| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
PBPD / PBSO
|
Inter agency cooperation |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmom
|
Interviewee interviewer |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Investigative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Steele
|
Source terminated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Informant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Collaboration |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Professional bureaucratic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Amanda Young
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Investigative informant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1985-01-01 | N/A | Arrest of Ronald Pelton by the FBI. | USA | View |
| 1979-01-01 | N/A | Hanssen penetrated the FBI for Russian intelligence. | USA | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Escalation of FBI tactics against the narrator. | USA | View |
| 0024-01-01 | N/A | National Security Advisor Michael Flynn lied to the FBI about his contacts with the Russian Ambas... | United States | View |
| 0018-04-09 | N/A | FBI raids Michael Cohen's office | Cohen office | View |
| -2019-09-30 | N/A | Search of Jeffrey Epstein's New York house | New York house | View |
| -2019-09-30 | N/A | Seizure of approximately 38 computers/electronic devices and 55 CDs from New York house. | New York House | View |
| -2019-09-18 | N/A | FBI taking photos of the SHU and measuring steps from Epstein's cell to guard desk. | SHU (Special Housing Unit) | View |
| -2019-08-08 | N/A | Recent flyover | Over Epstein's island | View |
| -2019-08-01 | N/A | Search of his island | Epstein's Island | View |
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 19-2221, detailing legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein between July 16 and July 23, 2019. Key events include the filing of letters by Epstein's attorneys regarding bail, the appearance of several new attorneys, a bond hearing on July 18 where bail was denied by Judge Richard M. Berman, and the subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal by Epstein. The document lists all parties present at the hearing, including prosecutors, defense attorneys, and law enforcement agents.
This document contains docket entries for Case 19-2221 (USA v. Jeffrey Epstein) from July 15-16, 2019. It records court appearances by Epstein, his defense team (Weinberg, Weingarten, Fernich, etc.), and government representatives (Comey, FBI Agent Young, NYPD Detective Byrne). Key events include the scheduling of a bail hearing ruling for July 18, 2019, the granting of a speedy trial time exclusion, the filing of transcripts from a July 8 conference, and the admission of Martin Weinberg as counsel Pro Hac Vice.
This document is page 12 of a government legal filing from July 18, 2019, arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. It details evidence found during a July 6-7, 2019 FBI search of Epstein's NYC mansion, specifically a 'vast trove' of CD's containing thousands of nude photographs of underage girls and women, which the government labels as 'photographic trophies.' The prosecution argues this evidence, along with his 2008 conviction, demonstrates that Epstein poses an ongoing danger to the community.
This document is a court docket sheet from July 16-23, 2019, detailing the proceedings of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19-2221). It documents the denial of Epstein's bail during a hearing on July 18, 2019, presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, attended by FBI and NYPD representatives. Following the remand order, Epstein's defense team filed a Notice of Appeal on July 22, 2019, along with a sealed document placed in the vault.
This document is a page from the court docket in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19-2221), dated July 23, 2019. It details court filings and proceedings from July 15th and 16th, 2019, including motions regarding a speedy trial, the admission of attorney Martin Weinberg to the case, and the filing of transcripts from a prior conference. The entries also reference motions and letters concerning Epstein's pretrial release and detention, showing active litigation between Epstein's legal team and the U.S. government before Judge Richard M. Berman.
An anonymous victim of Epstein writes a memo to Judge Richard M. Berman, expressing profound distrust in the DOJ and FBI, whom the author believes are protecting powerful individuals involved with Epstein. The author questions the official cause of Epstein's death and argues that the public release of the 'Epstein Files' is harming victims. The memo concludes with a formal request for a third-party review of all documents to ensure that no victims' identities are revealed.
This document is a legal filing (page 8 of 10) addressing factors for maintaining grand jury secrecy. It confirms that the sole witness for the Epstein grand jury (an FBI agent) and the two witnesses for the Maxwell grand jury (the same FBI agent and an NYPD detective) are currently alive and employed. It argues for the redaction of transcripts to protect third parties and victims who were not charged in the crimes.
This document is a page from a court transcript involving the case of Jeffrey Epstein. It features a statement describing the abuse suffered by a victim named Jennifer and calls for justice against Epstein's enablers, followed by a personal victim impact statement from Ms. Aroz detailing the long-term trauma she endured.
This document is a transcript of an attorney speaking in court about their representation of Jeffrey Epstein's victims. The attorney explains that an initial FBI investigation was resolved through a "secret deal" that prevented over 30 victims in Florida from participating in a hearing, denying them their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The speaker emphasizes that this treatment by the criminal justice system exponentially aggravated the harm caused by Epstein's abuse.
This court transcript from a hearing on September 3, 2019, details an argument by Ms. Comey against the court conducting its own investigation into the death of Mr. Epstein. She informs the court that an active and separate investigation is already being conducted by a grand jury, Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York, and the FBI. Ms. Comey asserts that such an investigation is the proper function of these entities, not the court, especially concerning uncharged matters.
This document is a court transcript where an attorney expresses significant doubt about the official ruling of suicide in their client's death at the MCC on August 10, 2019. The attorney cites corrupted video evidence, which is now with the FBI, and questions whether this was a pre-existing issue, drawing a parallel to another secure prison. The attorney asks the judge to investigate the death and voices frustration over receiving information from the media instead of the U.S. Attorney's office.
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding where an unnamed speaker argues for the court's supervision of an investigation into components of the Department of Justice. The speaker highlights the 'dreadful' and 'disgraceful' conditions of the local jail where Jeffrey Epstein was held, claiming they are worse than at Guantanamo. The core argument is that court oversight is necessary to maintain public confidence in the justice system and to uncover the truth about the situation.
This document is page 2 of a court transcript from a case filed on September 3, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It records the opening of the proceeding where the Judge asks for introductions. Government attorneys Maureen Comey and Alison Moe introduce themselves, noting the presence of FBI Special Agent Amanda Young and NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, while defense attorneys Reid Weingarten, Martin Weinberg, and Michael Miller (of Steptoe & Johnson) introduce themselves.
In a letter dated August 12, 2019, Lamine N'Diaye, the Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), responds to an inquiry from Judge Richard M. Berman. The Warden confirms that the ongoing FBI and OIG investigations into the August 10, 2019 incident involving inmate Jeffrey Epstein will also encompass a prior incident that occurred on July 23, 2019. Due to the active investigations, the Warden states he is unable to release any information about the internal investigation that had already been completed regarding the July incident.
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a Bail Decision hearing held on July 18, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19 CR 490). Presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, the document lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Geoffrey S. Berman) and Epstein's defense team (including Martin Weinberg and Michael Miller). Also noted as present are FBI Special Agent Amanda Young, NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, and Pretrial Services Officer John Moscato.
This document is page 62 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, appearing to be a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). A prosecutor argues against the defendant's request for home detention, describing it as a 'gilded cage' and 'private jail' that necessitates actual detention. The prosecutor also clarifies that the SDNY case was independently investigated by the FBI, CBP, and NYPD, explicitly stating there was no coordination with the Southern District of Florida regarding the initiation of this specific case.
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney argues that their client, Mr. Epstein, is not a flight risk. The attorney cites past actions as evidence, including not fleeing before his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), hiring lawyers, and serving time in county jail, from which he was released in 2010. The document also mentions a past legal dispute in New York regarding Mr. Epstein's classification.
This document is page 2 of a court filing from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 24, 2019. It is a continuation of the 'APPEARANCES' section, listing individuals present for the legal proceeding. Those listed include David Boies, Brad Edwards, and representatives from the NYPD, FBI, and U.S. Pretrial Services.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the pretrial detention of Mr. Epstein. The prosecution contends that a July 2019 search of his New York City mansion uncovered a 'vast trove' of sexually suggestive photographs of young women and girls, which they describe as 'photographic trophies.' This evidence, combined with his 2008 Florida sex crime convictions, is presented to demonstrate that he poses an 'ongoing and forward-looking danger' to the community and should not be released pending trial.
This document is the cover page for the transcript of a court conference in the criminal case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, held on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. It identifies the presiding Magistrate Judge, Henry B. Pitman, and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as an FBI agent and an NYPD detective who were also present. The document was filed with the court on July 16, 2019.
This document is page 9 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (SDNY). The prosecution argues that the Southern District of New York is not bound by the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg counters that the NPA provided Epstein with immunity for the conduct currently being prosecuted, including interstate travel and communications, and asserts that Epstein fulfilled the terms of that agreement.
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a conference held on July 8, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein, with Judge Richard M. Berman presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other officials present, including an FBI agent, an NYPD officer, and two probation officers.
This legal document page describes the extensive, eight-month negotiation of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) starting in January 2007, contrasting it with a potential plea agreement that was also drafted. It emphasizes the deep involvement of multiple levels of the U.S. government, including the Department of Justice, the USAO for the Southern District of Florida, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, and the FBI, in the negotiation and approval process.
This legal document argues that a charge (Count Six) should be dismissed because the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) is bound by a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The author contends that the NPA shows an "affirmative appearance" of a broad restriction on prosecution for co-conspirators, contrasting it with the specifically limited non-prosecution provision for Epstein, which was restricted to "in this District."
This page from a 2023 court filing analyzes the text of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It details that the FBI investigated Epstein for offenses committed between 2001 and 2007, and that the NPA was intended to 'globally' resolve his liability. The text explains that federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida was deferred in favor of state prosecution by Florida, provided Epstein abided by the terms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity