indictment to gain intelligence on the federal investigation.
This document is an email chain from December 2007 between likely government prosecutors or officials discussing the Jeffrey Epstein case. The conversation covers the selection of a 'Special Master' (discussing candidates 'Bert' and 'Mr. Ocariz'), communications with Epstein's defense attorney 'Jay' (Lefkowitz) and the firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails also detail a request for a 'de novo review' of evidence for a proposed indictment, specifically asking for FBI '302s' and state Grand Jury transcripts.
This document is an email dated November 5, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach to a recipient named Jeff. The email reports that another girl has contacted the FBI after being approached by private investigators working for Epstein, suggesting potential witness tampering or intimidation during the investigation.
This document contains correspondence from attorney Brad Edwards to the U.S. Attorney's Office in July 2008 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards disputes the government's proposed stipulation of facts, specifically regarding when victims were notified of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and asserts that he and his clients were kept in the dark about the NPA while urging federal charges. The attached July 3rd letter formally requests federal prosecution, characterizing Epstein as a prolific predator who abused over 100 girls, arguing that the state plea deal was grossly inadequate.
An internal email from the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) to colleagues and the FBI discussing Jeffrey Epstein's work release terms in December 2008. The sender expresses disbelief that Epstein earns 'gain time' (two days off his sentence for every week on work release) while spending 12 hours a day in his office, effectively shortening his sentence by two months to a July 23rd release date.
This document is an email dated July 18, 2008, from an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. It confirms that a victim notification letter has been filed in court regarding a federal civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein. The email notes that approximately 10 letters have been sent to victims and that the FBI's victim coordinator is updating addresses to send the remainder the following Monday.
This email from a prosecutor (implied by the West Palm Beach address and context) updates a colleague on the Epstein case. It details a grand jury presentation where a juror expressed relief that the case wasn't being 'whitewashed,' mentions Epstein's lawyers harassing victims via civil suits, reports a victim's recent suicide attempt, and expresses frustration with delays while victims suffer.
This document is a chain of internal emails from December 2007, likely among prosecutors, discussing strategy in the Epstein case. Key topics include a request for a 'de novo review' of evidence (including FBI 302s and Grand Jury transcripts) following correspondence from Epstein's defense firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails also discuss the selection process for a 'Special Master' or similar role, debating candidates named Bert and Mr. Ocariz, and mention drafting a letter to Jay Lefkowitz.
This document contains an email exchange from November 5, 2007, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach and an individual named Jeff. The AUSA informs Jeff that another girl has contacted the FBI after being approached by private investigators working for Epstein. Jeff acknowledges the message and notes he has not yet heard from an individual named Jay.
This document is an email dated November 1, 2007, containing a draft communication intended for the State Attorney's Office. The sender (likely a federal prosecutor) is coordinating the timing of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing with state proceedings. The email highlights the existence of a federal non-prosecution agreement and requests that Judge McSorley schedule the plea and sentencing before January 4, 2008, to ensure Epstein complies with the federal agreement terms.
This document contains an email chain between the FBI (NYO and CID) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS/SDNY) from May 7-8, 2020. The most critical email outlines the status of the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. It states that SDNY is close to a final decision on charging her for complicity in Epstein's sex trafficking. The FBI confirms they believe she is living in Manchester by the Sea, MA, tracked via pen registers, cell site data, and Amazon delivery subpoenas. Traditional surveillance (pole cameras) was deemed unsuitable due to the secluded location, leading to requests for renewed digital tracking and mail covers.
This document is an email chain from February to May 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a forensic/technical team regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical difficulties, including the inability to link emails to attachments (using 'flight records' as an example), mismatched load files, and a 'disaster' in tracking over 1 million documents. The technical team notes delays due to COVID-19 work reductions and a major network replacement that required the deletion of 400 TB of old data.
This document is a crucial email chain dated May 7, 2020, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). It reveals that authorities had tracked Ghislaine Maxwell to a secluded property in Manchester-by-the-Sea, Massachusetts, months before her July 2020 arrest. The emails confirm SDNY was close to a charging decision for sex trafficking and details the investigative methods used to locate her, including historical pen registers, cell site location data, and subpoenas to Amazon for delivery addresses, as traditional surveillance was deemed difficult due to the location's seclusion.
An email chain from January 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney at the Southern District of New York and support staff regarding the setup of a Relativity database for the case 'U.S. v. Epstein'. The correspondence details the upload of FBI case files (dated 2018-12-04) and mentions the expectation of receiving a 'large amount of case files' in the coming weeks. The AUSA also notes potential future privilege review requirements.
An email thread from January 11, 2019, discussing significant upcoming events for a legal or investigative team. The sender notes that the team assigned to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation will travel to Florida the following week to meet with agents from the original investigation and collect hard copy files. The email also reports on the sentencing of former MCC guard Victor Casado for bribery and smuggling contraband.
An email dated April 16, 2019, from the Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The sender discusses reviewing old Epstein FBI interview reports (302s) and grand jury testimony, identifying specific potential victim witnesses based on age and the severity of the conduct described. The email asks colleagues to confirm if these victims have been contacted.
This document is an email chain between SDNY prosecutors and FBI agents/support staff regarding the logistical scanning of Jeffrey Epstein's physical case files (approx. 23 boxes) in July 2019. The emails detail the discovery of missing evidence items (1A10, 1A28, 1A84), the existence of previous scans from 2013 by the Miami Field Office, and a strict protocol decision not to scan 'pornographic images of young girls.' A later email from October 2020 reflects on the location of digital discs associated with the file, noting that discovery ceased after Epstein's death on August 10, 2019.
This document is an email chain from August to October 2020 between attorneys Gloria Allred and Mariann Wang and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The attorneys are coordinating interviews for several new victims (referred to by initials AR, DM, JRC, and EH) willing to speak to the FBI regarding incidents involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ranging from 2000 to 2017. Notably, one client (AR) alleges an interaction with Prince Andrew at Epstein's townhouse in approximately 2010.
This document is an email chain between SDNY prosecutors and FBI support staff (DocLab) regarding the digitization of physical evidence files for the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The correspondence spans from June 2019 to October 2020, covering the shipment of approximately 23 boxes of evidence (Case files 72-MM-113327 and 31E-MM-108062) for scanning. Key details include the refusal to scan 'pornographic images of young girls' due to FBI protocols, the retrieval of missing evidence items ('1As') from digital backups, and a 2020 follow-up ensuring all materials were correctly processed for discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Internal email correspondence from October 2020 between USANYS officials regarding discovery obligations. The team discusses a conversation with an original FBI agent from the Florida Epstein investigation, deciding not to re-collect emails between him and a specific AUSA (as OPR already collected them), but confirming the agent will send emails involving victims or witnesses and other potentially discoverable documents.
This document is an email chain from October 9, 2020, between staff at the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The discussion concerns the 'Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell) and specifically coordinates the review of images from 'Epstein devices' by the FBI and issues related to 'CART' (Computer Analysis Response Team). The emails confirm the FBI assured the US Attorney's office they would complete the image review.
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser) to the US Government prosecutors complaining about the government's failure to provide readable discovery materials at the MDC. The letter highlights that the government holds approximately 40,000 non-nude and thousands of nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The defense requests a fully readable laptop for Maxwell and immediate access to the seized images, noting that COVID-19 restrictions complicate the review process.
An April 2019 email chain involving the Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the SDNY. The discussion concerns identifying and engaging 'significant victim witnesses' from old Epstein FBI 302 reports and grand jury testimony, specifically noting victims of young age or conduct 'well beyond massages'. The participants arrange a meeting to discuss these individuals and strategy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity