Executive Branch
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: INS v. Chadha. The executive branch enforced a legislative veto, allowing for... | United States | View |
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha, where the executive branch enforced a legislative veto it oppos... | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010617.jpg
This document is the cover page of an OGE Form 278e, the Public Financial Disclosure Report for the Executive Branch, filed by Donald J. Trump. It lists his position as President of the United States, with an appointment date of January 20, 2017. The form was signed by Trump on June 14, 2017, and subsequently certified by an agency ethics official on the same day and an OGE official on June 16, 2017.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026249.jpg
This document is a letter from Donald F. McGahn II, Counsel to the President, announcing the President's authorization to declassify a specific memorandum. The decision was made after a review involving the White House, DNI, and DOJ, citing 'significant public interest.' The document is cc'd to Speaker Paul Ryan and Ranking Member Adam Schiff and does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026248.jpg
This document is a letter from the White House to Chairman Devin Nunes, dated February 2, 2018, concerning the House Intelligence Committee's vote to release a classified memorandum (known as the 'Nunes Memo'). The letter affirms the President's constitutional authority over declassification and states that the Committee's action is being interpreted as a formal request for the President to declassify the memo. This document is related to disputes over FISA surveillance during the 2016 election and is not related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any of his known activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012394.jpg
This document summarizes the legal case of Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman. The Ninth Circuit initially ruled that the President acted in bad faith by refusing to comply with the Competition in Contracting Act and awarded attorneys' fees to Lear Siegler. However, upon a rehearing en banc, the court reversed its decision, ruling that Lear Siegler was not a prevailing party and withdrew the prior opinion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012392.jpg
This document is a legal and historical memorandum, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012392', which compiles precedents regarding the separation of powers within the U.S. government. It cites historical statements, letters, and congressional reports to explore the President's authority to challenge or refuse to implement legislation deemed unconstitutional. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals or events.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012391.jpg
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012391,' lists historical precedents of U.S. Presidents from 1876 to 1990 using signing statements to challenge the constitutionality of 'legislative veto' provisions in various acts. Presidents including Kennedy, Nixon, Reagan, and Grant are cited as having declared they would not be bound by such provisions, treating them as non-binding requests or nullities. The document appears to be legal or historical research compiled for a government body, but its content does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012390.jpg
This document is a legal analysis, likely from a government entity like the House Oversight Committee, detailing the constitutional basis for U.S. Presidents to refuse to enforce laws they deem unconstitutional, often through the use of presidential signing statements. It cites several opinions from the Office of Legal Counsel (O.L.C.) and provides historical examples from the administrations of Presidents Wilson and Eisenhower to support the executive's authority. This document is unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein and contains no information about him or any associated individuals, events, or entities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012387.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012387', outlining the constitutional basis for a U.S. President to refuse to enforce a statute believed to be unconstitutional. It details the President's duty to defend executive power and uses the 1926 Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, involving President Wilson, as a key historical precedent. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012386.jpg
This legal memorandum, dated November 2, 1994, is addressed to Abner J. Mikva, Counsel to the President. It argues that the President has the constitutional authority to decline to execute statutes he believes are unconstitutional, citing judicial precedent from cases like Myers v. United States and long-standing executive branch practice. The memorandum then begins to lay out specific propositions for how and when this authority should be exercised, starting with the President's obligation to act within the bounds of the Constitution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012384.jpg
This document is page 13 of a letter from Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski to members of several congressional committees. The letter proposes an amendment to the "2005 reauthorization" to mandate collaboration between the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice (Attorney General), and Homeland Security regarding a pilot program for victims. The letter states that the Office of Management and Budget has no objection to this proposal on behalf of the Administration.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity